Scattering free electron

Friedel used the local perturbation f/—as a model for the scattering potential, reduced it even to one spherically symmetric scatterer and calculated the scattering by free electrons. By that, for the scatterer at the origin labeled by j = 0,... 

The method of superposition of configurations is essentially based on the assumption that the basic orbitals form a complete set. The most popular basis used so far in the literature is certainly formed by the hydrogen-like functions, which set contains a discrete and a continuous part. The discrete subset corresponds physically to the bound states of an electron around a proton, whereas the continuous part corresponds to a free electron scattered by a proton, or classically to the elliptic and hyperbolic orbits, respectively, in a central-field problem. 

In this contribution we will deal with electron-electron correlation in solids and how to learn about these by means of inelastic X-ray scattering both in the regime of small and large momentum transfer. We will compare the predictions of simple models (free electron gas, jellium model) and more sophisticated ones (calculations using the self-energy influenced spectral weight function) to experimental results. In a last step, lattice effects will be included in the theoretical treatment. 

It is well known that the energy profiles of Compton scattered X-rays in solids provide a lot of important information about the electronic structures [1], The application of the Compton scattering method to high pressure has attracted a lot of attention since the extremely intense X-rays was obtained from a synchrotron radiation (SR) source. Lithium with three electrons per atom (one conduction electron and two core electrons) is the most elementary metal available for both theoretical and experimental studies. Until now there have been a lot of works not only at ambient pressure but also at high pressure because its electronic state is approximated by free electron model (FEM) [2, 3]. In the present work we report the result of the measurement of the Compton profile of Li at high pressure and pressure dependence of the Fermi momentum by using SR. 

Uniaxial orientation parameter (Hermans orientation function) Scattering data evaluation program by A. Hammersley (ESRF) Free Electron Laser Hamburg Full width at half-maximum... 

In high-mobility liquids, the quasi-free electron is often visualized as having an effective mass m different fron the usual electron mass m. It arises due to multiple scattering of the electron while the mean free path remains long. The ratio of mean acceleration to an external force can be defined as the inverse effective mass. Often, the effective mass is equated to the electron mass m when its value is unknown and difficult to determine. In LRGs values of mVm 0.3 to 0.5 have been estimated (Asaf and Steinberger,1974). Ascarelli (1986) uses mVm = 0.27 in LXe and a density-dependent value in LAr. 

In an electron scattering or recombination process, the free center of the incoming electron has the functions w,- = m, U v,- and the initial state of the free electron is some function v,- the width of which is chosen on the basis of the electron momentum and the time it takes the electron to arrive at the target. Such choice is important in order to avoid nonphysical behavior due to the natural spreading of the wavepacket. 

The interaction of even simple diatomic molecules with strong laser fields is considerably more complicated than the interaction with atoms. In atoms, nearly all of the observed phenomena can be explained with a simple three-step model [1], at least in the tunneling regime (1) The laser field releases the least bound electron through tunneling ionization (2) the free electron evolves in the laser field and (3) under certain conditions, the electron can return to the vicinity of the ion core, and either collisionally ionize a second electron [2], scatter off the core and gain additional kinetic energy [3], or recombine with the core and produce a harmonic photon [4]. 

Inelastic photon scattering processes are also possible. In 1928, the Indian scientist C. V. Raman (who won the Nobel Prize in 1930) demonstrated a type of inelastic scattering that had already been predicted by A. Smekal in 1923. This type of scattering gave rise to a new type of spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, in which the light is inelastically scattered by a substance. This effect is in some ways similar to the Compton effect, which occurs as a result of the inelastic scattering of electromagnetic radiation by free electrons. 

The damping term in a metal is due to the scattering suffered by the free electrons with atoms and electrons in the solid, which produces the electrical resistivity. 

The atomic scattering factors /, are ustrally calculated in terms of the scattering of an individtral free electron. This is calculated as if the electron were a classical oscillator—since the assrrmption is that the electron is a free charged... 

The scattering of the free electron for E0 = 1 is obtained from this expression by setting both the force constant cos and the damping factor k equal to zero, which gives... 

The Fermi surface plays an important role in the theory of metals. It is defined by the reciprocal-space wavevectors of the electrons with largest kinetic energy, and is the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) in molecular orbital theory. For a free electron gas, the Fermi surface is spherical, that is, the kinetic energy of the electrons is only dependent on the magnitude, not on the direction of the wavevector. In a free electron gas the electrons are completely delocalized and will not contribute to the intensity of the Bragg reflections. As a result, an accurate scale factor may not be obtainable from a least-squares refinement with neutral atom scattering factors. 

---