Saddle-node point

Fig. 8.3. The approach to, or departure from, stationary-state solutions following small perturbations for simple cubic autocatalysis again showing the instability of the middle branch. The turning points (ignition and extinction) have one-sided stability as perturbations in one direction decay back to the saddle-node point, but those of the opposite sign depart for the other...

Fig. 12. Qualitative peculiarities for the dependences of relaxation times t, and t3 on PB. (a) (xa, y0) eVj (b) (x, v0)cV2 (c) (x0Iy0)eV3. V, V2, and V3 are the attraction regions determined by separatrices of saddle-node points of various steady states.

Figure 5.18. The tangential pinch in rectifying section for the acetone(l)-benzene(2)- chloroform(3) mixture for the split 1,3 2 (a) sharp separation (the tangential-pinch region Regj g not shaded), (b) quasisharp separation. 1, 2, 3, different values of L/V and different iso-f 2 lines (thin hues) SN, saddle-node point.

Fig. 7.41 Splitting of the central diamagnetic vortex into a central saddle line and two diamagnetic vortical lines in acetylene. The asymptotic blue trajectories passing through (3 1) saddle-node points mark the intersection of the separatrices containing the TVs with the yz plane. The truncated blue line is connected to the symmetrical pattern about the other C-H bond. The diamagnetic (paramagnetic) portions of the TV ate observed around green (red) SLs...

It can be seen from Fig. 15(a) that the atom moves in a stick-slip way. In forward motion, for example, it is a stick phase from A to B during which the atom stays in a metastable state with little change in position as the support travels forward. Meanwhile, the lateral force gradually climbs up in the same period, leading to an accumulation of elastic energy, as illustrated in Fig. 15(fo). When reaching the point B where a saddle-node bifurcation appears, the metastable... 

The lower a graph is more interesting. While initially the Poincar6 phase portrait looks the same as before (point E, inset 2c) an interval of hysteresis is observed. The saddle-node bifurcation of the pericxiic solutions occurs off the invariant circle, and a region of two distinct attractors ensues a stable, quasiperiodic one and a stable periodic one (Point F, inset 2d). The boundary of the basins of attraction of these two attractors is the one-dimensional (for the map) stable manifold of the saddle-type periodic solutions, SA and SB. One side of the unstable manifold will get attract to one attractor (SC to the invariant circle) while the other side will approach die other attractor (SD to die periodic solution). 

Figure 39, Chapter 3. Bifurcation diagrams for the model of the Calvin cycle for selected parameters. All saturation parameters are fixed to specific values, and two parameters are varied. Shown is the number of real parts of eigenvalues larger than zero (color coded), with blank corresponding to the stable region. The stability of the steady state is either lost via a Hopf (HO), or via saddle node (SN) bifurcations, with either two or one eigenvalue crossing the imaginary axis, respectively. Intersections point to complex (quasiperiodic or chaotic) dynamics. See text for details.

While the conditions 1,2 can be verified approximately by simulation, proving the condition 3 is very difficult. Note that in many studies of chaotic behavior of a CSTR, only the conditions 1,2 are verified, which does not imply chaotic d3mamics, from a rigorous point of view. Nevertheless, the fulfillment of conditions 1,2, can be enough to assure the long time chaotic behavior i.e. that the chaotic motion is not transitory. From the global bifurcations and catastrophe theory other chaotic behavior can be considered throughout the disappearance of a saddle-node fixed point [10], [19], [26]. 

When the determinant of the Jacobian matrix becomes zero, one of the roots of (3.43) also becomes zero. This represents the point at which a node (stable or unstable depending on the sign of tr(J)) is just changing to a saddle point or vice versa. Such saddle-node bifurcations, characterized by... 

For all physically acceptable conditions, the determinant of J is positive, so we will not find saddle points or saddle-node bifurcations. We can, however, expect to find conditions under which nodal states become focal (damped oscillatory responses), i.e. where A = 0, and where focal states lose stability at Hopf bifurcations, i.e. where tr(J) = 0 and where we shall look for the onset of sustained oscillations. 

The condition tr(J) = det(J) = 0 corresponds to a Hopf bifurcation point moving exactly onto the saddle-node turning point (ignition or extinction point) on the stationary-state locus. Above the curve A the system may have two Hopf bifurcations, or it may have none as we will see in the next subsection. Below A there are two points at which tr (J) = 0, but only one of... 

