Rotational Zeeman interaction

This term describes the electronic contribution to the rotational g-factor. The contribution (7.223) represents the interaction between the applied magnetic field By and the magnetic moment produced by the electrons in the molecule as it rotates in laboratory space. It has an operator form identical to that of the first-order nuclear orbital (i.e. rotational) Zeeman interaction... 

These represent the nuclear spin Zeeman interaction, the rotational Zeeman interaction, the nuclear spin-rotation interaction, the nuclear spin-nuclear spin dipolar interaction, and the diamagnetic interactions. Using irreducible tensor methods we examine the matrix elements of each of these five terms in turn, working first in the decoupled basis set rj J, Mj /, Mi), where rj specifies all other electronic and vibrational quantum numbers this is the basis which is most appropriate for high magnetic field studies. In due course we will also calculate the matrix elements and energy levels in a ry, J, I, F, Mf) coupled basis which is appropriate for low field investigations. Most of the experimental studies involved ortho-H2 in its lowest rotational level, J = 1. If the proton nuclear spins are denoted I and /2, each with value 1 /2, ortho-H2 has total nuclear spin / equal to 1. Para-H2 has a total nuclear spin / equal to 0. 

Figure 8.36. Energy level diagram showing the nuclear spin Zeeman energies for the 7Li and 79Br nuclei in LiBr. The nuclear g-factor for 7Li (3.256) is larger than that for 79Br (2.106). Each level shown is split into a further triplet by the rotational Zeeman interaction which removes the Mj threefold-degeneracy for J = 1.

The Zeeman Hamiltonian given in equation (8.322) is sufficient to provide a semi-quantitative description of the magnetic effects but, as was described in our discussion of the magnetic resonance spectrum of H2, it is an approximate form. The local magnetic field experienced by the H and F nuclei is not quite the same as the applied laboratory field because of shielding effects due to the surrounding electrons. In addition the rotational Zeeman interaction should be described not by the single constant... 

The final term in equation (9.55) is the rotational Zeeman interaction whose matrix elements are again obtained by remaining in the space-fixed axis system ... 

By replacing /V by ( J — S), we see that the rotational Zeeman interaction has straightforward diagonal matrix elements only ... 

OIDEP usually results from Tq-S mixing in radical pairs, although T i-S mixing has also been considered (Atkins et al., 1971, 1973). The time development of electron-spin state populations is a function of the electron Zeeman interaction, the electron-nuclear hyperfine interaction, the electron-electron exchange interaction, together with spin-rotational and orientation dependent terms (Pedersen and Freed, 1972). Electron spin lattice relaxation Ti = 10 to 10 sec) is normally slower than the polarizing process. 

Prior to an effective Hamiltonian analysis it is, in order to get this converging to the lowest orders, typical to remove the dominant rf irradiation from the description by transforming the internal Hamiltonian into the interaction frame of the rf irradiation. This procedure is well established and also used in the most simple description of NMR experiments by transforming the Hamiltonian into the rotating frame of the Zeeman interaction (the so-called Zeeman interaction frame). In the Zeeman interaction frame the time-modulations of the rf terms are removed and the internal Hamiltonian is truncated to form the secular high-field approximated Hamiltonian - all facilitating solution of the Liouville-von-Neumann equation in (1) and (2). The transformation into the rf interaction frame is given by... 

Let us calculate the frequencies of transitions between Zeeman eigenstates s) and r), assuming that the nuclei are only subjected to an isotropic chemical shift and the first- and second-order quadrupolar interaction. As seen in Sect. 2.1, the Hamiltonian that governs the spin system in the frame of the Zeeman interaction (the rotating frame) is... 

The basic idea of the slow-motion theory is to treat the electron spin as a part of the lattice and limit the spin part of the problem to the nuclear spin rather than the IS system. The difficult part of the problem is to treat, in an appropriate way, the combined lattice, now containing the classical degrees of freedom (such as rotation in condensed matter) as well as quantized degrees of freedom (such as the electron Zeeman interaction). The Liouville superoperator formalism is very well suited for treating this type of problems. 

