Reproducibility liquid chromatography

This equation is based on experience with liquid chromatography of low molecular weight samples displaying single peaks. Its application for the GPC of polymers, however, contains a disadvantage, as it mixes two inseparable properties the retention difference for the separation and the peak width for the contrary effect of band broadening. Such a procedure is acceptable if both effects are accessible for an experimental examination. For the GPC experiment, we do not possess polymer standards, consisting of molecules that are truly monodisperse. Therefore, we cannot determine the real peak width necessary for a reliable and reproducible peak resolution R,. This equation then is not qualified for a sufficient characterization of a GPC column. 

Figure 7.5 The Enhanced Fluidity Liquid Chromatography range. This occupies the volume in the phase diagram below the locus of critical temperatures, above and below the locus of critical pressures, and is composed mostly of the less volatile mobile-phase component. Reproduced by permission of the American Chemical Society.

Figure 5.27 Selective detection of lactolated peptides from a tryptic digest of / -lacto-globulins by LC-electrospray-MS-MS, showing (a) the total-ion-cnrrent trace in full-scan mode, and (b) the total-ion-current trace in neutral-loss-scanning mode. Figure from Selective detection of lactolated peptides in hydrolysates by liquid chromatography/ electrospray tandem mass spectrometry , by Molle, D., Morgan, F., BouhaUab, S. and Leonil, J., in Analytical Biochemistry, Volume 259, 152-161, Copyright 1998, Elsevier Science (USA), reproduced with permission from the publisher.

Successful use of modern liquid chromatography in the clinical laboratory requires an appreciation of the method s analytical characteristics. The quantitative reproducibility with respect to peak height or peak area is quite good. With a sample loop injector relative standard deviations better than 1% are to be expected. The variability of syringe injection (3-4% relative standard deviation) requires the use of an internal standard to reach the 1% level (2,27). 

Figure 4.29 An example of the use of ternary solvents to control mobile phase strength and selectivity in reversed-phase liquid chromatography. A, methanol-water (50 50) B, tetrahydrofuran-water (32 68) C, methanol-tetrahydrofuran-water (35 10 55). Peak identification 1 - benzyl alcohol 2 phenol 3 3-phenylpropanol 4 2,4-dimethylphenol 5 benzene and 6 -diethylphthalate. (Reproduced with permission from ref. 522. Copyright Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co.)...

Figure 1 Electrochemical detection of catechol, acetaminophen, and 4-methyl catechol, demonstrating the selectivity of differential pulse detection vs. constant potential detection. (A) Catechol, (B) acetaminophen, and (C) 4-methylcatechol were separated by reversed phase liquid chromatography and detected by amperometry on a carbon fiber electrode. In the upper trace, a constant potential of +0.6 V was used. In the lower trace, a base potential of +425 mV and a pulse amplitude of +50 mV were used. An Ag/AgCl reference electrode was employed. Note that acetaminophen responds much more strongly than catechol or 4-methylcatechol under the differential pulse conditions, allowing highly selective detection. (Reproduced with permission from St. Claire, III, R. L. and Jorgenson, J. W., J. Chromatogr. Sci. 23, 186, 1985. Preston Publications, A Division of Preston Industries, Inc.)...

Figure 4.7 Applications of liquid chromatography. After Saunders [367]. Reproduced by permission of International Thomson...

FIGURE 17.25 LCCC separation of a poly(l,6-hexanediol adipate) (a) and SEC analysis of the functionality fractions (b) from Kriiger et al., 1994 (Copyright 1994 from Journal of Liquid Chromatography, 1994, p. 17 by Kruger et al. Reproduced by permission of Taylor Francis Group, LLC., http //www.taylorandfrancis.com). 

Sternson et al. [58] used a high performance liquid chromatographic method for the analysis of miconazole in plasma. Miconazole was extracted from alkalinized plasma with n-heptane-isamyl alcohol (98.5 1.5) and separated by high performance performance liquid chromatography on p-Bondapak Ci8 with ultraviolet detection at 254 nm. The mobile phase was methanol-tetrahydrofuran-acetate buffer (pH 5) (62.5 5 32.5) containing 5 mmol octanesulfonate per liter. The flow rate was 2 mL/min. Recovery was 100%. The relative standard deviation for injection-to-injection reproducibility was 0.4% and that for sample-to-sample variation was 5% at high miconazole concentrations (30 pg/mL) and 1% at low (1 pg/mL) concentrations. The limit of detection was 250 ng/mL. 