Fig. 12.4. Stationary-state solutions and limit cycles for surface reaction model in presence of catalyst poison K3 = 9, k2 = 1, k3 = 0.018. There is a Hopf bifurcation on the lowest branch p = 0.0237. The resulting stable limit cycle grows as the dimensionless partial pressure increases and forms a homoclinic orbit when p = 0.0247 (see inset). The saddle-node bifurcation point is at...

Fig. 12.6. (a) Hopf bifurcation loci for the Takoudis-Schmidt Aris model with k, = 10-3 and k2 = 2x 10-3. Also shown (broken curves) are the saddle-node boundaries from Fig. 12.6. (b)-(i) The eight qualitative arrangements of Hopf and saddle-node bifurcation points. (Adapted and reprinted with permission from McKarnin, M. A. et al. (1988). Proc. R. Soc., A415,... 

We now consider the phenomenon of entrainment (the development of resonances) on the torus (Meyer, 1983). When (and if) the off-diagonal band in Fig. 6 crosses the diagonal [Figs. 6(c) and 6(f)], there exist points whose images fall on themselves they are fixed points of the map we study. These points lie on periodic trajectories that are locked on the torus. Such trajectories appear in pairs in saddle-node bifurcations and are usually termed subharmonics . When this occurs there is no quasi-periodic attractor winding around the torus surface, but the basic structure of the torus persists the invariant circle is patched up from the unstable manifolds of the periodic saddle-points with the addition of the node-periodic point (Arnol d, 1973, 1982). As we continue changing some system parameter the periodic points may come to die in another saddle-node bifurcation (see Fig. 5). Periodic trajectories thus... 

FIGURE 5 Subharmonic saddle-node bifurcations, (a). The subharmonic period 3 isola for the surface model (o/o0 = 1.4, o0 = 0.001). One coordinate of the fixed points of the third iterate of the stroboscopic map is plotted vs. the varying frequency ratio oi/eio. Six such points (S, N) exist simultaneously, three of them (N) lying on the stable node period 3 and three (S) on the saddle period 3. Notice the two triple turning point bifurcations at o>/o>o = 2.9965 and 3.0286. In (b) the PFM of these trajectories on the isola Is also plotted, (c) shows another saddle-node bifurcation occurring (for a>o = 3) as this time the forcing amplitude is increased to o/o0 = I.6SS. 

The point S of figure 8 at which the Hopf bifurcation curve crosses the boundary of the multiplicity region is not a double zero degeneracy, for the upper steady state (i.e. that with the larger 0b) is undergoing the Hopf bifurcation at the same time as the lower steady-state undergoes a saddle-node bufurcation, i.e. the conditions trJ = 0 and detJ = 0 apply at different points. It does, however, serve to show the four combinations of the two most common... 

In the 1/1 entrainment region each side of the resonance horn terminates at points C and D respectively. These points are codimension-two bifurcations and correspond to double +1 multipliers. As the saddle-node curve at the right horn boundary rises from zero amplitude towards point D, one multiplier remains at unity (the criterion for a saddle-node bifurcation) as the other free-multiplier of the saddle-node increases until it is also equal to unity upon arrival at point D. The same thing occurs for the left boundary of the resonance horn. The arc CD is also a saddle-node bifurcation curve but is different from those on the sides of the resonance horn. As arc CD is crossed from below, the period 1 saddle combines not with its companion stable node, but with the unstable node that was in the centre of the phase locked torus. As the pair collides, the invariant circle is lost and only the stable node remains. Exactly the same scenario is observed for the 1/2 resonance horn as well. 

E. This double -1 point is yet another codimension-two bifurcation, which will be discussed in detail later. Another period 1 Hopf curve extends from point F through points G and H. F is another double -1 point and, as one moves away from F along the Hopf curve, the angle at which the complex multipliers leave the unit circle decreases from it. The points G and H correspond to angles jt and ixr respectively and are hard resonances of the Hopf bifurcation because the Floquet multipliers leave the unit circle at third and fourth roots of unity, respectively. Points G and H are both important codimension-two bifurcation points and will be discussed in detail in the next section. The Hopf curves described above are for period 1 fixed points. Subharmonic solutions (fixed points of period greater than one) can also bifurcate to tori via Hopf bifurcations. Such a curve exists for period 2 and extends from point E to K, where it terminates on a period 2 saddle-node curve. The angle at which the complex Floquet multipliers leave the unit circle approaches zero at either point of the curve. 

---