Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Reaction rate standard deviation

On Figure 6.3.1 the first line tells the date and duration of the experiment. In the third line the number of cycles is five. This indicates that feed and product streams were analyzed five times before an evaluation was made. The concentrations, and all other numbers are the average of the five repeated analyses with the standard deviation given for each average value. The RATE as 1/M means for each component the reaction rate in lb-moles per 1000 lbs of catalyst. [Pg.126]

The precision of the rate constants as a function of temperature determines the standard deviations of the activation parameters. The absolute error, not the percentage error in the activation parameters, represents the agreement to the model, because of the exponential functions. If, for example, one wished to examine the values of AS for two reactions that were reported as -4 3 and 26 3 J mol 1K 1, then it should be concluded that the two are known to the same accuracy. Since AS and A// are correlated parameters, the uncertainty in AS will be about 1/Tav times that in A//. At ambient temperature this amounts to an approximate factor of three (that is, 1000/T, converting from joules for AS to kilojoules for A// ). Thus, the uncertainty in A//, 0 of 2.50 kJ mol 1 is consistent with the uncertainty in ASn of 7.21 J mol1 K-1 at Tav - 350 K. [Pg.158]

As given above, the statements that adjust the exponents m and n have been commented out and the initial values for these exponents are zero. This means that the program will fit the data to. = k. This is the form for a zero-order reaction, but the real purpose of running this case is to calculate the standard deviation of the experimental rate data. The object of the fitting procedure is to add functionality to the rate expression to reduce the standard deviation in a manner that is consistent with physical insight. Results for the zero-order fit are shown as Case 1 in the following data ... [Pg.214]

Reaction order n Rate constant Standard deviation cr... [Pg.219]

Garcia et al. [45] determined penicillamine in pharmaceutical preparations by FIA. Powdered tablets were dissolved in water, and the solution was filtered. Portions (70 pL) of the filtrate were injected into a carrier stream of water that merged with a stream of 1 mM PdCl2 in 1 M HC1 for determination of penicillamine. The mixture was passed though a reaction coil (180 cm long) and the absorbance was measured at 400 nm. Flow rates were 1.2 and 2.2 mL/min for the determination of penicillamine, the calibration graphs were linear for 0.01-0.7 mM, and the relative standard deviation (n = 10) for 0.17 mM analyte was 0.8%. The method was sufficiently selective, and there were no significant differences between the labeled contents and the obtained results. [Pg.142]

Precision FIA measurements typically show low relative standard deviations (RSD) on replicate measurements, mainly due to the definite and reproducible way of sample introduction. This is a very important feature especially for CL, which is very sensitive to several environmental factors and sensitivity relies greatly on the rate of the reaction. [Pg.344]

Phosphoric Acid. The 2nd-order rate method for analyzing the TGA data was statistically best (Table IV) for the cellulose/H PO samples. This suggests that the conclusions from a prior study which assumed a lst-order reaction (29) may need to be reexamined. While Wilkinson s approximation method gave high r values, the rate constant is determined by the intercept rather than the slope in this method. Thus, the standard deviation of the rates determined by Wilkinson s approximation method is still relatively high when compared to the other methods. In addition, the reaction order as determined by the Wilkinson approximation method was unrealistically high, ranging from 2.6 to 5.8. [Pg.357]

The error in the isotope effect is llkD[AkH)2 + (kHlkD)2 x (AkD)2]1/2, where AkH and AkD are the standard deviations for the rate constants for the reactions of the undeuterated and deuterated substrates, respectively. [Pg.195]

Second-order rate constants for MTSEA-, MTSET-, and MTSES-modification of residues within the loop D region of the GABA-binding site. Second-order rate constants (IC2) represent the mean standard deviation. NR, no reaction. The free solution rates were reported by Karlin and Akabas (1998) and reflect the rates of MTS reaction with 2-mercaptoethanol. Adapted from Holden and Czajkowski (2002) with permission from the American Society of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology... [Pg.445]

