Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Radical cage effect

Fig. 5 Rabinowitch and Wood apparatus for demonstrating the radical cage effect (reproduced from reference 189 with the permission of the Royal Society of Chemistry). Fig. 5 Rabinowitch and Wood apparatus for demonstrating the radical cage effect (reproduced from reference 189 with the permission of the Royal Society of Chemistry).
Radical cage effect and coupling (recombination) Radical coupling reactions do not dominate free radical chemistry as most radicals have very short lifetimes and are present in very low concentrations. Consequently, if short-lived radicals are to contribute to useful synthetic procedures by way of a radical coupling, all the events leading up to the coupling must take place in a solvent cage. [Pg.83]

The exact value depends slightly on a variety of conditions, including the identity of the trans axial ligand—so-called base-on or base-off forms—and the solvent, which results in considerable radical-cage effects. These issues are outlined in detail in Section 8.25.3.1. In contrast, the BDE for methyl B12 is approx. 155kJmoD The higher value is apparently sufficient to preclude cobalt-carbon homolysis in methylcobalamin-mediated reactions, and to allow for the heterolytic pathway to operate in methyl transferases. [Pg.680]

The inhibitive efficiency of boric acid polyesters differs greatly. The highest efficiency is exhibited by polyesters of boric acid, aromatic diols and triols. This derives from the fact that in this case the radicals are accepted not only by boron, but also by the aromatic nucleus. Among the aromatic polyesters, most efficient is ester of boric acid and pyrocatechin due to the Frank-Rabinovich cage effect. The efficiency of inhibi-... [Pg.88]

However, when MAIs are thermolyzed in solution, the role of the cage effect has to be taken into account. The thermolytically formed macroradicals can, due to their size, diffuse only slowly apart from each other. Therefore, the number of combination events will be much higher for MAIs than for low-molecular weight AIBN derivatives. As was shown by Smith [16], the tendency toward radical combination depends significantly on the rigidity and the bulkiness of the chain. Species such as cyclohexyl or diphenylmethyl incorporated into the MAI s main chain lead to the almost quantitative combination of the radicals formed upon thermolysis. In addition, combination chain transfer reactions may... [Pg.746]

Recombination reactions between two different macroradicals are readily observable in the condensed state where molecular mobility is restricted and the concentration of radicals is high. Its role in flow-induced degradation is probably negligible at the polymer concentration normally used in these experiments (< 100 ppm), the rate of radical formation is extremely small and the radicals are immediately separated by the velocity gradient at the very moment of their formation. Thus there is no cage effect, which otherwise could enhance the recombination efficiency. [Pg.132]

The value of initiator association and the rate constant may be evaluated. Viscosity is not expected to have a significant cage effect as in free radical systems, but the extent of association may be dependent on viscosity, or other properties of the fluid media. [Pg.379]

The efficiency of the intitiator is a measure of the extent to which the number of radicals formed reflects the number of polymer chains formed. Typical initiator efficiencies for vinyl polymerisations lie between 0.6 and 1.0. Clearly the efficiency cannot exceed 1.0 but it may fall below this figure for a number of reasons, the most important being the tendency of the newly generated free radicals to recombine before they have time to move apart. This phenomenon is called the cage effect . [Pg.25]

Figure 3. Calculated efficiencies. (1) From the cage effect model and no primary radical termination (Case I) (2) From the assumption of an overall efficiency and no primary radical termination (Case II) (3) From the assumption of an overall efficiency and primary radical termination (Case III) ( l) Calculated from equation (A) with fo - 0.663. Figure 3. Calculated efficiencies. (1) From the cage effect model and no primary radical termination (Case I) (2) From the assumption of an overall efficiency and no primary radical termination (Case II) (3) From the assumption of an overall efficiency and primary radical termination (Case III) ( l) Calculated from equation (A) with fo - 0.663.
The cage effect described above is also referred to as the Franck-Rabinowitch effect (5). It has one other major influence on reaction rates that is particularly noteworthy. In many photochemical reactions there is often an initiatioh step in which the absorption of a photon leads to homolytic cleavage of a reactant molecule with concomitant production of two free radicals. In gas phase systems these radicals are readily able to diffuse away from one another. In liquid solutions, however, the pair of radicals formed initially are caged in by surrounding solvent molecules and often will recombine before they can diffuse away from one another. This phenomenon is referred to as primary recombination, as opposed to secondary recombination, which occurs when free radicals combine after having previously been separated from one another. The net effect of primary recombination processes is to reduce the photochemical yield of radicals formed in the initiation step for the reaction. [Pg.217]

We have also investigated the kinetics of free radical initiation using azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN) as the initiator [24]. Using high pressure ultraviolet spectroscopy, it was shown that AIBN decomposes slower in C02 than in a traditional hydrocarbon liquid solvent such as benzene, but with much greater efficiency due to the decreased solvent cage effect in the low viscosity supercritical medium. The conclusion of this work was that C02 is inert to free radicals and therefore represents an excellent solvent for conducting free radical polymerizations. [Pg.112]

