Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Reorientation smectic

Obviously, the model is crude and does not take into account many of the factors operating in a real molecular stack. Lack of symmetry with respect to the polar axis and the fact that dipoles may not necessarily be situated in one plane represent additional complications. The angle a could also be field dependent which is ignored in the model. The model also requires that interactions between molecules in adjacent stacks be very weak in order for fields of 10 to 20KV/cm to overcome barriers for field induced reorientation. The cores are then presumably composed of a more or less ordered assembly of stacks with a structure similar to smectic liquid crystals. [Pg.151]

Since P must remain normal to z and n, the polarization vector forms a helix, where P is everywhere normal to the helix axis. While locally a macroscopic dipole is present, globally this polarization averages to zero due to the presence of the SmC helix. Such a structure is sometimes termed a helical antiferroelectric. But, even with a helix of infinite pitch (i.e., no helix), which can happen in the SmC phase, bulk samples of SmC material still are not ferroelectric. A ferroelectric material must possess at least two degenerate states, or orientations of the polarization, which exist in distinct free-energy wells, and which can be interconverted by application of an electric field. In the case of a bulk SmC material with infinite pitch, all orientations of the director on the tilt cone are degenerate. In this case the polarization would simply line up parallel to an applied field oriented along any axis in the smectic layer plane, with no wells or barriers (and no hysteresis) associated with the reorientation of the polarization. While interesting, such behavior is not that of a true ferroelectric. [Pg.468]

Using this method, the M6R8/PM6R8 blend showed precisely the behavior expected for the achiral SmAPA structure. Specifically, the optical properties of the films were consistent with a biaxial smectic structure (i.e., two different refractive indices in the layer plane). The thickness of the films was quantized in units of one bilayer. Upon application of an electric field, it was seen that films with an even number of bilayers behaved in a nonpolar way, while films with an odd number of bilayers responded strongly to the field, showing that they must possess net spontaneous polarization. Note that the electric fields in this experiment are not strong enough to switch an antiferroelectric to a ferroelectric state. Reorientation of the polarization field (and director structure) of the polar film in the presence of a field can easily be seen, however. [Pg.482]

The non-collective motions include the rotational and translational self-diffusion of molecules as in normal liquids. Molecular reorientations under the influence of a potential of mean torque set up by the neighbours have been described by the small step rotational diffusion model.118 124 The roto-translational diffusion of molecules in uniaxial smectic phases has also been theoretically treated.125,126 This theory has only been tested by a spin relaxation study of a solute in a smectic phase.127 Translational self-diffusion (TD)29 is an intermolecular relaxation mechanism, and is important when proton is used to probe spin relaxation in LC. TD also enters indirectly in the treatment of spin relaxation by DF. Theories for TD in isotropic liquids and cubic solids128 130 have been extended to LC in the nematic (N),131 smectic A (SmA),132 and smectic B (SmB)133 phases. In addition to the overall motion of the molecule, internal bond rotations within the flexible chain(s) of a meso-genic molecule can also cause spin relaxation. The conformational transitions in the side chain are usually much faster than the rotational diffusive motion of the molecular core. [Pg.100]

A detailed comparative study of dielectric behaviour of smectic and nematic polymers was carried out for polymers of acrylic and methacrylic series, containing identical cyanbiphenyl groups (polymers XI and XII) 137 138>. The difference in structural organization of these polymers consists in a more perfect layer packing of smectic polymer XI (see Chaps. 4.1 and 4.2) with antiparallel orientation of CN-dipoles. This shifts the relaxation process of CN-dipole reorientation to a low frequency region compared to nematic polymer XII. Identification of Arrhenius plots for dielectric relaxation frequencies fR shows that for a smectic polymer the value of fR is a couple of orders lower than for a nematic polymer (Fig. 21). Though the values... [Pg.214]

From now on, the permeation in (16) is neglected as it is several orders of magnitude smaller than the advection due to the radial component of the velocity vr (now playing the role of vz in the planar case). As far as the velocity perturbation is concerned, our aim is to describe its principal effect-the radial motion of smectic layers, i.e., instead of diffusion (permeation) we now have advective transport. In this spirit we make several simplifications to keep the model tractable. The backflow-flow generation due to director reorientation-is neglected, as well as the effect of anisotropic viscosity (third and fourth line of (19)). Thereby (19) is reduced to the Navier-Stokes equation for the velocity perturbation, which upon linearization takes the form... [Pg.134]

Finally, the possibility of pure optical switching has been demonstrated in principle by photoinducing supramolecular helical arrangements of smectic domains in some liquid crystal azo polymer films." The photoinduced chirality is pronounced and stable (our oldest sample is still fairly young), but the process is again slow, because it requires reorientation of whole domains. [Pg.423]

In the smectic A phase the rod-like molecules are arranged in layers so that their long axes are on average perpendicular to the layer planes, see Fig. 4. The molecules are undergoing rapid reorientational motion about their long and... [Pg.89]

Kundler I, Finkelmann H. 1998. Director reorientation via stripe domains in nematic elastomers influence of cross link density, anisotropy of the network and smectic clusters. Macromol Chem Phys 199 677 686. [Pg.140]

Smectic elastomers, due to their layered structure, exhibit distinct anisotropic mechanical properties and mechanical deformation processes that are parallel or perpendicular to the normal orientation of the smectic layer. Such elastomers are important due to their optical and ferroelectric properties. Networks with a macroscopic uniformly ordered direction and a conical distribution of the smectic layer normal with respect to the normal smetic direction are mechanically deformed by uniaxial and shear deformations. Under uniaxial deformations two processes were observed [53] parallel to the direction of the mechanical field directly couples to the smectic tilt angle and perpendicular to the director while a reorientation process takes place. This process is reversible for shear deformation perpendicular and irreversible by applying the shear force parallel to the smetic direction. This is illustrated in Fig. 2.14. [Pg.44]


See other pages where Reorientation smectic is mentioned: [Pg.2023]    [Pg.2023]    [Pg.2564]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.557]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.491]    [Pg.416]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.484]    [Pg.487]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.2564]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.416]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.527]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.557]    [Pg.763]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.562]    [Pg.572]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.2 , Pg.481 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.2 , Pg.481 ]




SEARCH



Reorientation

Reorientational

© 2024 chempedia.info