Wavefunction restricted

The preceding development of the HF theory assumed a closed-shell wavefunction. The wavefunction for an individual electron describes its spatial extent along with its spin. The electron can be either spin up (a) or spin down (P). For the closed-shell wavefunction, each pair of electrons shares the same spatial orbital but each has a different spin—one is up and the other is down. This type of wavefunction is also called a (spin)-restricted wavefunction since the paired electrons are restricted to the same spatial orbital, leading to the restricted Hartree-Fock (RHF) method. 

Electrons, protons and neutrons and all other particles that have s = are known as fennions. Other particles are restricted to s = 0 or 1 and are known as bosons. There are thus profound differences in the quantum-mechanical properties of fennions and bosons, which have important implications in fields ranging from statistical mechanics to spectroscopic selection mles. It can be shown that the spin quantum number S associated with an even number of fennions must be integral, while that for an odd number of them must be half-integral. The resulting composite particles behave collectively like bosons and fennions, respectively, so the wavefunction synnnetry properties associated with bosons can be relevant in chemical physics. One prominent example is the treatment of nuclei, which are typically considered as composite particles rather than interacting protons and neutrons. Nuclei with even atomic number tlierefore behave like individual bosons and those with odd atomic number as fennions, a distinction that plays an important role in rotational spectroscopy of polyatomic molecules. 

These limitations lead to electron spin multiplicity restrictions and to differing nuclear spin statistical weights for the rotational levels. Writing the electronic wavefunction as the product of an orbital fiinction and a spin fiinction there are restrictions on how these functions can be combined. The restrictions are imposed by the fact that the complete function has to be of synnnetry... 

A completely difierent approach to scattering involves writing down an expression that can be used to obtain S directly from the wavefunction, and which is stationary with respect to small errors in die waveftmction. In this case one can obtain the scattering matrix element by variational theory. A recent review of this topic has been given by Miller [32]. There are many different expressions that give S as a ftmctional of the wavefunction and, therefore, there are many different variational theories. This section describes the Kohn variational theory, which has proven particularly useftil in many applications in chemical reaction dynamics. To keep the derivation as simple as possible, we restrict our consideration to potentials of die type plotted in figure A3.11.1(c) where the waveftmcfton vanishes in the limit of v -oo, and where the Smatrix is a scalar property so we can drop the matrix notation. 

A basis set is the mathematical description of the orbitals within a system (which in turn combine to approximate the total electronic wavefunction) used to perform the theoretical calculation. Larger basis sets more accurately approximate the orbitals by imposing fewer restrictions on the locations of the electrons in space. In the true quantum mechanical picture, electrons have a finite probability of existing anywhere in space this limit corresponds to the infinite basis set expansion in the chart we looked at previously. 

The theory behind body-fixed representations and the associated angular momentum function expansions of the wavefunction (or wave packet) in terms of bases parameterized by the relevant constants of the motion and approximate constants of the motion is highly technical. Some pertinent results will simply be stated. The two good constants of the motion are total angular momentum, J, and parity, p = +1 or 1. An approximate constant of the motion is K, the body-fixed projection of total angular momentum on the body-fixed axis. For simplicity, we will restrict attention to the helicity-decoupled or centrifugal sudden (CS) approximation in which K can be assumed to be a constant of the motion. In terms of aU its components, and the iteration number k, the real wave packet is taken to be [21]... 

As well known, this condition is not a restriction whenever the wavefunction is invariant under an unitary transformation [2],... 

It is possible to construct a HF method for open-shell molecules that does maintain the proper spin symmetry. It is known as the restricted open-shell HF (ROHF) method. Rather than dividing the electrons into spin-up and spin-down classes, the ROHF method partitions the electrons into closed- and open-shell. In the easiest case of the high-spin wavefunction ( op = — electrons in op... 

These restrictions, imposed above on electrons, apply equally to all pariiqles that are represented by antisymmetric wavefunctions, the so-called Fermions. The condition that no more than one particle can occupy a given quantum state leads immediately to the expression for the number of possible combinations. If C nhgi) is the number of combinations that can be made with g, particles taken tii at a time,... 

To distinguish between closed-shell and open-shell configurations (and determinants), one may generally include a prefix to specify whether the starting HF wavefunction is of restricted closed-shell (R), restricted open-shell (RO), or unrestricted (U) form. (The restricted forms are total S2 spin eigenfunctions, but the unrestricted form need not be.) Thus, the abbreviations RHF, ROHF, and UHF refer to the spin-restricted closed-shell, spin-restricted open-shell, and unrestricted HF methods, respectively. 

Perturbative approximation methods are usually based on the Mpller-Plesset (MP) perturbation theory for correcting the HF wavefunction. Energetic corrections may be calculated to second (MP2), third (MP3), or higher order. As usual, the open- versus closed-shell character of the wavefunction can be specified by an appropriate prefix, such as ROMP2 or UMP2 for restricted open-shell or unrestricted MP2, respectively. 

In a recent analysis carried out for a bounded open system with a classically chaotic Hamiltonian, it has been argued that the weak form of the QCT is achieved by two parallel processes (B. Greenbaum et.al., ), explaining earlier numerical results (S. Habib et.al., 1998). First, the semiclassical approximation for quantum dynamics, which breaks down for classically chaotic systems due to overwhelming nonlocal interference, is recovered as the environmental interaction filters these effects. Second, the environmental noise restricts the foliation of the unstable manifold (the set of points which approach a hyperbolic point in reverse time) allowing the semiclassical wavefunction to track this modified classical geometry. 

Both the initial- and the final-state wavefunctions are stationary solutions of their respective Hamiltonians. A transition between these states must be effected by a perturbation, an interaction that is not accounted for in these Hamiltonians. In our case this is the electronic interaction between the reactant and the electrode. We assume that this interaction is so small that the transition probability can be calculated from first-order perturbation theory. This limits our treatment to nonadiabatic reactions, which is a severe restriction. At present there is no satisfactory, fully quantum-mechanical theory for adiabatic electrochemical electron-transfer reactions. 

Our study has been restricted to molecules containing only first-row atoms and with wavefunctions dominated by one determinant. Molecules such as 03 are less accurately described, with an error of about 10 kJ/mol at the CCSD(T) level of theory. For such multiconfigurational systems, more elaborate treatments are necessary and no programs are yet available for routine applications. As we go down the periodic table, relativistic effects become more important and the electronic structures more complicated. Therefore, for such systems it is presently not possible to calculate thermochemical data to the same accuracy as for closed-shell molecules containing first-row atoms. Nevertheless, systems with wave-functions dominated by single determinant are by far the most abundant and it is promising that the accuracy of a few kJ/mol is obtainable for them. 

Spin-restricted procedures, signified by an R prefix (e.g. RHF, RMP), constrain the a and (3 orbitals to be the same. As such, the resulting wavefunctions are eigenfunctions of the spin-squared operator (S2) that correspond to pure spin states (doublets, triplets, etc). The disadvantage of this approach is that it restricts the flexibility in the... 

Sebastian has emphasized that (17a) implies Pi <0.5 (since 0restricted form the wavefunction (11) has when the a and / -spin orbitals are constrained to be equal. It can be circumvented by removing this constraint and using different spatial orbitals for electrons with different spin, which is accomplished by making different choices for the coupling functions. 

---