RRKM theory coordinate

Variational RRKM theory is particularly important for imimolecular dissociation reactions, in which vibrational modes of the reactant molecule become translations and rotations in the products [22]. For CH —> CHg+H dissociation there are tlnee vibrational modes of this type, i.e. the C—H stretch which is the reaction coordinate and the two degenerate H—CH bends, which first transfomi from high-frequency to low-frequency vibrations and then hindered rotors as the H—C bond ruptures. These latter two degrees of freedom are called transitional modes [24,25]. C2Hg 2CH3 dissociation has five transitional modes, i.e. two pairs of degenerate CH rocking/rotational motions and the CH torsion. 

The Transition State Hypothesis. The general idea that a transition state is located at a saddle point on the PES, as detailed in Section 1.3, is familiar to most organic chemists. However, the original concept of a transition state started out as something rather different. In the development of both transition state and RRKM theory, the transition state was defined as the location of a plane (actually a hyperplane) in phase space, perpendicular to the reaction coordinate. ... 

The RRKM theory is a ubiquitous tool for studying dissociation or isomerization rates of molecules as a function of their vibrational energy. Still highly active in the theoretical field, Marcus has tackled such issues as the semiclassical theory for inelastic and reactive collisions, devising reaction coordinates, new tunneling paths, and exploring solvent dynamics effects on unim-olecular reactions in clusters. 

RRKM theory, an approach to the calculation of the rate constant of indirect reactions that, essentially, is equivalent to transition-state theory. The reaction coordinate is identified as being the coordinate associated with the decay of an activated complex. It is a statistical theory based on the assumption that every state, within a narrow energy range of the activated complex, is populated with the same probability prior to the unimolecular reaction. The microcanonical rate constant k(E) is given by an expression that contains the ratio of the sum of states for the activated complex (with the reaction coordinate omitted) and the total density of states of the reactant. The canonical k(T) unimolecular rate constant is given by an expression that is similar to the transition-state theory expression of bimolecular reactions. 

The first assumption, that phase space is populated statistically prior to reaction, implies that the ratio of activated complexes to reactants is obtained by the evaluation of the ratio between the respective volumes in phase space. If this assumption is not fulfilled, then the rate constant k(E, t) may depend on time and it will be different from rrkm(E). If, for example, the initial excitation is localized in the reaction coordinate, k(E,t) will be larger than A rrkm(A). However, when the initially prepared state has relaxed via IVR, the rate constant will coincide with the predictions of RRKM theory (provided the other assumptions of the theory are fulfilled). 

Perhaps the point to emphasise in discussing theories of translational energy release is that the quasiequilibrium theory (QET) neither predicts nor seeks to describe energy release [576, 720], Neither does the Rice— Ramspergei Kassel—Marcus (RRKM) theory, which for the purposes of this discussion is equivalent to QET. Additional assumptions are necessary before QET can provide a basis for prediction of energy release (see Sect. 8.1.1) and the nature of these assumptions is as fundamental as the assumption of energy randomisation (ergodic hypothesis) or that of separability of the transition state reaction coordinate (Sect. 2.1). The only exception arises, in a sense by definition, with the case of the loose transition state [Sect. 8.1.1(a)]. 

The RRKM theory is a transition state theory with the reaction coordinate treated classically. It inherits any defects of the parent, separability of coordinates, non-equilibrium effects, and the assumption of unit transmission coefficient (trajectories do not turn back to regenerate X ). It is expected to give an upper bound to the reaction rate in cases where tunnelling through the potential energy barrier is... 

This standard mechanistic analysis has a long successful history. Organic chemistry textbooks are filled with PESs and discussions of the implication of single-step versus multiple-step mechanisms, concerted TSs, and so on. - Transition state theory (TST) and Rice-Ramsperger-Kassel-Marcus (RRKM) theory provide tools for predicting rates based upon simple assumptions built upon the notion of reaction on the PES following the reaction coordinate. " ... 

Variational transition state theory was suggested by Keck [36] and developed by Truhlar and others [37,38]. Although this method was originally applied to canonical transition state theory, for which there is a unique optimal transition state, it can be applied in a much more detailed way to RRKM theory, in which the transition state can be separately optimized for each energy and angular momentum [37,39,40]. This form of variational microcanonical transition state theory is discussed at length in Chapter 2, where there is also a discussion of the variational optimization of the reaction coordinate. 

Because there is a unique one-to-one correlation of reactant states and product states over the reaction coordinate, the sum of the number of open channels may be made over the product states, rather than in the transition state region, as is necessary for RRKM theory. 

The basic assumptions of SACM appear to be entirely different from the RRKM theory. In SACM the adiabatic channels do not mix, whereas in RRKM theory the rate coefficient is calculated on the assumption of rapid redistribution of vibrational energy into the reaction coordinate. However, as stated above, the adiabatic property of SACM does not hold strictly, it is only necessary for the counting of channels to be correct. In this sense SACM can be thought of as a fully quantized version of RRKM theory, as stated in Chapter 2. 

The proper evaluation of the quantized energy levels within the SACM requires a separable reaction coordinate and thus numerical implementations have implicitly assumed a center-of-mass separation distance for the reaction coordinate, as in flexible RRKM theory. Under certain reasonable limits the underlying adiabatic channel approximation can be shown to be equivalent to the variational RRKM approximations. Thus, the key difference between flexible RRKM theory and the SACM is in the focus on the underlying potential energy surface in flexible RRKM theory as opposed to empirical interpolation schemes in the SACM. Forst s recent implementation of micro-variational RRKM theory [210], which is based on interpolations of product and reactant canonical partition functions, provides what might be considered as an intermediate between these two theories. 

Flexible RRKM theory and the reaction path Hamiltonian approach take two quite different perspectives in their evaluation of the transition state partition functions. In flexible RRKM theory the reaction coordinate is implicitly assumed to be that which is appropriate at infinite separation and one effectively considers perturbations from the energies of the separated fragments. In contrast, the reaction path Hamiltonian approach considers a perspective that is appropriate for the molecular complex. Furthermore, the reaction path Hamiltonian approach with normal mode vibrations emphasizes the local area of the potential along the minimum energy path, whereas flexible RRKM theory requires a global potential for the transitional modes. One might well imagine that each of these perspectives is more or less appropriate under various conditions. 

Potential energy surfaces in variable reaction coordinate RRKM theory... 

The irregular trajectories in Fig. 15.6 display the type of motion expected by RRKM theory. These trajectories moves chaotically throughout the coordinate space, not restricted to any particular type of motion. RRKM theory requires this type of irregular motion for all of the trajectories so that the intramolecular dynamics is ergodic [1]. In addition, for RRKM behavior the rate of intramolecular relaxation associated with the ergodicity must be sufficiently rapid so that a microcanonical ensemble is maintained as the molecule decomposes [1]. This assures the RRKM rate constant k E) for each time interval f —> f + df. If the ergodic intramolecular relaxation is slower than l/k(E), the unimolecular dynamics will be intrinsically non-RRKM. 

---