Rejection compounds from water

Microliltration (MF) and ultraliltration (UF) membranes are used to remove line colloidal particles (MF and UF), large bacteria (MF and UF), viruses (UF) and large molecules (UF) such as proteins. Nanofiltration (NF) membranes typically reject molecules with a molecular weight higher than 200 Dalton. RO membranes are able to remove nearly all dissolved compounds from water (see Fig. 7.13). 

The removal of PhCs by NF membranes occurs via a combination of three mechanisms adsorption, sieving and electrostatic repulsion. Removal efficiency can vary widely from compound to compound, as it is strictly correlated to (a) the physicochemical properties of the micro-pollutant in question, (b) the properties of the membrane itself (permeability, pore size, hydrophobicity and surface charge) and (c) the operating conditions, such as flux, transmembrane pressure, rejections/recovery and water feed quality. 

A reaction between organic compounds is carried out in the liquid phase in a stirred-tank reactor in the presence of excess formaldehyde. The organic reactants are nonvolatile in comparison with the formaldehyde. The reactor is vented to atmosphere via an absorber to scrub any organic material carried from the reactor. The absorber is fed with freshwater and the water from the absorber rejected to effluent. The major contaminant in the aqueous waste from the absorber is formaldehyde. 

The primary evidence for the conversion of gaseous monolayers at the air-water interface to other intermediate states lies in the abrupt changes found on the n-A isotherms of many film-forming compounds. So many of these isotherms have been reproduced in fine detail in a number of laboratories under a variety of conditions that they cannot possibly be rejected wholesale as artifacts. The sharp transitions from curves to plateaus, where the molecular area varies readily at constant surface pressure, may be related... 

What are the membranes inherent rejections of different classes of organic compounds that may be found in water at trace levels Can measurable improvements in the rejection of organics be expected from newer membrane materials ... 

Membrane Concentration Test. Process potential was demonstrated by concentrating 500 L of synthetic tap water spiked with trace levels of the model compounds. A 50X volumetric concentration was achieved by reducing the sample volume from 500 to 10 L. The recovery of model compounds and membrane rejection of compounds were evaluated, and the location of system losses was approximated. 

The overwhelming conclusion supported by data is the superiority of the FT-30 composite membrane for the majority of organic compounds tested. From arguments presented earlier, improved recovery of organic compounds on the basis of these higher rejection properties would be expected. Data from selected literature sources (6, 10-20) on membrane rejections of organics in water at parts-per-million levels were reviewed. Results are presented by chemical class in Table VI. Data are compiled for cellulose acetate and a cross-linked NS-1-type composite membrane. Differences in the rejection of various compound classes by the two membrane types determined at higher solute levels are similar to those observed and reported here at parts-per-billion levels. 

---