Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Scattering amplitude definition

The 5-matrix is unitary and symmetric, while the T-matrix is symmetric. This particular definition of the T-matrix reduces for scattering by a central potential to the phase-shift factor in the scattering amplitude,... [Pg.133]

By definition, the atomic scattering factor /(x) is given in terms of the amplitude scattered by a single electron at the lattice point. It is useful, however, to have the scattered amplitude/I in terms of the incident amplitude Aq. From classical electromagnetic theory, it follows that if a wave of amplitude Aq is incident on a free electron, the amplitude A of the radiation emitted in the forward direction, at a distance R (meters) from the electron, is given by... [Pg.67]

The basic definition of an effective medium is that the ESU, when embedded in the effective medium, should not be detectable in an experiment using electromagnetic measurement. In other words, the extinction of the ESU should be the same as if it were replaced with a material characterized by Ceff. This criterion makes it fruitful to use a recently derived [12] optical theorem for absorbing media it relates the extinction of the spherical cell compared to that of the surrounding medium with the scattering amplitude in the direction of the impinging beam S(0) (forward scattering amplitude) by... [Pg.205]

The coherent portion of the scattering by an atom is found by summing the coherent scattering amplitude from each of the electrons in the atom. If f is the coherent scattering amplitude of one bound electron expressed in electron units (eu), then by definition... [Pg.9]

As per definition, the scattering factor, / of an object is simply the ratio of scattering amplitude of the object/atom to that of an electron under identical conditions. The scattering factor of an electron, therefore, always equals unity, that is,/ = 1. [Pg.215]

This observation is the first part of the cancellation puzzle [20, 21, 27, 29]. We know from Section lll.B that we should be able to solve it directly by applying Eq. (19), which will separate out the contributions to the DCS made by the 1-TS and 2-TS reaction paths. That this is true is shown by Fig. 9(b). It is apparent that the main backward concentration of the scattering comes entirely from the 1-TS paths. This is not a surprise, since, by definition, the direct abstraction mechanism mentioned only involves one TS. What is perhaps surprising is that the small lumps in the forward direction, which might have been mistaken for numerical noise, are in fact the products of the 2-TS paths. Since the 1-TS and 2-TS paths scatter their products into completely different regions of space, there is no interference between the amplitudes f (0) and hence no GP effects. [Pg.24]

For energies below the dissociation threshold we can use various coordinate systems to solve the nuclear Schrodinger equation (2.32). If the displacement from equilibrium is small, normal coordinates are most appropriate (Wilson, Decius, and, Cross 1955 ch.2 Weissbluth 1978 ch.27 Daudel et al. 1983 ch.7 Atkins 1983 ch.ll). However, if the vibrational amplitudes increase so-called local coordinates become more advantageous (Child and Halonen 1984 Child 1985 Halonen 1989). Eventually, the molecular vibration becomes unbound and the molecule dissociates. Under such circumstances, Jacobi or so-called scattering coordinates are the most suitable coordinates they facilitate the definition of the boundary conditions of the continuum wavefunctions at infinite distances which we need to determine scattering or dissociation cross sections (Child 1991 ch.l0). Normal coordinates become less and less appropriate if the vibrational amplitudes increase they are completely impractical for the description of unbound motion in the continuum. [Pg.38]

Of the 16 terms in (9.18) for f = jo = 1/2, 10 can be omitted because they violate conservation of total spin angular momentum on the basis of pure exchange scattering, leaving only the above six terms. Recalling the definitions in section 9.1.2 of the direct and exchange amplitudes / and g (equns. (9.4a) and (9.4b) respectively) one has... [Pg.246]

The methods are very complicated and require a large number of discrete items of information to describe a particle shape reasonably well they actually produce the signature of the particle, particularly if the coefficients are coupled with their respective phase angle. Meloy found that, in spite of a considerable scatter of data points, the log-log plot of coefficient amplitudes yields a straight line. He named this the law of morphological coefficients and defined the concept of random particles whereby, by definition and under certain assumptions, a random particle has a straight line as its signature. [Pg.66]

A key point in the definition of any potential, often overlooked, is that one must specify in advance how it is to be used. Let us work in the c.m. system of the particles, scattering with total energy E. With h(j = hj(l)+h( (2) the free Hamiltonian for the particles, we will require that the transition amplitude computed from... [Pg.439]

Here the structure factor signifies the vectorial sum of the waves scattered by the single atoms which show amplitude f and phase y. Every atom contributes a scattered wave to the whole diffraction effect, the amplitude of which is proportional to the so-called form factor. The phase is thus defined by the position of the atom in the elementary cell, whilst the form factor is a characteristic constant for every sort of atom which represents a measure of its scattering power. Hence no special differences exist in the positions of the diffracted beams, which in both X-ray and electron diffraction cases satisfy the geometric relations between lattice constant and X-ray or material wavelengths, according to the Bragg equation. However, there are definitely differences in their intensities. [Pg.345]

This chapter provides an introduction to different spectroscopic techniques that are based either on the coherent excitation of atoms and molecules or on the coherent superposition of light scattered by molecules and small particles. The coherent excitation establishes definite phase relations between the amplitudes of the atomic or molecular wave functions this, in turn, determines the total amplitudes of the emitted, scattered, or absorbed radiation. [Pg.369]

Given the definition of S matrix operator, S = S2 S2+, the probability amplitude to scatter from an initial state i of the reactant arrangement a to a final state / of the product arrangement fi is written as the matrix element of the S operator [153],... [Pg.87]


See other pages where Scattering amplitude definition is mentioned: [Pg.121]    [Pg.6128]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.6127]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.1882]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.12]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.28 ]




SEARCH



Amplitude definition

Scattering amplitude

© 2024 chempedia.info