Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Runge explicit

Thus we find that the choice of quaternion variables introduces barriers to efficient symplectic-reversible discretization, typically forcing us to use some off-the-shelf explicit numerical integrator for general systems such as a Runge-Kutta or predictor-corrector method. [Pg.355]

Runge-Kutta methods are explicit methods that use several function evaluations for each time step. Runge-Kutta methods are traditionally written for/(f, y). The first-order Runge-Kutta method is Euler s method. A second-order Runge-Kutta method is... [Pg.473]

To check the effect of integration, the following algorithms were tried Euler, explicit Runge-Kutta, semi-implicit and implicit Runge-Kutta with stepwise adjustment. All gave essentially identical results. In most cases, equations do not get stiff before the onset of temperature runaway. Above that, results are not interesting since tubular reactors should not be... [Pg.168]

Variable step, 5th-order, Runge-Kutta explicit method (ALGO = 0). [Pg.125]

Thus, due to limitations on the available computer memory, DNS of homogeneous turbulent reacting flows has been limited to Sc 1 (i.e., gas-phase reactions). Moreover, because explicit ODE solvers (e.g., Runge-Kutta) are usually employed for time stepping, numerical stability puts an upper limit on reaction rate k. Although more complex... [Pg.122]

For simple systems, the McDowell molecular-orbital technique would seem to be more time-consuming than that of SJG. In more complicated situations, however, this approach should lead to more accurate results, not only by using a Runge-Kutta rather than Euler method, but also by employing directly Ps(e), rather than its Fourier transform Gi(tX whose explicit form may not be known. [Pg.355]

Equation (2.53) can be solved numerically by the Runge-Kutta method (see Appendix 2A). Explicit solutions of (2.53) are given here. [Pg.33]

There are several methods that we can use to increase the order of approximation of the integral in eqn. (8.72). Two of the most common higher order explicit methods are the Adams-Bashforth (AB2) and the Runge-Kutta of second and fourth order. The Adams-Bashforth is a second order method that uses a combination of the past value of the function, as in the explicit method depicted in Fig. 8.19, and an average of the past two values, similar to the Crank-Nicholson method depicted in Fig. 8.21, and written as... [Pg.422]

This method often requires very small integration step sizes to obtain a desired level of accuracy. Runge-Kutta integration has a higher level of accuracy than Euler. It is also an explicit integration technique, since the state values at the next time step are only a function of the previous time step. Implicit methods have state variable values that are a function of both the beginning and end of the current... [Pg.132]

Depending on the numerical techniques available for integration of the model equations, model reformulation or simplified version of the original model has always been the first step. In the Sixties and Seventies simplified models as sets of ordinary differential equations (ODEs) were developed. Explicit Euler method or explicit Runge-Kutta method (Huckaba and Danly, 1960 Domenech and Enjalbert, 1981 Coward, 1967 Robinson, 1969, 1970 etc) were used to integrate such model equations. The ODE models ignored column holdup and therefore non-stiff integration techniques were suitable for those models. [Pg.108]

In order to find the Hamiltonian for which the wave function (93) is the exact ground state wave function, it is necessary to consider what states are present on the two nearest rungs in It turns out that there are only 16 states from the total 256 ones in the product i Xfi(i)g i up(i + 1). The local Hamiltonian hi acting on two nearest rungs i and i + 1 can be written in the form of (87) with the projectors onto the 240 missing states. The total Hamiltonian is the sum of local ones (85). The explicit form of this Hamiltonian is very cumbersome and, therefore, it is not given here. [Pg.804]

Coefficients au and b, are determined in order that the algorithm possesses some qualities such as stability, accuracy, etc. A classical explicit fourth-order Runge—Kutta algorithm is defined by the values... [Pg.299]

In general, a Rosenbrock method consists of a number s of stages. At each stage, a Runge-Kutta-type ki value is calculated, from explicit rearrangement of implicit equations for these. At stage i, the equation is... [Pg.69]

The method is one way to handle a stiff set of odes, and is an extension of fourth-order explicit Runge-Kutta. The function to be solved is approximated over the next time interval by a combination of a linear function of the dependent variable and a quadratic function of time (assuming that it is strongly time-dependent) and this increases the accuracy and stability of the fourth-order Runge-Kutta method considerably. Today, however, we have other methods of dealing with stiff sets of odes, so this method might be said to have outlived its usefulness. [Pg.186]


See other pages where Runge explicit is mentioned: [Pg.296]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.474]    [Pg.475]    [Pg.478]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.622]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.1162]    [Pg.193]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.54 , Pg.55 ]




SEARCH



Explicitness

Runge

Rungs

© 2024 chempedia.info