COMPOUNDING OF ERRORS. Data collected in an experiment seldom involves a single operation, a single adjustment, or a single experimental determination. For example, in studies of an enzyme-catalyzed reaction, one must separately prepare stock solutions of enzyme and substrate, one must then mix these and other components to arrive at desired assay concentrations, followed by spectrophotometric determinations of reaction rates. A Lowry determination of protein or enzyme concentration has its own error, as does the spectrophotometric determination of ATP that is based on a known molar absorptivity. All operations are subject to error, and the error for the entire set of operations performed in the course of an experiment is said to involve the compounding of errors. In some circumstances, the experimenter may want to conduct an error analysis to assess the contributions of statistical uncertainties arising in component operations to the error of the entire set of operations. Knowledge of standard deviations from component operations can also be utilized to estimate the overall experimental error. [Pg.653]

Figure 2.1.6 shows the results of such a continuous synthesis process. It shows the variation of the mean particle size during the experiment. The error bars indicate the standard deviation of the particle size distribution of each sample based on the transmission electron micrographs (number distribution). The experiment was performed under the following conditions (A) ammonia, water, and TEOS concentrations were 0.8, 8.0, and 0.2 mol dm-3 7", = 273 K, T2 = 313 K total flow rate was 2.8 cm3 min-1 100 m reaction tube of 3 mm diameter residence time 4 h and (B) ammonia, water, and TEOS concentrations were 1.5,8.0, and 0.2 mol dm- 3 Tx = 273 K, T2 = 313 K total flow rate was 8 cm3 min-1 50 m reaction tube of 6 mm diameter, residence time 3 h. Further details and other examples are described elsewhere (38). Unger et al. (50) also described a slightly modified continuous reaction setup in another publication. [Pg.134]

Reactions in 1.83M Sulfuric Acid. In a medium of 1.83M sulfuric acid the reaction of or-Cr(OH2) 2(0204)2 with cerium(IV) was found to be of apparent second order, being first order in each reactant. Second-order rate plots based on spectro-photometric measurements at 25° are shown in Figure 2. The average of 11 kinetic runs which covered the reactant concentration ranges [Ce(IV)]o = 2.00 X 10-2 to 2.50 X 10-3Af and [cis-]0 = 1.00 X 10-2 to 2.50 X 10 W gave a mean value for the apparent second-order rate constant, k (= — [Ce(IV) / /[Ge(IV)][cis-]) of 1.06 ( 0.10) X 10-1 liter mole-1 sec.-1 The value in parenthesis refers to the standard deviation from the mean. [Pg.237]

Starting with either 1-butene or 1-pentene the conversion (x) was measured as a function of time (t). Plots of log (xe — x) vs. t were linear (8) at all temperatures, demonstrating that the reactions were first order in time. From the slopes of these plots the sums (k2i + k31) were calculated, and when combined with the data plotted in Figure 1 (Z i/A x), they allowed the calculation of the absolute values of the rate constants. The values of k21 and k31 for each olefin are plotted against 1000/77 in Figure 2. The differences in activation energies (AEtj) and the absolute values of E2i and E i were calculated from the experimental points represented in Figures 1 and 2, respectively. These values and their standard deviations in kcal/mole, were obtained by a computer fit and are summarized in Table II. [Pg.553]

If m and ri2 are unity, r2/cA is plotted versus ca/cr. Then ki is obtained from the intersection of the resulting straight line and the ordinate, whereas ki is its slope. Standard mathematical methods, such as linear- and multiple regression, or search techniques based on least-squares-methods to minimize the deviation of measured and calculated reaction rates, must be applied to determine the rate constants when m and m are different from unity. [Pg.74]

Deviation from standard chemical kinetics described in (Section 2.1.1) can happen only if the reaction rate K (t) reveals its own non-monotonous time dependence. Since K(t) is a functional of the correlation functions, it means that these functions have to possess their own motion, practically independent on the time development of concentrations. The correlation functions characterize the intermediate order in the particle distribution in a spatially-homogeneous system. Change of such an intermediate order could be interpreted as a series of structural transitions. [Pg.501]


See other pages where Reaction rate standard deviation is mentioned: [Pg.228]    [Pg.856]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.478]    [Pg.450]    [Pg.531]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.945]    [Pg.946]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.464]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.195]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.118 ]




SEARCH



Reaction Rates standard

Standard Rates

Standard deviation

Standard deviation standardization

Standard reaction

© 2024 chempedia.info