Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Scalar mean estimated

The estimation of statistical quantities for each cell is straightforward. For example, the estimated scalar mean in the /th cell is just... [Pg.350]

In order to simulate (6.194) and (6.195) numerically, it will be necessary to estimate the location-conditioned mean scalar field < />. Y )(.v. t) from the notional particles X(ni(j), (p t) for n e 1,..., Nv. In order to distinguish between the estimate and the true value, we will denote the former by

notional particles used in the simulation. Likewise, the subscript M is a reminder that the estimate will depend on the number of grid cells (M) used to resolve the mean fields across the computational domain. [Pg.318]

Given the estimate for the mean scalar field (or any other statistic) is found... [Pg.321]

Collecting the terms, the estimated mean scalar field can be written as... [Pg.323]

Parallel to the case of a single random variable, the mean vector and covariance matrix of random variables involved in a measurement are usually unknown, suggesting the use of their sampling distributions instead. Let us assume that x is a vector of n normally distributed variables with mean n-column vector ft and covariance matrix L. A sample of m observations has a mean vector x and annxn covariance matrix S. The properties of the t-distribution are extended to n variables by stating that the scalar m(x—p)TS ( —p) is distributed as the Hotelling s-T2 distribution. The matrix S/m is simply the covariance matrix of the estimate x. There is no need to tabulate the T2 distribution since the statistic... [Pg.206]

A vector x of n random variables has been measured m times, the ith measurement resulting in an estimate of the mean value x, and of the covariance matrix St. A best estimate Jt of the pooled ( weighted ) average makes the sum of squared statistical distances to each x minimum. The scalar expression... [Pg.285]

The approach described can be extended to a more complicated nonspherical case. Similar to Equation (1.154), we consider a neutral system composed of two Born spheres with 61 = 6 and 62 = — 6- It is usually called The dumbbell . For the isolated spheres we denote their charge densities as px and p2, their response fields as defined similar to the single sphere case. The solvation energy for such system equals to UsoXy = 0.5[(scalar products mean volume integrals. The reasonable estimate for separate terms in will be Ut = 0.5 ((P-p ), (i = 1, 2), Uini(R) = ( 1 2) = ( VPi)> where Ux and U2 are solvation energies obtained in terms of Equation (1.153) whereas the interaction energy is identified with Equation (1.154). In this result we assume that the... [Pg.104]

VV( or q from equation (48) in the flame-sheet approximation. Since knowledge of the joint or conditioned functions is practically absent [27], statistical independence is often hypothesized or else it is merely assumed, less restric-tively, that the conditioned-mean dissipation equals the unconditioned mean. A small amount of data is available on unconditioned-average rates of scalar dissipation in turbulent flows (see discussions in [83]-[86]), and additional measurements are being made. These results allow estimates of Xc to be made, even though accurate calculations are beyond current capabilities. [Pg.407]

This is the primary means of obtaining information about the canopy source distribution of a scalar from atmospheric concentration measurements. A formal discrete solution is found by matrix inversion of Et]. (17), choosing the number of source layers (m) to be ecjual to the number of concentration measurements (n) so that D j is a scjuare matrix. However, this solution provides no redundancy in concentration information, and therefore no possibility for smoothing measurement errors in the concentration profile, which can cause large errors in the inferred source profile. A simple means of overcoming this problem is to include redundant concentration information, and then find the sources , which produce the best fit to the measured concentrations c, by maximum-likelihood estimation. By minimizing the squared error between measured values and concentrations predicted by Eq. (17), 4>j is found (Raupach, 1989b) to be the solution of m linear ec[uations... [Pg.50]

A comparison between Bayesian and Fourier analysis is provided by Kotyk et and Evilia et They both show that the Bayesian methods provide more precise frequency estimates and far more precise amplitude estimates than DFT and explain the difference. However, it should be said that the methods are so different in nature that comparison is more difficult than for other methods discussed in this paper. For example, by known Ti the Kotyk etal. mean that T2 has been included in the calculation as a matched exponential apodiza-tion. Vines et demonstrated the ability to mea.sure scalar couplings that are much smaller than linewidth in the case of spectra with favorable S/N ratio. The same authors took advantage of the ability of BPT to accurately measure linewidth to improve exchange parameters and gain in the precision and accuracy of thermodynamic properties.- ... [Pg.182]

A typical state space model for stand-alone GPS would have 8 states, the spatial coordinates and their velocities, and the clock offset and frequency. The individual pseudo-range measurements can be processed sequentially, which means that the Kalman gains can be calculated as scalars without the need for matrix inversions. There is no minimum number of measurements required to obtain an updated position estimate. The measurements are processed in an optimum fashion and if not enough for good geometry, the estimate of state error variance [P (fc)] will grow. If two sateUites are available, the clock bias terms are just propagated forward via the state transition matrix. [Pg.1874]

To get an estimate for the leptonic decay rates, note that vector boson effects are unimportant, so that from Section 1.2 the Feynman amplitude for the pseudo-scalar P —> decay will be given by (0 means vacuum)... [Pg.286]

This derivation is not very satisfying because we used a velocity that was not really averaged over all orientations and the result depends on the phenomenological ideal gas law. We also note that the resulting form of v is a scalar as the square root of a vector squared using the dot product and we call it vrms. It is good that we obtain a scalar, but what does it mean to have a root-mean-square speed However, we can use it to estimate the speed as for N2 gas at 25°C to get some idea of the KMTG velocities. Why not calculate this apparent speed in miles per hour (mph) Note this is a diatomic molecule and also the formula has no dependence on pressure, just temperature dependence. We better check the units for R in this calculation. [Pg.39]


See other pages where Scalar mean estimated is mentioned: [Pg.320]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.878]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.519]    [Pg.479]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.347]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.301 , Pg.331 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.301 , Pg.331 ]




SEARCH



Mean estimation

Scalar

Scalar mean

© 2024 chempedia.info