Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Reactive scattering amplitude

Fig. 3 H + H2(v = 0,j = 0) —> H2(v, /) + H para-para state-to-state Pauli-antisymmetiized DCS for two different total energies computed by excluding (NGP) and including the geometric phase explicitly (GPl), by artificially changing the sign of the reactive scattering amplitude, and implicitly (GP2) with the vector potential approach... Fig. 3 H + H2(v = 0,j = 0) —> H2(v, /) + H para-para state-to-state Pauli-antisymmetiized DCS for two different total energies computed by excluding (NGP) and including the geometric phase explicitly (GPl), by artificially changing the sign of the reactive scattering amplitude, and implicitly (GP2) with the vector potential approach...
By assuming that the system does not encircle the Cl, Mead showed [14] that this equation implies that the GP changes the relative sign of the inelastic and reactive contributions in the scattering amplitude. [Pg.32]

C.A. Mead, Superposition of reactive and nonreactive scattering amplitudes in the presence of a conical intersection. J. Chem. Phys., 72 3839-3840, 1980. [Pg.145]

This paper reviews this classical S-matrix theory, i.e. the semiclassical theory of inelastic and reactive scattering which combines exact classical mechanics (i.e. numerically computed trajectories) with the quantum principle of superposition. It is always possible, and in some applications may even be desirable, to apply the basic semiclassical model with approximate dynamics Cross7 has discussed the simplifications that result in classical S-matrix theory if one treats the dynamics within the sudden approximation, for example, and shown how this relates to some of his earlier work8 on inelastic scattering. For the most part, however, this review will emphasize the use of exact classical dynamics and avoid discussion of various dynamical models and approximations, the reason being to focus on the nature and validity of the basic semiclassical idea itself, i.e., classical dynamics plus quantum superposition. Actually, all quantum effects—being a direct result of the superposition of probability amplitudes—are contained (at least qualitatively) within the semiclassical model, and the primary question to be answered regards the quantitative accuracy of the description. [Pg.78]

S.H. Suck. The kernel of DW6A transition amplitude in atom-diatom reactive scattering. Int. J. Quant. Chem.. 19. 441-50 (1981). [Pg.281]

So far we have indicated how once the scattering matrix of a reactive system is known, the scattering amplitudes and cross sections can be obtained. In this section we outline how that matrix can be calculated once the system s electronically adiabatic potential energy function V Rx,rx, x) is known. [Pg.74]

The three variational principles in common use in scattering theory are due to Kohn [9], Schwinger [11] and Newton [12]. Two of these variational principles, those due to Kohn and Newton, have been successfully developed and applied to reactive scattering problems in recent years there is the S-matrix Kohn method of Zhang, Chu, and Miller, the related log derivative Kohn method of Manolopoulos, D Mello, and Wyatt and the L - Amplitude Density Generalized Newton Variational Principle (L -AD GNVP) method of Schwenke, Kouri, and Truhlar. [Pg.112]

Scattering amplitude Reactivity ratio product Radius of gyration... [Pg.5]

We expect that this scattering mapping could be fruitfully applied to the semiclassical evaluation of reactive amplitudes and probabilities. [Pg.511]

The OCT has recently been extended to cover many orbital effects in the chemical bond and reactivity phenomena [38, 68-70]. The orbital communications have also been used to study the bridge bond order components [71, 72] and the multiple probability scattering phenomena in the framework of the probability-amplitude channel [73]. The implicit bond-dependency origins of the indirect (bridge) interactions between atomic orbitals in molecules have also been investigated [74],... [Pg.45]

Sq Si absorption band, shifting of the probe wavelength affects probe transmission just as does shifting of the crystalline absorption spectrum. In Figure 15, the major contribution is that due to coherent scattering. Quantitative determination of the phonon-induced spectral shift is impossible, but an approximate upper limit can be set. Its value ( 1 cm" for a 10" -A phonon amplitude) indicates that the initial slope of the Sj potential with respect to intermolecular separation is rather gradual and that the slope must increase as displacement increases [98]. Thus, in addition to information about excimer formation dynamics, partial (and at this point, qualitative) information about the reactive potential surface has been elucidated. [Pg.32]


See other pages where Reactive scattering amplitude is mentioned: [Pg.230]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.770]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.510]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.818]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.534]    [Pg.558]    [Pg.660]    [Pg.662]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.3130]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.332]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.218 , Pg.222 , Pg.223 , Pg.230 ]




SEARCH



Reactive scattering

Scattering amplitude

© 2024 chempedia.info