Renormalized versions

Thus, the direct renormalization version produces the same results as does the cut-off version. All the divergent and finite components, which explicitly reduce in the cut-off version, simply do not emerge in the direct renormalization method. These operations arc performed automatically during the analytical passing from d<2to2[Pg.722]

All the terms with cancel, and a result is obtained, fitting closely the direct renormalization version. 

Although calculations of entire molecular PESs involving single bond breaking require using CR-CCSD[T] and CR-CCSD(T) methods rather than their simplified renormalized versions [11-13,30,31,33,35,37], these R-CCSD[T] and R-CCSD(T) approaches allow us to understand the relationship between the standard and completely renormalized CC approaches. 

Further improvements in the CR-CCSD(TQ),b results for N2 can be obtained by applying the completely renormalized versions of the CCSDT(Qf) approach (see Refs. [11,30] for the description of these methods). For example, variant b of the CR-CCSDT(Q) method [11,30], in which the completely renormalized corrections due to T4 clusters are added to the full CCSDT energies, provides a curve for N2 which is characterized by errors relative to full Cl that do not exceed 7.6 millihartree in the entire R = 0.75 — 2.25i e region and that are as small as 0.719 millihartree at R = Re and 1.161 millihartree a.t R = 2Re [12,34] (cf. Table 2). The question is if we can obtain similar or better improvements by adding noniterative corrections to the CCSD (rather than CCSDT) energies. 

Another version of SLP was proposed more recently.103 Instead of using renormalization, as alluded to above, the new scheme updates the prespecified vectors. Specifically, these vectors are modified at each Lanczos step ... 

A convolution of these values with the cochlear spreading function follows. Due to the non-normalized nature of the spreading function, the convolved versions of eb and cb should be renormalized. The convolved unpredictability, ch, is mapped to the tonality index, tb, using a log transform just as the unpredictability was mapped to the tonality index, c(t, CO), from equation (2.12). 

The difficulty with low Z values can be avoided in another version of the noncovariant renormalization method, developed in [18,19]. Within this approach an explicit expression for the matrix element ( 7o- bou( a) ) is used ... 

This PWE was used in [18] to obtain the numerical results. For the numerical implementation the B-spline approximation [21] was chosen that represents actually the refined version of the space discretization approach. In Table 1 the convergence of the PWE approach with the multicommutator expansion is presented for the lowest-order SE correction for the ground state of hydrogenlike ions with Z = 10. The minimal set of parameters for the numerical spline calcuations was chosen to be the number of grid points N = 20, the number of splines k = 9. This minimal set allowed to keep a controlled inaccuracy below 10%. What is most important for the further generalization of the PWE approach to the second-order SESE calculation is that with Zmax = 3 the inaccuracy is already below 10% (see Table 1). The same picture holds with even higher accuracy for larger Z values. The direct renormalization approach is not necessarily connected with the PWE. In [19] this approach in the form of the multicommutator expansion (Eq. (16)) was employed in combination with the Taylor expansion in powers of (Ea — En>)r 12 The numerical procedure with the use of B-splines and 3 terms of Taylor series yielded an accuracy comparable with the PWE-expansion with Zmax = 3. 

The work [26] was devoted to the application of the PWE renormalization approach to the evaluation of the SESE a) irreducible contribution. In this work the multicommutator expansion version of the PWE [18] and the numerical B-spline approach was used. The results disagree strongly with Mallampalli and Sapirstein calculations for low and intermediate Z values but agree with [23,24,25],... 

The MSA is a systematic generalization of the DH theory (strictly speaking in its linearized version). The factor of 1 in the DH/PB approach becomes go(R), the exponential becomes f(R) and (l + fco)-1 becomes (1+To)-2. The factor (1 + Yo) 2 overcomes the asymmetry that is a problem in the DH theory. In the MSA, both ions in the pair are treated at the same consistent level. The appearance of go(R) leads to oscillations (the function f(R) also oscillates but this is secondary). The renormalized screening parameter, T, is smaller than k so that the system does not become overscreened. In the DH theory, 1/fccan be less than o. This is an unphysical situation because it would mean the screening atmosphere of counterions was placed inside the central ion. 

These transport equations contain four empirical parameters, which are listed in Table 3.1 along with the parameter appearing in Eq. (3.20). The values of these parameters are obtained with the help of experimental information about simple flows such as decay of turbulence behind the grid (Launder and Spalding, 1972). Before discussing the modifications to the standard k-s model and its recent renormalization group version, it will be useful to summarize implicit and explicit assumptions underlying the k- model ... 

The finite temperature studies of Lennard-Jones lattice gas systems have been performed for the square [105,116], rectangular [106] and triangular [100,111,112] lattices using different approaches, including the simple mean-field theory, the renormalization group method, Monte Carlo simulation and Monte Carlo version of the coherent anomaly method. 

Xs, promised, the 77-map (4) has the same algebraic form as the original map (3) We can renormalize (4) into (3) by rescaling q and by defining a new p. (Note The need for both of these steps was anticipated in the abstract version of renormalization discussed earlier. We have to rescale the state variable q and shift the bifurcation parameter p.)... 

Renormalization approach to intermittency functional version) Show that if the renormalization procedure in Exercise 10.7.8 is done exactly, we are led to the functional equation... 

Gell-Mann and Low [23] derived a formula which yields the energy shift due to the interaction (149) in terms of the matrix elements of the operator 5. (0, —00) where S. is the electron operator (108) obtained from I5q(109) with replaced by operator (149). Later Sucher [24] derived a symmetrized version of the energy shift formula, containing the matrix elements of the operator 5y(oo, —00) and which is more suitable for the renormalization procedure. 

In order to prepare the discussion of the relativistic generalization of the HK-theorem in Section 3 we finally consider the renormalization procedure for inhomogeneous systems. As the underlying renormalization program of vacuum QED is formulated within a perturbative framework (see Appendix B) we assume the perturbing potential to be sufficiently weak to allow a power series expansion of all relevant quantities with respect to V. In particular, this allows an explicit derivation of the counterterms required for the field theoretical version of the KS equations, i.e. for the four current and kinetic energy of noninteracting particles. 

---