Such variation in the lifetimes of the ion pairs, which depends on the mode of activation, primarily arises from the difference in the spin multiplicities (see above). None the less, the long-lived ion-radical pair allows the in-cage proton transfer from the cation radical ArMe+ to the CA- anion radical to effectively compete with the back electron transfer,205 i.e.,... [Pg.263]

The influence of pressure on the cage effect was studied by Neuman and colleagues [95-98]. They measured the influence of pressure on the cage effect for competition between recombination and diffusion for the 1,1-dimethylethoxy radical pairs generated from bis(l,l-dimethylethyl)hyponitrite. The empirical activation volume difference (AF(f for the... [Pg.128]

The cage effect was also analyzed for the model of diffusion of two particles (radical pair) in viscous continuum using the diffusion equation [106], Due to initiator decomposition, two radicals R formed are separated by the distance r( at / = 0. The acceptor of free radicals Q is introduced into the solvent it reacts with radicals with the rate constant k i. Two radicals recombine with the rate constant kc when they come into contact at a distance 2rR, where rR is the radius of the radical R Solvent is treated as continuum with viscosity 17. The distribution of radical pairs (n) as a function of the distance x between them obeys the equation of diffusion ... [Pg.129]

The very low yield of radicals by the reaction of ozone with cumene was found to be the result of the intensive ozone reaction with the benzene ring of cumene with molozonide formation. The values of the parameter e in other reactions are typical of the cage effect of radical pairs in solutions. The rate constants of ozone reactions with various compounds are presented in Table 3.7 and Table 3.8. [Pg.132]

The cage effect is a component of this scheme. It takes place when the RO radical rapidly (within the time of the cage existence) reacts with the metal ion in the oxidized state. [Pg.394]

This is the result of cage effect. The cage of a solid polymer matrix is rigid (see earlier) and the most part of the forming radical pairs recombine in the cage. Hence, the probability of... [Pg.470]

The mechanism of antioxidant action on the oxidation of carbon-chain polymers is practically the same as that of hydrocarbon oxidation (see Chapters 14 and 15 and monographs [29 10]). The peculiarities lie in the specificity of diffusion and the cage effect in polymers. As described earlier, the reaction of peroxyl radicals with phenol occurs more slowly in the polymer matrix than in the liquid phase. This is due to the influence of the polymeric rigid cage on a bimolecular reaction (see earlier). The values of rate constants of macromolecular peroxyl radicals with phenols are collected in Table 19.7. [Pg.664]

Initiator decomposition studies of AIBN in supercritical C02 carried out by DeSimone et al. showed that there is kinetic deviation from the traditionally studied solvent systems.16 These studies indicated a measurable decrease in the thermal decomposition of AIBN in supercritical C02 over decomposition rates measured in benzene. Kirkwood correlation plots indicate that the slower rates in supercritical C02 emanate from the overall lower dielectric constant (e) of C02 relative to that ofbenzene. Similar studies have shown an analogous trend in the decomposition kinetics ofperfluoroalkyl acyl peroxides in liquid and supercritical C02.17 Rate decreases of as much as 30% have been seen compared to decomposition measured in 1,1,2-trichlorotrifluoroethane. These studies also served to show that while initiator decomposition is in general slower in supercritical C02, overall initiation is more efficient. Uv-visual studies incorporating radical scavengers concluded that primary geminate radicals formed during thermal decomposition in supercritical C02 are not hindered to the same extent by cage effects as are those in traditional solvents such as benzene. This effect noted in AIBN decomposition in C02 is ascribed to the substantially lower viscosity of supercritical C02 compared to that ofbenzene.18... [Pg.194]

Thus the quantum yield for acid production from triphenylsulfonium salts is 0.8 in solution and about 0.3 in the polymer 2 matrix. The difference between acid generating efficiencies in solution and film may be due in part to the large component of resin absorption. Resin excited state energy may not be efficiently transferred to the sulfonium salt. Furthermore a reduction in quantum yield is generally expected for a radical process carried out in a polymer matrix due to cage effects which prevent the escape of initially formed radicals and result in recombination (IS). However there are cases where little or no difference in quantum efficiency is noted for radical reactions in various media. Photodissociation of diacylperoxides is nearly as efficient in polystyrene below the glass transition point as in fluid solution (12). This case is similar to that of the present study since the dissociation involves a small molecule dispersed in a glassy polymer. [Pg.34]


See other pages where Radical cage effect is mentioned: [Pg.67]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.3781]    [Pg.3780]    [Pg.613]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.3781]    [Pg.3780]    [Pg.613]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.1596]    [Pg.1596]    [Pg.2593]    [Pg.425]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.394]    [Pg.456]    [Pg.456]    [Pg.457]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.24]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.83 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.99 , Pg.139 ]




SEARCH



Cage Effects on Stability and Molecular Dynamics of Amine Radicals in Zeolites

Cage effect

Cage effect, matrix isolation radicals

Cage, radical

Caging effects

Free radical chemistry cage effect

Radical caged

Radical effective

Radicals effects

Recombination, radical Cage effects

© 2024 chempedia.info