For confirmatory assay, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is becoming more frequently used in the analysis of OTC owing to its high sensitivity and ability. Electrospray ionization (ESI) [55-57] and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) [41] methods combined with tandem mass spectrometry are favored because of their higher sensitivity and better reproducibility. Hamscher et al. [58] developed a method for the determination of persistent TC residues in soil fertilized with manure by HPLC tandem mass spectrometry, MS-MS, and confirmation by MS-MS-MS. Zhu et al. [59] developed an LC-tandem mass spectrometry for the analysis of common tetracyclines in water. The detection limit for oxytetracycline was 0.21 pg/L. Lykkeberg et al. [60] used LC-MS/MS for determination of oxytetracycline and its impurities EOTC, TC, ETC, ADOTC, oc-AOTC, and /i-AOTC. 

Fig. 3. Diagrams of electrochemical cells used in flow systems for thin film deposition by EC-ALE. A) First small thin layer flow cell (modeled after electrochemical liquid chromatography detectors). A gasket defined the area where the deposition was performed, and solutions were pumped in and out though the top plate. Reproduced by permission from ref. [ 110]. B) H-cell design where the samples were suspended in the solutions, and solutions were filled and drained from below. Reproduced by permission from ref. [111]. C) Larger thin layer flow cell. This is very similar to that shown in 3A, except that the deposition area is larger and laminar flow is easier to develop because of the solution inlet and outlet designs. In addition, the opposite wall of the cell is a piece of ITO, used as the auxiliary electrode. It is transparent so the deposit can be monitored visually, and it provides an excellent current distribution. The reference electrode is incorporated right in the cell, as well. Adapted from ref. [113],...

Buchberger et al. [104] carried out a selective determination of iodide in brine. The performance of a potentiometric method using an ion-selective electrode and of liquid chromatography coupled with ultraviolet detection at 230 nm were compared as methods for the determination of iodide in the presence of other iodide species. Satisfactory results were obtained from the potentiometric method provided the solution was first diluted tenfold with 5 M sodium nitrate, and external standards were used. Better reproducibility was, however, achieved with HPLC, provided precautions were taken to prevent reduction of iodine to iodide in the mobile phase, for which extraction of iodine with carbon tetrachloride prior to analysis was recommended. This was the pre-... 

Figures 4.31(c), 4.36 and 13.3 from Snyder and Kirkland, Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography, 2nd edn., (1979) 9.41(a), (b) and (c) from Cooper, Spectroscopic Techniques for Organic Chemists (1980) 9.46 from Millard, Quantitative Mass Spectrometry (1978) 4.17, 4.18, 4.31 (a), 4.33, 4.34(a), 4.37, 4.38, 4.43 and 4.45 from Smith, Gas and Liquid Chromatography in Analytical Chemistry (1988) figures 4.42 and 13.2 from Berridge, Techniques for the Automated Optimisation of Hplc Separations (1985) reproduced by permission of John Wiley and Sons Limited 11.1, 11.5, 11.6, 11.12, 11.13, 11.14, 11.18 and 11.19 from Wendlandt, Thermal Analysis, 3rd edn., (1986) reprinted by permission of John Wiley and Sons Inc., all rights reserved.

Based on a new technology, particle beam enhanced liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry expands a chemist s ability to analyse a vast variety of substances. Electron impact spectra from the system are reproducible and can be searched against standard or custom libraries for positive compound identification. Chemical ionization spectra can also be produced. Simplicity is a key feature. A simple adjustment to the particle beam interface is all it takes. 

This technique is complementary to the thermospray technique. Relative advances of the particles beam technique over thermospray include library searchable electron impact spectra, improved reproducibility, easier use and increased predictability over a broad range of compounds. But since a particle beam requires same sample volatility, very large and polar compounds such as proteins may not provide satisfactory results using particle beam liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Additionally, certain classes of compounds such as preformed ions, azo dyes and complex sugars may not yield satisfactory electron impact spectra, but can be run on thermospray. In other words, both liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry techniques complement each other s limitations and the analyst may want to add both to address a broader range of samples. 

---