Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Reaction mechanisms geometric predictions

The expectation values of all the observables mentioned above play a role in the prediction and interpretation of the properties of molecules, in a variety of elaborations and combinations depending on the formulation of the theory for the specific theme under examination (theory of the chemical bond, theory of the geometrical equilibrium structure, theories for the various spectroscopic properties, for molecular dynamics, for reactivity, for the chemical reaction mechanisms, etc.). We shall limit our attention to the theories for chemical reactivity a very important subject, but limited with respect to the variety of problems of interest in the molecular sciences shortly summarized above. This limitation of the theme also implies a limitation in the use of electrostatic quantities. The emphasis is placed here on the energy of molecular interactions and on the forces acting on the molecular interacting units. [Pg.232]

One of the best tests for DFT is probably the Diels-Alder reaction (see Figure 3) of butadiene and ethylene. It has only been recently that the controversy over whether the reaction undergoes a concerted or stepwise mechanism has led to consensus, The reaction mechanism of butadiene and ethylene is concerted, i,e, the reaction involves a transition state with two equal C-C distances of approach between the two reactants. However, the activation barrier for the stepwise mechanism is only a few kcal mol higher, Goldstein et al, have shown that the B3-LPY method is capable of direct comparison of concerted versus stepwise mechanisms. Table 18 illustrates the DFT and ab initio predictions of the geometrical parameters d, R, and Ri, as shown in Figure 3, and the activation energy for the transition state involved in... [Pg.676]

With the advent of quantum mechanics, quite early attempts were made to obtain methods to predict chemical reactivity quantitatively. This endeavor has now matured to a point where details of the geometric and energetic changes in the course of a reaction can be calculated to a high degree of accuracy, albeit still with quite some demand on computational resources. [Pg.179]

The successful mechanism for a reaction is a theory that correlates the many facts which have been discovered and is fruitful for the prediction of new experiments (1). One approach to mechanism is the study of stereochemistry which seeks information concerning the geometrical relationships between the reactants at the critical stages in the reaction. Information is gleaned from the examination of the products, if several isomers differing only in configuration may be formed, or from a study of the reactivity of closely related substances whose molecular shapes are varied in a specific manner. Occasionally a stereochemical fact places a considerable restraint upon the allowable mechanistic postulates, but the most effective employment of stereochemistry generally depends upon its detailed correlation with other experimental methods. [Pg.124]

Detailed mechanisms of intramolecular rearrangement reactions have been difficult to determine. Classical rate measurements seldom lead to unambiguous mechanistic predictions. Generally only after extensive examination of concentration, solvent, and substituent effects on the reaction rate can a general mechanistic class be proposed for example, intra vs intermolecular or bond rupture of a bidentate chelate vs non-bond rupture twist pathways. Indeed, only two examples of slow complexes are known where detailed rate comparisons for geometrical and optical iso-merizations were made and used to eliminate several mechanisms however, a single most probable pathway was not demonstrated in either case.12,13 Only with DNMR can detailed environmental site interchanges be directly observed and with this in-... [Pg.93]

Mechanically agitated contactors are characterized by complete backmix-ing of both liquid and gas phases thus Equation 16.24 should be applicable to these contactors. Deviation from MF is possible at low stirrer speeds. If the reaction is in regime 2, accurate values of are needed. Because predictive correlations for this are unreliable, the values should be obtained by conducting experiments in a geometrically similar laboratory reactor 20 30 cm diameter. To obtain such similarity, it is recommended that the ratio of tip speed to tank diameter should be kept constant (Juvekar, 1976). [Pg.501]


See other pages where Reaction mechanisms geometric predictions is mentioned: [Pg.19]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.574]    [Pg.527]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.829]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.873]    [Pg.497]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.494]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.468]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.340]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.641]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.103]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.964 ]




SEARCH



Reaction mechanisms prediction

Reaction prediction

© 2024 chempedia.info