Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Reference score

Relative Risk The goal is to rank departments, not individual hazards. The department with the highest risk index (highest positive value) is not likely to need much reduction in hazards. A high risk index value indicates that controls in place are effective. A department with a high risk index will not need funds as much as other departments. The authors use the best department risk score as the baseline or reference score for all other departments. The procedure adjusts aU department scores relative to the score for the best department. The procedure subtracts the risk score for the best department from all other department risk scores. This adjustment makes the relative risk score for the best department zero. [Pg.500]

One limitation of clique detection is that it needs to be run repeatedly with differei reference conformations and the run-time scales with the number of conformations pt molecule. The maximum likelihood method [Bamum et al. 1996] eliminates the need for reference conformation, effectively enabling every conformation of every molecule to a< as the reference. Despite this, the algorithm scales linearly with the number of conformatior per molecule, so enabling a larger number of conformations (up to a few hundred) to b handled. In addition, the method scores each of the possible pharmacophores based upo the extent to which it fits the set of input molecules and an estimate of its rarity. It is nc required that every molecule has to be able to match every feature for the pharmacophor to be considered. [Pg.673]

Protocols allow for at least two vessels to test both the untreated control malodor and the treated malodor(s). The untreated control malodor is used as a reference point for the maximum malodor score. When panehsts evaluate each of the two or more vessels, they must wait a period of time (usually 30—60 s) for recovery from adaptation before smelling the next vessel. This step is always repeated between each evaluation. [Pg.293]

FIGURE 5.2 Clinical outcome of patients in the double-blind, proof-of-concept trial evaluating EPO in acute stroke, (a) Barthel Index (rhEPO vs. placebo, p < 0.05). (b) Modified Rankin Scale (rhEPO vs. placebo, p < 0.07) on day 30. Dead patients received the worst possible score. Evolution of lesion size of patients in the efficacy trial of Albumin in acute stroke, ((a-1) and DWI and (a-2) FLAIR.) (Reprinted with permission from reference 50.)... [Pg.103]

FIGURE 5.3 Continued) (b) Distribution of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 3 months in the lower (I-III) and higher (IV-VI) albumin dose tiers for the rt-PA and non-rt-PA cohorts. (Reprinted with permission from reference 57.)... [Pg.106]

Figure 5.2 Environmental scores of reduction steps in routes B and C (Scheme 5.1) according to the Eco-lndicator95 evaluation method (Figure 2 in reference [11 ]). Ml = catalyst, M2 = reduction, M3 = catalyst removal, M4 = extraction, M5 = solvent drain off, M5 = rectification, M7 = enantiomeric purification, M8 = solvent recycling. Reproduced from Jodicke [11 ], Copyright 1 999, with permission from Elsevier. Figure 5.2 Environmental scores of reduction steps in routes B and C (Scheme 5.1) according to the Eco-lndicator95 evaluation method (Figure 2 in reference [11 ]). Ml = catalyst, M2 = reduction, M3 = catalyst removal, M4 = extraction, M5 = solvent drain off, M5 = rectification, M7 = enantiomeric purification, M8 = solvent recycling. Reproduced from Jodicke [11 ], Copyright 1 999, with permission from Elsevier.
The HINT method [49-51] refers to the idea of Abraham and Leo [52] that hydro-phobic fragment constants, reduced to atomic values, could be used to evaluate interactions between small and large molecules. The interaction energy term by scores atom-atom interactions ij) within or between the molecules using the following equation ... [Pg.391]

Fig. 31.2. Geometrical example of the duality of data space and the concept of a common factor space, (a) Representation of n rows (circles) of a data table X in a space Sf spanned by p columns. The pattern P" is shown in the form of an equiprobabi lity ellipse. The latent vectors V define the orientations of the principal axes of inertia of the row-pattern, (b) Representation of p columns (squares) of a data table X in a space y spanned by n rows. The pattern / is shown in the form of an equiprobability ellipse. The latent vectors U define the orientations of the principal axes of inertia of the column-pattern, (c) Result of rotation of the original column-space S toward the factor-space S spanned by r latent vectors. The original data table X is transformed into the score matrix S and the geometric representation is called a score plot, (d) Result of rotation of the original row-space S toward the factor-space S spanned by r latent vectors. The original data table X is transformed into the loading table L and the geometric representation is referred to as a loading plot, (e) Superposition of the score and loading plot into a biplot. Fig. 31.2. Geometrical example of the duality of data space and the concept of a common factor space, (a) Representation of n rows (circles) of a data table X in a space Sf spanned by p columns. The pattern P" is shown in the form of an equiprobabi lity ellipse. The latent vectors V define the orientations of the principal axes of inertia of the row-pattern, (b) Representation of p columns (squares) of a data table X in a space y spanned by n rows. The pattern / is shown in the form of an equiprobability ellipse. The latent vectors U define the orientations of the principal axes of inertia of the column-pattern, (c) Result of rotation of the original column-space S toward the factor-space S spanned by r latent vectors. The original data table X is transformed into the score matrix S and the geometric representation is called a score plot, (d) Result of rotation of the original row-space S toward the factor-space S spanned by r latent vectors. The original data table X is transformed into the loading table L and the geometric representation is referred to as a loading plot, (e) Superposition of the score and loading plot into a biplot.
Analysis of RMs enables assessment of laboratory factors (equipment, staff etc.) on quality, but it is the awareness of the importance of reference materials within the quality culture of the laboratory (recognizing crucial steps in method vahdation, ambitions to have good IQC and ambitions to have better performance scores in EQA) - that they are used to greatest effect. [Pg.121]

Calculate clinical pulmonary infection score (refer to Table 9.4)... [Pg.126]

If we consider only a few of the general requirements for the ideal polymer/additive analysis techniques (e.g. no matrix interferences, quantitative), then it is obvious that the choice is much restricted. Elements of the ideal method might include LD and MS, with reference to CRMs. Laser desorption and REMPI-MS are moving closest to direct selective sampling tandem mass spectrometry is supreme in identification. Direct-probe MS may yield accurate masses and concentrations of the components contained in the polymeric material. Selective sample preparation, efficient separation, selective detection, mass spectrometry and chemometric deconvolution techniques are complementary rather than competitive techniques. For elemental analysis, LA-ICP-ToFMS scores high. [Pg.744]

Because the eigenvectors are ordered according to the maximum variability, a subset of the first k < N scores define the most variability possible in a /c-dimensional subspace. This subspace is referred to as the score space. [Pg.25]

Tea , in this work, refers only to the plant Camellia sinensis, its leaves, and the extracts and infusions thereof. Leaf, bark, stem, root, or flower extracts of scores of other plants are also sold as teas , creating confusion. An important reason for the consumption of these other teas , a.k.a. herbal teas or tisanes , is their lack of methylxanthines, unlike beverages prepared from Camellia sinensis which are naturally rich in these substances, especially caffeine. [Pg.46]

The most straightforward full-spectrum comparison approach uses a correlation or cross-correlation coefficient to construct a score. Given a reference signature spectrum y, and an unknown sample spectrum xh for channels i = 1, 2,..., the linear cross-correlation can be expressed as... [Pg.155]


See other pages where Reference score is mentioned: [Pg.52]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.495]    [Pg.498]    [Pg.546]    [Pg.673]    [Pg.683]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.422]    [Pg.985]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.435]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.637]    [Pg.793]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.156]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.196 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info