Race Relations Act

Tlie 1976 Race Relations Act (RRA) made employers liable for acts of racial discrimination committed by their employees in the course of their employment. However, police officers are office holders, not employees, and, therefore, chief officers of the police were not liable under the 1976 Act for acts of racial discrimination. The Commission for Racial Equality proposed that the Act be extended to include all public services and the amendment came into force in 2000. 

Race Relations Act 1976 requires that there be equal treatment of all people regardless of race or ethnic origin. However, again exceptions can be made where a breach of other legislation may be caused, such as Sikhs not wearing hard hats on a construction site or having beards in certain food... 

Race Relations Act 1976 is similar to the Sex Discrimination Acts but is aimed at ensuring that no one will be prejudiced in employment by virtue of their race, colour, nationality, ethnic or national origins. Issues arise with Sikhs and the wearing of hard hats and employment in the food industry. 

Several other recent pieces of legislation also play an important role in determining the relationship between employer and employee. The Equal Pay Act 1970 (see also the Equal Pay (Amendment) Regulations 1983 introducing the concept of equal value) introduces into all contracts an equality clause stating that where people are employed on broadly similar work with people of the opposite sex then any discrepancy in terms or conditions between them must be equalised upwards unless such differences can be explained on grounds other than difference of sex. The Sex Discrimination Act 1975 and the Race Relations Act 1976 render it unlawful for a person to treat another less favourably on sexual or racial grounds. Any employment variations must be shown to be justified for non-sexual or non-racial reasons. 

The overtly unfair discriminations that have been practised against women and ethnic minorities have been the target for social and political criticism. Since the mid-1970s legislation has been enacted to correct this state of affairs and there is now a body of law, judgements and tribunal decisions that provides a basis for guiding employers to act fairly and reasonably. Two major pieces of legislation are relevant The Sex Discrimination Act 1975 as modified by an 1986 Act and The Race Relations Act 1976. 

Discrimination Act 1975 as amended by the Employment Act 1989 and the Race Relations Act 1976 render it unlawful for a person to treat another less favourably on sexual or racial grounds. Any emplo5unent variations must be shown to be justified for non-sexual or non-racial reasons. A minimum wage was introduced by the National Minimum Wage Act 1998. 

The Misrepresentation Act 1967 Contract of Employment Act 1972 Equal Pay Act 1970 and 1975 Sex Discrimination Act 1975 and 1986 Race Relations Act 1976 Sale of Goods Act 1979 Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 Occupier s LiabUity Acts 1957 and 1984 Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 Consumer Protection Act 1987 Equal Pay (Amendment) Regulations 1983 Social Security Act 1986... 

Nonetheless, many African American scientists. Just included, noted a curious pattern over the course of their careers that their work was cited more frequently in European than in American journals. This pattern of particularism was counter to the notion of objectivity. African American scientists were correct to assume that their relatively low rate of citation on one side of the Atlantic was related to their racial status. However, this is not to argue that European scientists were more accepting of African Americans. Rather they seemed to have had fewer ways than did white Americans of discerning race and, therefore, of acting on their prejudices. European scientists did not know the African American scientists personally, nor were they generally aware of predominantly black institutions (Manning, 1983, p. 332). 

Write job-related and nondiscriminatory questions Avoid any questions that are not directly related to the essential functions of the position or that may be construed as discriminatory In general, it is inappropriate to ask questions about an individual s race, color, religion, sex, or national or ethnic origin (Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964), their age (Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967), or disability status (Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990), as well as their marital status, sexual orientation, or parenting responsibilities. 

A pseudoracemate approach, wherein one of the isomers of the race-mate is stable labeled and acts as a stereochemical marker, circumvents the issues related to derivatization methods and use of chiral columns for analysis of race-mates. Separation and detection by mass spectrometry, using another stable-labeled variant as the internal standard when possible, allows quantitation of the... 

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related laws and executive orders The safety and health professional should possess a working knowledge of the prohibition against discrimination based upon race, sex, color, creed or religion, and national origin. 

---