The simplest possible physical picture of the lattice contains the electron Zeeman interaction, the axially symmetric ZFS (whose principal axis coincides with the dipole-dipole axis) and the molecular rotation. The corresponding Liouvillian is given by ... 

Bertini and co-workers 119) and Kruk et al. 96) formulated a theory of electron spin relaxation in slowly-rotating systems valid for arbitrary relation between the static ZFS and the Zeeman interaction. The unperturbed, static Hamiltonian was allowed to contain both these interactions. Such an unperturbed Hamiltonian, Hq, depends on the relative orientation of the molecule-fixed P frame and the laboratory frame. For cylindrically symmetric ZFS, we need only one angle, p, to specify the orientation of the two frames. The eigenstates of Hq(P) were used to define the basis set in which the relaxation superoperator Rzpsi ) expressed. The superoperator M, the projection vectors and the electron-spin spectral densities cf. Eqs. (62-64)), all become dependent on the angle p. The expression in Eq. (61) needs to be modified in two ways first, we need to include the crossterms electron-spin spectral densities, and These terms can be... 

As with the Zeeman interaction discussed earlier, (1.43) is usually contracted to the space-fixed p = 0 component. An extremely important difference, however, is that in contrast to the nuclear spin Zeeman effect, the Stark effect in a 1Z state is second-order, which means that the electric field mixes different rotational levels. This aspect is thoroughly discussed in the second half of chapter 8 the second-order Stark effect is the engine of molecular beam electric resonance studies, and the spectra, such as that of CsF discussed earlier, are usually recorded in the presence of an applied electric field. 

The first term of (3.289) represents a translational Stark effect. A molecule with a permanent dipole moment experiences a moving magnetic field as an electric field and hence shows an interaction the term could equally well be interpreted as a Zeeman effect. The second term represents the nuclear rotation and vibration Zeeman interactions we shall deal with this more fully below. The fourth term gives the interaction of the field with the orbital motion of the electrons and its small polarisation correction. The other terms are probably not important but are retained to preserve the gauge invariance of the Hamiltonian. For an ionic species (q 0) we have the additional translational term... 

Here, co represents the Euler angles (orbital Zeeman interaction, we see that it has off-diagonal matrix elements which link electronic states with A A = 0, 1, as well as purely diagonal elements. It is clearly desirable to remove the effect of these matrix elements by a suitable perturbative transformation to achieve an effective Zeeman Hamiltonian which acts only within the spin-rotational levels of a given electronic state rj, A, v), in the same way as the zero-field effective Hamiltonian in equation (7.183). 

It should be appreciated that the Zeeman interactions are usually dominated by the first two terms in (7.232), the electron spin and orbital terms. The other terms are typically between two and four orders of magnitude smaller. For a molecule in a closed shell1 state, only the rotational Zeeman term, the nuclear spin contribution and the susceptibility term survive. 

We will now proceed to combine our knowledge of the rigid body rotation with the Zeeman interactions discussed in part ( ). 

Somewhat similar conclusions apply to the rotational magnetic moment g tensor for a diatomic molecule. The component of the moment of inertia tensor along the intemuclear axis is zero, and the two perpendicular components are, of course, equal. Consequently the rotational magnetic moment Zeeman interaction can be represented by the simple term... 

We are now in a position to examine the details of the Zeeman effect in the para-H2, TV = 2 level, and thereby to understand Lichten s magnetic resonance studies. For each Mj component we may set up an energy matrix, using equations (8.180) and (8.181) which describe the Zeeman interactions, and equations (8.201), (8.206) and (8.214) which give the zero-field energies. Since Mj = 3 components exist only for J = 3, diagonalisation in this case is not required. For Mj = 2 the J = 2 and 3 states are involved. For Mj = 0 and I, however, the matrices involve all three fine-structure states and take the form shown below in table 8.7. Note that /. is equal to a0 + 3 63-2/4 and the spin-rotation terms have been omitted. The diagonal Zeeman matrix elements are... 

The effective Hamiltonian used by Cecchi and Ramsey [63] to analyse the strong magnetic field spectrum was the sum of four terms, describing the molecular rotation, nuclear spin interactions, Stark interactions and Zeeman interactions. Specifically the Hamiltonian is the following,... 

---