Ribosomal proteins, preparation from

Fig. 15. Proteins of 52 S chloroplast ribosomal subunits prepared from wild-type and ery-Ula strains of C. reinhardi. The proteins were separated by electrophoresis in urea-polyacrylamide gel cylinders (left to right horizontally) and then by electrophoresis in sodium dodecylsulfate in a polyacrylamide slab (from top to bottom). Only portions of the slabs are shown. The lower slab contains proteins from wild-type cells the upper one contains proteins from ery-Ula cells. The position of the missing protein, LC4, is shown by a circle surprinted on the upper slab. Some new bands of equal electrophoretic mobility in urea gels, but of higher molecular weight (in increments) than the wild-type LC4, are seen in the upper gel above the circle. LC4 of ery-Ula appears to aggregate. Ery-Ula is a uniparentally-transmitted character. (From Mets and Bogorad. )...

Although ribosomal proteins are readily observed as in Figures 13.7 and 13.8 altered matrix conditions can alter the relative ionization of bacterial whole-cell compounds. A systematic analysis involving laser power/fluence and sample preparation conditions reveals that if the concentrated trifluo-roacetic acid is added and the laser power increased above optimal conditions, ionization of bacterial surface compounds can be enhanced. Figure 13.9 is the resulting 9.4 T MALDI-FTMS, seen are both the Braun s lipoprotein56,57 and the Murein lipoprotein. Both of these compounds are complex combinations of hydrocarbon lipids attached to a protein base. This is the first MALDI-FTMS observation of surface proteins desorbed directly from whole cells by influencing ionization conditions. 

As discussed above, it appears from physical studies, especially with the NMR technique, that the tertiary structure of ribosomal proteins isolated in the presence of 6 M urea and then carefully renatured under appropriate conditions is very similar to those proteins prepared in the complete absence of urea. 

Ribosomes were discovered by electron micros-copists examining the structure of the endoplasmic reticulum using ultrathin sectioning techniques. Their presence in cells was established by 1956, and the name ribosome was proposed in 1957. At first it was difficult to study protein synthesis in vitro using isolated ribosomes. No net synthesis could be detected until Hoagland and associates measured the rate of incorporation of 14C-labeled amino acids into protein.26 This sensitive method permitted measurement of very small amounts of protein synthesis in cell-free preparations from rat liver and paved the way toward studies with ribosomes themselves. 

Like most trace elements, nickel can activate various enzymes in vitro, but no enzyme has been shown to require nickel, specifically, to be activated. Howevei, mease has been shown to be a nickel metalloenzyme and has been found to contain 6 to 8 atoms of nickel per mole of enzyme (Fishbein et al.. 1976). RNA (ribonucleic add) preparations from diverse sources consistently contain nickel in concentrations many times higher than those found in native materials from which the RNA ts isolated (Wacker-Vallee, 1959 Sunderman, 1965). Nickel may serve to stabilize the ordered structure of RNA. Nickel may have a role in maintaining ribosomal structure (Tal, 1968, 1969). These studies and other information have led to the suggestion that nickel may play a role in nucleic acid and/or protein metabolism. 

Arrangement of components in the E. coli 30S ribosomal particle. In (a) the relative locations of the ribosomal proteins, numbered 1-21, are shown. (Illustration prepared by Dr. Malcolm Capel from data described in M. S. Capel, M. Kjeldguard, D. M. Engelman,. /. Mol. Biol. 200 66-87,... 

Ribosomes contain a channel in which a strand of mRNA binds. During translation, a ribosome slides along a strand of mRNA from the 5 end to the 3 end (Scheme 6.5). As the mRNA code is read, the ribosome synthesizes a new protein from the A-terminus to the C-terminus. The protein is prepared from amino acids that are delivered by another form of RNA called tRNA, which is described in the next subsection. Multiple ribosomes can simultaneously translate a single mRNA strand. 

Madin, K., Sawasaki, T., Ogasawara, T., and Endo, Y. (2000) A highly efficient and robust cell-free protein synthesis system prepared from wheat embiyos plants apparently contain a suicide system directed at ribosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 559-564. 

Fig. 2. Removal of tritin from embryos. Extracts were prepared from unwashed or washed embryos (A) and the depurination assay was performed (B). Translation mixtures prepared with the extract from unwashed embryos were incubated for 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 h (lanes 1-5, respectively) mixtures with washed embryos were incubated for 0, 2, 4 h (lanes 10-12, respectively). Isolated RNA was treated with acid/aniline, and then separated on 4.5% polyacrylamide gels. Additionally, RNA was directly extracted from embryos with guanidine isothiocyanate-phenol and analyzed before (lane 7) and after (lane 8) treatment with acid/aniline. For the fragment marker, incubation was carried out in the presence of gypsophilin, a highly active ribosome-inactivating protein from Gypsophila elegance the arrow indicates the aniline-induced fragment.

In ribosome display, the physical link between genotype and phenotype is accomplished by mRNA-ribosome—protein complexes, which are directly used for selection. If a library of different mRNA molecules is translated, a protein library results in which each protein is produced from its own mRNA and remains connected to it. Since these complexes of the proteins and their encoding mRNAs are stable for several days under the appropriate conditions, very stringent selections can be performed. As all steps of ribosome display are carried out in vitro, reaction conditions of the individual steps can be tailored to the requirements of the protein species investigated, as well as the objectives of the selection or evolution experiment. Application of ribosome display has produced scFv fragments of antibodies with affinities in the picomolar range from libraries prepared from immunized mice (Hanes et al., 1998) and more recently from a naive, completely synthetic library (Hanes et al., 2000), and has been used to evolve improved off-rates and stability (Jermutus et al., 2000). 

Cocucci, S. and Bagni, N., Polyamine-induced activation of protein synthesis in ribosomal preparation from Helianthus tuberosus tissue, Life Sci., 7, 113-120, 1968. 

The aminoacyl transfer reaction, one of the latter stages in protein synthesis, involves incorporation of amino acids from soluble ribonucleic acid-amino acid into ribosomal protein. This reaction requires guanosine triphosphate and a soluble portion of the cell. Evidence has been obtained with rat liver preparations that aminoacyl transfer is catalyzed by two protein factors, aminoacyl transferases (or polymerases) I and n, which have been resolved and partially purified from the soluble fraction. Transferase n activity has also been obtained from deoxycholate-soluble extracts of microsomes. With purified transferases I and n, incorporation is observed with relatively low levels of GTP its sulfhy-dryl requirement is met by a variety of compounds. The characteristics of this purified amino acid incorporating system, in terms of dependency on the concentration of its components, are described. 

Figure 1 represents a schematic illustration of the separation of ribosomes, sRNA, and the enzymes involved in the transfer reaction, described in detail below. At the end of the incubation period, the ribonucleoprotein and supernatant fractions were separated by ultracentrifugation, the perchloric acid-insoluble fraction was prepared from each, and the nucleic acids and proteins were isolated from the acid-insoluble residue (17). 

Incubations of crude pH 5 Supernatant with several C14-aminoacyl sRNA preparations, differing only in the nature of the C14-amino acid, showed that all amino acids tested were incorporated into ribosomal protein. With combined transferases I and n, the results presented in Table VII indicated that all of the amino acids tested were also incorporated in the presence of these purified fractions (8). When either of the transferases was omitted from these incubations, little amino acid transfer was observed with any of the C14-aminoacyl sRNA preparations. Variations in total amounts of C14 incorporated, as shown here, are probably due to variations in the specific radioactivity of the various sRNA-bound amino acids used. These purified transferase preparations did not catalyze the incorporation of free amino acids into sRNA or ribosomes. 

---