Reverse microscopic image

UVA light (320-400 nm) can cause reversible corneal damage on short exposure, while UVB (280-320 nm) or long exposure to UVA can produce cataracts and damage to the lens. It is most convenient to view UV microscope images with a small TV camera fitted with a UV sensitive vidicon tube. The samples of interest in UV microscopy absorb strongly in the UV but are usually transparent in the visible. In order that a UV absorbing compound may be seen in a sample it is necessary to remove that part of the spectral output of the lamp (usually visible) which is not absorbed by the sample. 

Figure 30.7 Microscopic image of the reverse mesa waveguide cross section (a) and the schematic illustration (b). (Adapted with permission from Ref. [51].)...

We now introduce the principle of microscopic reversibility. This states that the transition states for any pathway for an elementary reaction in forward and reverse directions are related as mirror images. The atoms are in the same places but the momentum vectors are, of course, reversed since in general the transition state is proceeding in one direction only. In other words, the forward and reverse mechanisms are identical, according to this principle. 

Fig. 13.8. Atomic metallic ion emission and nanotip formation, (a) At high temperature, the atoms on a W tip becomes mobile. The tip surface is macroscopically flat but microscopically rough, (b) By applying a high field (1.2-1.8 V/A,), the W atoms move to the protrusions, (c) The apex atom has the highest probability to be ionized and leave the tip. The W ions form an image of the tip on the fluorescence screen, (d) A well-defined pyramidal protrusion, often ended with a single atom, is formed. By cooling down the tip and reversing the bias, a field-emission image is observed on the fluorescence screen. The patterns are almost identical. (Reproduced from Binh and Garcia, 1992, with permission.)...

To improve the lateral resolution of the microscope, Muller tried in 1951 to use desorbed ions from a surface to form an image by reversing the polarity of the tip voltage, and also by introducing hydrogen into the... 

In addition, this CTF is attenuated by an envelope or damping function, which depends on the coherence of the beam, specimen drift, and other factors (6,71,72). Figure 14.5 shows a few representative CTFs for different amounts of defocus on a normal and a FEG microscope. Thus, for a particular defocus setting of the objective lens, phase contrast in the electron image is positive and maximal only at a few specific spatial frequencies. Contrast is either lower than maximal, completely absent, or it is opposite (inverted or reversed) from that at other frequencies. Hence, as the objective lens is focused, the electron microscopist selectively accentuates image details of a particular size. 

Several far-field light microscopy methods have recently been developed to break the diffraction limit. These methods can be largely divided into two categories (1) techniques that employ spatially patterned illumination to sharpen the point-spread function of the microscope, such as stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy and related methods using other reversibly saturable optically linear fluorescent transitions (RESOLFT) [1,2], and saturated structured-illumination microscopy (SSIM) [3], and (2) a technique that is based on the localization of individual fluorescent molecules, termed Stochastic Optical Reconstruction Microscopy (STORM [4], Photo-Activated Localization Microscopy (PALM) [5], or Fluorescence Photo-Activation Localization Microscopy (FPALM) [6]. In this paper, we describe the concept of STORM microscopy and recent advances in the imaging capabilities of STORM. 

---