Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Relative transition intensities

The relative transition intensities of the spectrum are a good measure of the local temperature of the molecule. This raises the interesting question of whether the relative intensities of R- and P-branch transitions have the same rotational temperature and whether molecules in the same parts of space tell the same temperature. [Pg.67]

Again this result agrees with that given by Yamada, Endo and Hirota [138] final results for the relative transition intensities require prior diagonalisation of the effective Hamiltonian matrix. [Pg.775]

Plot of the relative transition intensities of the rotational lines in a diatomic molecule s vibrational absorption band. The curves are plots of the quantity (2/ + )- /(/+ ) but with / treated as a continuous variable. The numerical values of x are shown next to each curve. Notice that as the temperature increases, x becomes smaller. [Pg.271]

As can be seen from the relative transition intensities in Fig. 3.3.3, the fundamental Ad = it 1 is far more intense than the overtones, indicating that the vibration of the molecule is close to harmonic. [Pg.72]

Figure 6-3. A plot of the relative population of a rotational state J to the J 0 state H CI at different temperatures. The rotational constant, Bq, for H C1 is 10,59 cm" (see Table 6-2). The curves are a plot of Equation 6-35 with J treated as a continuous variable. The relative transition intensities in an infrared spectrum of a diatomic molecule can be related to the relative populations of the rotational states. Figure 6-3. A plot of the relative population of a rotational state J to the J 0 state H CI at different temperatures. The rotational constant, Bq, for H C1 is 10,59 cm" (see Table 6-2). The curves are a plot of Equation 6-35 with J treated as a continuous variable. The relative transition intensities in an infrared spectrum of a diatomic molecule can be related to the relative populations of the rotational states.
Another related issue is the computation of the intensities of the peaks in the spectrum. Peak intensities depend on the probability that a particular wavelength photon will be absorbed or Raman-scattered. These probabilities can be computed from the wave function by computing the transition dipole moments. This gives relative peak intensities since the calculation does not include the density of the substance. Some types of transitions turn out to have a zero probability due to the molecules symmetry or the spin of the electrons. This is where spectroscopic selection rules come from. Ah initio methods are the preferred way of computing intensities. Although intensities can be computed using semiempirical methods, they tend to give rather poor accuracy results for many chemical systems. [Pg.95]

When comparing relative intensity data obtained in a single frequency band, we are not interested in the magnitude of the prefactor, therefore, we define a relative transition probability... [Pg.142]

Fig. 6.3.8. Relative peak intensities of linear and branched SPC homologues determined by LC-ESI-MS/MS recording the ion transitions [M — II] —> m/z 183 for linear SPC and [M — Hm/z 197 for branched SPC. Fig. 6.3.8. Relative peak intensities of linear and branched SPC homologues determined by LC-ESI-MS/MS recording the ion transitions [M — II] —> m/z 183 for linear SPC and [M — Hm/z 197 for branched SPC.
They, in contrast to Kishi and Roberts (52) and Johnson and Roberts (55), interpret the N(ls) peak at 405 eV as a satellite of the 400-eV peak moreover Fuggle and Menzel observe two components to the 400-eV peak, one at 399.1 eV and the other at 400.4 eV. These they attribute to the two nonequivalent nitrogen atoms in a vertically adsorbed Nj molecule and draw the analogy with the splittings observed in dinitrogen complexes of transition metals. The question that is immediately raised is the interpretation of the relatively high intensity of the satellite peak, some 60% of the main peak. Fuggle et al. (56) have considered this point. [Pg.75]

The diffuse-reflectance UV-vis spectra of the powdered saaples showed as in Pig 2 the draaatic changes of the relative peak intensities at 280 nn(B-band) and 550,580 nn(Q-band) between the NaY intrazeolite and external FePc(t-Bu)4, where the Q-hand(7T-7r transition of Pc ring) is Markedly suppressed in the FePc(t-Bu>4 inside NaY, whereas those of B-band for peripheral benzene ring... [Pg.338]

The band at 19 kK of relatively low intensity is assigned to the symmetry-forbidden transition - 3A2. Also the two transitions to the A2 and B2 levels are s5nnmetry-forbidden and accordingly appear as shoulders of low intensity. [Pg.77]

Transition metal (TM) systems present a fundamental dilemma for computational chemists. On the one hand, TM centers are often associated with relatively complicated electronic structures which appear to demand some form of quantum mechanical (QM) approach (1). On the other hand, all forms of QM are relatively compute intensive and are impractical for conformational searching, virtual high-throughput screening, or dynamics simulations... [Pg.1]

From the data of Hoogschagen and Gorter (104), the oscillator strength of the 5D4-+7F6 transition was obtained. By means of the Ladenburg formula, the spontaneous coefficient A46 was calculated. Using the relative-emission intensities, the rest of the A4J spontaneous-emission coefficients could be calculated. From these and a measured lifetime of 5.5 x 10 4 sec at 15°C, he calculated a quantum efficiency of 0.8 per cent. Kondrat eva concluded that the probability of radiationless transition for the trivalent terbium ion in aqueous solution is approximately two orders of magnitude greater than for the radiation transition. [Pg.248]

Decay Time (t) and Relative Fluorescence Intensity (0) of 5Dq 1F2 Transitions at 6100 to 6200 A for EuD3 and its Solid Complexes with Lewis Bases... [Pg.274]

K f. U, + Ix2 tj) 2. (It might be thought necessary to consider also the effect of the relative populations of the levels on the transition intensities, but the separation between nuclear-spin energy levels is much less than kT, so that the very slight differences in population can be ignored here.)... [Pg.426]


See other pages where Relative transition intensities is mentioned: [Pg.216]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.716]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.716]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.1324]    [Pg.1456]    [Pg.1570]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.450]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.539]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.249]   


SEARCH



Intensity relative

Transition intensities

© 2024 chempedia.info