Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Rates experience multiplier

Experience modification rates are multipliers used in most states workers compensation formulas. The rates are based on worker injury/illness loss history over a three year period (the first three of the last four years) and can drive workers compensation insurance costs up or down depending on the amount of loss that occurred over the three year period. An EMR of 1.0 is considered to be average. An EMR over 1.0 will increase the base premium. An EMR below 1.0 will result in a reduction to the base premium. Contractors should contact their workers compensation insurance carriers to obtain current and past EMRs. [Pg.23]

The experiment should be conducted at constant TCE concentration of 250 PPM. For this purpose, discharge enough flow from the reactor to maintain the concentration of TCE in the discharge flow at 250 PPM level. The forward pressure regulator keeps the reaction pressure constant. The difference between 500 and 250 PPM multiplied with the molar flow rate gives the moles per hour converted that may change continuously as the soda is consumed. [Pg.96]

Figure 6. Comparison of kinetic model predictions and experimental rates from the pressure variation experiment (400 K). The dashed line represents the experimental data offset by multiplying the pressure by a factor of five. Figure 6. Comparison of kinetic model predictions and experimental rates from the pressure variation experiment (400 K). The dashed line represents the experimental data offset by multiplying the pressure by a factor of five.
Rough feasibility estimate based on a general flowsheet using historial costs, charts, or the literature and using multiplying factors based on experience to scale for inflation, size differences, and tax rates. Examine Figure B. 1 for cost estimates based on entire plants as a function of capacity. [Pg.604]

The main experiment followed a similar procedure. The Joule calibration yields e. The cyclohexane solution of Cr(CO)6 and piperidine was irradiated for a period t. The heat released (Q) provided A0bs H via equation 10.5. If/ / t, then Q derived from the reference experiment needs to be multiplied by t/t. Alternatively, we can simply derive the rate of temperature increase during the irradiation. This rate multiplied by e is equal to rate of heat production (Q/t), which Adamson and co-workers called F. The difference between the radiant power (P) and F gives A0bsH/t. [Pg.150]

In order to determine the volume of activation, first the rate constant, k, is calculated from the measured reaction rate, r, and the concentration, Ca, through eqn. 3.2-19. The exponent n can be obtained from experiments at different concentrations. The value of k is then plotted on a logarithmic scale versus the pressure, and Av (10 6 cm3/mol) is evaluated from the slope, a, of the resulting straight line (Fig. 3.2-2). For this purpose a, (MPa ), is multiplied by the gas constant, R (8.314 J mol 1 K 1), and the temperature, T(K). [Pg.72]

The measured recovery of added 90Sr tracer in the QC sample is then taken to be the yield for all samples in a batch. If the 90Sr tracer is from a standard solution, then the QC sample measurements provide the combined yield and counting efficiency. (Note This is described in the alpha-particle spectral analysis in Experiment 15.) The 90Sr activity in each sample is its net count rate multiplied by the ratio of the QC sample activity (in Bq or pCi) to the average QC sample count rate. [Pg.113]

The positrons that arrive at the formation foil share the time structure of the electron accelerator, giving 2 ps long pulses of about 104 slow positrons at 600 Hz. Since a 7-ray detector would be saturated, the coincidence technique cannot be used, giving an order of magnitude worse signal-to-noise ratio than that in the previous experiments (due to 7 scintillations in the Lyman-a photo-multiplier), but the higher data rate more than compensates for this in total time to reach a given precision. [Pg.118]

Using a constant corrosion rate multiplied by the adsorption efficiency measured as described above, the rate of hydrogen absorption into the metal was calculated, and susceptibility to HIC was assumed to be established once a critical hydrogen concentration (Hc) was reached. A more detailed discussion of this simple conservative model, including a description of the determination of Hc from mechanical experiments, is described elsewhere (33). The conservatism in the model arises from the assumption that all the hydrogen absorbed is retained by the metal rather than released by oxidation as the corrosion process proceeds through the metal. As was emphasized in the introduction, such a conservatism is acceptable in a model where safety is the primary requirement. The approach described would be too conservative for an industrial service model. [Pg.238]

Heat transfer to the pan influences the evaporation rate differently for the ground or water experiments. To convert the pan measurements to those for a natural surface, Eq. (II-36) is multiplied by a pan coefficient that is 0.7 for the land pan and 0.8 for the floating pan. If the atmosphere is not convectively stable, vertical density gradients can cause substantial deviations from Hq. (1l-36). These problems are discussed in Refs. I0 to 13. [Pg.595]

Fourthly, the starting point for lifetime estimations is often laboratorygenerated kinetic data for reaction of the compound of interest with OH radicals. The bimolecular rate constants measured in laboratory kinetic experiments need to be converted into a pseudo first order rate constant for loss of the compound, k . In principal this conversion is simple, i.e., the bimolecular rate constant merely has to be multiplied by the OH concentration ([OH]). In practice there are difficulties associated with the choice of an appropriate value of [OH], At present we cannot measure the global OH concentration field directly. The OH radical concentration varies widely with location, season, and meteorological conditions. To account for such variations requires use of sophisticated 3D computer models of the atmosphere. [Pg.127]


See other pages where Rates experience multiplier is mentioned: [Pg.116]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.459]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.557]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.669]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.114]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.58 ]




SEARCH



Experience rating

Multipliers

Multiply

Multiplying

© 2024 chempedia.info