Runge-Kutta stability

Thus, due to limitations on the available computer memory, DNS of homogeneous turbulent reacting flows has been limited to Sc 1 (i.e., gas-phase reactions). Moreover, because explicit ODE solvers (e.g., Runge-Kutta) are usually employed for time stepping, numerical stability puts an upper limit on reaction rate k. Although more complex... 

These Runge-Kutta methods do not require information from the past, and are very versatile if the time steps need to be adjusted as the solution evolves. The stability of the RK2 is similar to the APC2, while the RK4 has less strong conditions for stability [10]. Both are ideal for initial value problems in time or in space,... 

Coefficients au and b, are determined in order that the algorithm possesses some qualities such as stability, accuracy, etc. A classical explicit fourth-order Runge—Kutta algorithm is defined by the values... 

The method is one way to handle a stiff set of odes, and is an extension of fourth-order explicit Runge-Kutta. The function to be solved is approximated over the next time interval by a combination of a linear function of the dependent variable and a quadratic function of time (assuming that it is strongly time-dependent) and this increases the accuracy and stability of the fourth-order Runge-Kutta method considerably. Today, however, we have other methods of dealing with stiff sets of odes, so this method might be said to have outlived its usefulness. 

In ref. 143 the authors develop a third-order 3-stage diagonally implicit Runge-Kutta-Nystrom method embedded in fourth-order 4-stage for solving special second-order initial value problems. The obtained method has been developed in order to have minimal local truncation error as well as the last row of the coefficient matrix is equal to the vector output. The authors also study the stability of the method. The new proposed method is illustrated via a set of test problems. 

In ref 156 the author studies the stability properties of a family of exponentially fitted Runge-Kutta-Nystrom methods. More specifically the author investigates the P-stability which is a very important property usually required for the numerical solution of stiff oscillatory second-order initial value problems. In this paper P-stable exponentially fitted Runge-Kutta-Nystrom methods with arbitrary high order are developed. The results of this paper are proved based on a S5unmetry argument. 

In ref 161 the authors have produced exponentially-fitted BDF-Runge-Kutta type formulas (of second-, third- and fourth-order). The good behaviour of the new produced methods for stilf problems is proved. The stability regions of the new proposed methods have been examined. It is proved that the plots of their absolute stability regions include the whole of the negative real axis. Finally the author propose several procedures to find the parameter of the new methods. 

The standard Euler methods and Runge-Kutta methods do not converge for stiff ODE S. A still system can be defined as one in which the stability of the numerical methods used becomes an issue. Maple has an inbuilt stiff solver. 

This is a second-order Runge-Kutta method (Finlayson, 1980), sometimes called the midpoint rule. The first step is an approximation of the solution halfway between the beginning and ending time, and the second step evaluates the right-hand side at that mid-point. The error goes as (At), which is much smaller than that achieved with the Euler method. The second-order Runge-Kutta methods (there are several) also have a stability limitation. 

RK2SSP second-order two-stage strong stability-preserving Runge-Kutta... 

A variety of explicit (Dufort-Frankel, Lax-Wendroff, Runge-Kutta) and implicit (approximate factorization, LU-SGS) or hybrid schemes have been employed for integration in time. Because of the complexity of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations, stability analyses to determine critical time steps are difficult. As a general rule, the allowable time step for an explicit method is proportional to the ratio of the smallest grid size to the largest convective velocity (or the wave propagation speed for an artificial compressibility method). 

The interval of absolute stability for four-stage Runge-Kutta is (-2.78,0). If the numerical solution is to converge to the theoretical solution, the step size h must be selected such that -2.78 monotonically decreasing function of x, the maximum value of y is y(0) = 1, and the minimum oih = -100ft < 2.78. For ft = 0.01 and 0.02, ft = -1, -2, respectively, which remain in the interval of absolute stability. For ft = 0.04, h = -A, which falls outside of the interval of absolute stability. Hence, the numerical solution diverges for ft = 0.04. 

By selecting a time step that is suitably small, appropriate accuracy and stability can be achieved. In two- and three-Cartesian dimensions, these difference equations are separable in position, velocity, and acceleration. Runge-Kutta methods (or other) can be used for more accuracy at larger time steps. When collisions occur, momentum and center of mass are used for additional solution constraints. To make this all more tangible, weTl look at some specific systems. 

---