Rate expression, adsorption limiting determination

It has been suggested that the rate limiting step in the mechanism is the chemisorption of propionaldehyde and that the hydrogen undergoes dissociative adsorption on nickel. Determine if the rate expression predicted by a Hougen-Watson model based on these assumptions is consistent with the experimentally observed rate expression. 

In heterogeneous systems, the rate expressions have to be developed on the basis of (a) a relation between the rate and concentrations of the adsorbed species involved in the rate-determining step and (b) a relation between the latter and the directly observable concentrations or partial pressures in the gas phase. In consequence, to obtain adequate kinetic rate expressions it is necessary to have a knowledge of the reaction mechanism, and an accurate means of relating gas phase and surface concentrations through appropriate adsorption isotherms. The nature and types of adsorption isotherm appropriate to chemisorption processes have been discussed in detail elsewhere [16,17] and will not be discussed further except to note that, in spite of its severe theoretical limitations, the Langmuir isotherm is almost invariably used for kinetic interpretations of surface hydrogenation reactions. The appropriate equations are... 

An excellent illustration of the LHHW theory is catalytic cracking of n-alkanes over ZSM-5 [8]. For this reaction, the observed activation energy decreases from 140 to -50 ( ) kj/mol when the carbon number increases from 3 to 20. The decrease appeared to linearly depend on the carbon number as shown in Fig. 3.11. This dependence can be interpreted from a kinetic analysis that showed that the hydrocarbons (A) are adsorbed weakly under the experimental conditions. The initial rate expression for a rate-determining surface reaction applies (3.30), which in the limiting case of weak adsorption of A reduces to Eqn. (3.52). The activation energy is then represented by equation (3.53). 

In this example too, similar unexpected sizes and signs of activation energies are possible. The conclusion is that in catalytic reactions there are no readily definable limits to experimental overall activation energies or frequency factors. In order to determine if an experimentally determined overall parameter is acceptable we need to know its structure in terms of adsorption and rate constants from a mechanistic formulation of the full rate expression. Only then can we hope to be able to assign estimated values to the Arrhenius parameters of these more elementary constants. We can then compare the observed values of the composite constant with those that are justified when acceptable parameter values are assigned to the constituent elementary constants. 

In this system, glucose is postulated to form a complex with a carrier molecule at the outer surface of the cell. The sugar-carrier complex passes across the membrane and releases free glucose at the inner surface. The process is reversible. The maximum transport rate, Tmax, is limited by fixed properties of the system such as the total number of carriers and their movement. Below this limit, however, transport will vary with the sugar concentration since this determines the extent of complex formation according to Langmuir adsorption or Michaelis-Menten kinetics. Thus unidirectional transport into the cell can be expressed as follows ... 

On the other hand, the accelerated characteristics of CO tolerance have not been explained reasonably well. The authors recently proposed a model in which limiting current exists near operation current density in the presence of CO and it is determined by the rate of adsorption onto the trace amount of empty site of surface platinum uncovered by CO (Tabata et al. 2007). According to the model, the limiting current density i can be expressed by... 

Many catalyzed surface reactions can be treated as a two-step process with an adsorption equilibrium followed by one rate-determining step (diffusion, surface reaction, or desorption). The surface reaction kinetics are usually discussed in terms of two limiting mechanisms, the Langmuir-Hinshelwood (LH) and Eley-Rideal (ER) mechanisms. In the LH mechanism, reaction takes place directly between species which are chemically bonded (chemisorbed) on the surface. For a bimolecular LH surface reaction. Aawith competitive chemisorption of the reactants, the rate of reaction is given by the following expression ... 

The implication is that the adsorption energies of hydrocarbons can be of the same order of magnitude or even larger than the activation barriers of the intrinsic rate constants. In this section we will discuss expressions for the overall rate when the intrinsic reaction rate (e.g, proton activation) is rate determining. In the next section we will discuss the consequences especially for selectivities of a reaction when the desorption rates are rate limiting. To introduce the subject, we first present some simple expressions used in modeling monomolecular reactions. 

It should be noted that for the limiting case of 8 = 0 the expression tends to a Ward-Tordai-type equation. Liggieri et al. [17] also make the distinction that, even when adsorption appears to be diffusion controlled, there may still be an adsorption barrier present, and although it is not the rate-determining process, its existence should not be discounted entirely. 

We can now apply the method of resolution of the pure kinetics, with one of the preceding reactions as the rate determining step in pseudo-steady state mode. For each type of solid MG, we will obtain three solutions according to whether the determining step is adsorption, the reaction at internal interface i or at the external interface e (we exclude the modes limited by the heart reaction that we have never encountered). Table 15.4 provides the results obtained in conditions far from equilibrium. To obtain the expression of the reactivity in the opposite case, closed to equilibrium conditions, we have to multiply the preceding relations by the term ... 

---