Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Reaction mechanism, detecting change

Tubular reactors have empty spaces only between the catalyst particles. This eliminates one big disadvantage of CSTRs. On the other hand, the mathematical description and analysis of the data become more complicated. For chemical reaction studies it is still useful to detect major changes or differences in reaction mechanism. [Pg.154]

The present findings suggest that mechanistic and reaction product variations are not necessarily accompanied by a clear difference in reactivity and the TS structure, and hence experimentally observable quantities, such as relative reactivities (Hammett equation) and kinetic isotope effects (KIEs), which are commonly considered to be useful means to detect a change in reaction mechanism (77,72), may not always be useful. [Pg.386]

INFLUENCE OF OTHER STEPS ON THE MAGNITUDE OF OBSERVED ISOTOPE EFFECTS. As noted earlier, nonenzymatic reaction mechanisms do not involve those complexities imposed by substrate binding order, rates of substrate binding/release, as well as conformational changes that attend enzyme catalysis. As a result, the opportunity for detecting isotope effects is... [Pg.404]

The change from a stepwise preassociation mechanism through a triple ion intermediate to an uncoupled concerted reaction occurs as the triple ion becomes too unstable to exist in an energy well for the time of a bond vibration ( 10 s). The borderline between these two reaction mechanisms is poorly marked, and there are no clear experimental protocols for its detection. These two reaction mechanisms cannot be distinguished by experiments designed to characterize their transition states, which lie at essentially the same position in the inner upper right hand corner of Figure 2.3. Only low yields of the nucleophilic substitution product are obtained from both stepwise preassociation and uncoupled concerted reactions, because for formation of the preassociation complex in water is small... [Pg.56]

An underlying assumption of the Arrhenius equation is that the reaction mechanism does not change as a function of temperature. Since accelerated stability testing of pharmaceutical products normally employs a narrow range of temperature, it is often difficult to detect nonlinearity in the Arrhenius plot from experimental data, even though such nonlinearity is expected from the reaction mechanism [7]. [Pg.692]

For a catalyzed surface reaction like the exchange of H2 with D2 we cannot talk about a single mechanism for the reaction. We must specify the experimental conditions (pressure, surface coverage, temperature, and surface structure) as the reaction mechanism is likely to change with changing conditions of the experiments. Also, since there are several reaction paths available at the various surface sites, even under specified experimental conditions it is likely that the experimental technique utilized to monitor the reaction rate and product distribution may not detect products that form along the various reaction branches with equal probability. Thus, a combination of techniques that are employed over a wide range of experimental variables is necessary to reveal the nature of the complex catalytic process. [Pg.43]

Although product analysis seems essential for the clarification of complex ET processes involving biological molecules, only few attempts have so far been made. Ohde et al. [15,35] conducted bulk electrolysis to determine spectrophotometrically some redox products of interfacial ET reactions. Recently, Sawada et al. [39] have developed a microflow coulometric cell with a hydrophobic membrane-stabilized O/W interface. This microflow cell can accomplish complete electrolysis, and thus determination of the number of electrons for complex ET reactions at O/W interfaces. Also, its use for an on-line spectrophotometric detection of electrolysis products was made [43]. Figure 8.5 shows the spectmm change of the electrolyzed solution for the ET between Fc in NB and Fe(CN)e in W. When relatively small potentials were applied to the microflow cell, Fc" could be detected in the electrolyzed solution. The characteristic absorbance peak at 620 nm showed an undoubted existence of Fc+ in the W phase as the electrolysis product. This result would also support the IT mechanism. In situ UV-visible spectroscopy [44 46] also deserves attention for its usefulness in product analysis and clarification of reaction mechanisms. [Pg.177]


See other pages where Reaction mechanism, detecting change is mentioned: [Pg.62]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.447]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.690]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.434]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.616]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.618]    [Pg.522]    [Pg.2572]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.1076]    [Pg.2272]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.2296]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.495]    [Pg.2042]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.1048 ]




SEARCH



Changes Reaction

Reaction detection

© 2024 chempedia.info