Reduced space analyses factorization

A first introduction to principal components analysis (PCA) has been given in Chapter 17. Here, we present the method from a more general point of view, which encompasses several variants of PCA. Basically, all these variants have in common that they produce linear combinations of the original columns in a measurement table. These linear combinations represent a kind of abstract measurements or factors that are better descriptors for structure or pattern in the data than the original measurements [1]. The former are also referred to as latent variables [2], while the latter are called manifest variables. Often one finds that a few of these abstract measurements account for a large proportion of the variation in the data. In that case one can study structure and pattern in a reduced space which is possibly two- or three-dimensional. 

Cummins et al. [30] have developed a method for comparing databases that involves characterizing the molecules using topological indices and reducing the dimensionality of the descriptor space by factor analysis. Sixty topological de-... 

Factor spaces are a mystery no more We now understand that eigenvectors simply provide us with an optimal way to reduce the dimensionality of our spectra without degrading them. We ve seen that, in the process, our data are unchanged except for the beneficial removal of some noise. Now, we are ready to use this technique on our realistic simulated data. PCA will serve as a pre-processing step prior to ILS. The combination of Principal Component Analysis with ILS is called Principal Component Regression, or PCR. 

This would reduce the cost of inventory space, management, and insurance (it would also result in customers receiving fresher products where this is a factor). Furthermore, in applications where certificates of analysis are required prior to shipping or acceptance, time saved may translate into material holding and/or labor savings (e. g., for truck driver s or tanker crew s idle time awaiting authorization to depart). 

A sample may be characterized by the determination of a number of different analytes. For example, a hydrocarbon mixture can be analysed by use of a series of UV absorption peaks. Alternatively, in a sediment sample a range of trace metals may be determined. Collectively, these data represent patterns characteristic of the samples, and similar samples will have similar patterns. Results may be compared by vectorial presentation of the variables, when the variables for similar samples will form clusters. Hence the term cluster analysis. Where only two variables are studied, clusters are readily recognized in a two-dimensional graphical presentation. For more complex systems with more variables, i.e. //, the clusters will be in -dimensional space. Principal component analysis (PCA) explores the interdependence of pairs of variables in order to reduce the number to certain principal components. A practical example could be drawn from the sediment analysis mentioned above. Trace metals are often attached to sediment particles by sorption on to the hydrous oxides of Al, Fe and Mn that are present. The Al content could be a principal component to which the other metal contents are related. Factor analysis is a more sophisticated form of principal component analysis. 

We have recognised in the preceding Chapter 5.1 Factor Analysis, that this path is concentrated in a much lower dimensional sub-space. Usually, for an nc component system, the sub-space has nc dimensions e.g. for a two component system, all spectra lie in a plane. Recall that, if the system is closed, the dimension of the sub-space can be further reduced by meancentring. 

How is dimension reduction of chemical spaces achieved There are a number of different concepts and mathematical procedures to reduce the dimensionality of descriptor spaces with respect to a molecular dataset under investigation. These techniques include, for example, linear mapping, multidimensional scaling, factor analysis, or principal component analysis (PCA), as reviewed in ref. 8. Essentially, these techniques either try to identify those descriptors among the initially chosen ones that are most important to capture the chemical information encoded in a molecular dataset or, alternatively, attempt to construct new variables from original descriptor contributions. A representative example will be discussed below in more detail. 

The nature of the lower vesicular zone is not particularly dependent on flow thickness beyond size compression due to lava overburden. As bubbles rise to escape the rising lower crystallization front, the size of the largest bubble caught depends on the velocity of the front, and once the velocity (slowing with the square-root of time like a cooling half space) is reduced below the Stokes velocity of the smallest bubbles in the distribution, all can escape and the lower boundary of the massive zone (Sahagian et al. 1989) is defined at that point. This is true of any flow thickness, so that the only factor that controls the nature of the lower vesicular zone (relative to that of the upper vesicular zone, which is much more complex) is the overlying pressure of the lava. A thicker flow would result in proportionally smaller size mode, which is the basis of the entire analysis for paleoelevation. 

Cynthia must also determine how much the clinic cost the HMO so that she can factor those costs into her analysis. She includes the salary and benefits of a part-time pharmacist to manage the service ( 50,000) and the laboratory tests, supplies, and space costs necessary to monitor the patients ( 72,000). Therefore, the direct cost of the clinic was 122,000 that year. The benefits of this service included decreases in the number of hospitalizations and average length of stay. Taken together, the total number of hospital days was reduced by an average of 7.2 days [(5 X 5.6) —(4 X 5.2)] for each... 

---