Quantum quantitative structure activity relationships equation

Fundamental Quantum Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships Equation... 

Molecular Similarity and QSAR. - In a first contribution on the design of a practical, fast and reliable molecular similarity index Popelier107 proposed a measure operating in an abstract space spanned by properties evaluated at BCPs, called BCP space. Molecules are believed to be represented compactly and reliably in BCP space, as this space extracts the relevant information from the molecular ab initio wave functions. Typical problems of continuous quantum similarity measures are hereby avoided. The practical use of this novel method is adequately illustrated via the Hammett equation for para- and me/a-substituted benzoic acids. On the basis of the author s definition of distances between molecules in BCP space, the experimental sequence of acidities determined by the well-known a constant of a set of substituted congeners is reproduced. Moreover, the approach points out where the common reactive centre of the molecules is. The generality and feasibility of this method will enable predictions in medically related Quantitative Structure Activity Relationships (QSAR). This contribution combines the historically disparate fields of molecular similarity and QSAR. 

Interestingly, most quantitative structural activity relationship (QSAR) studies usually commence by considering o (Hammett substitution constant) and, in case there exists more than one substituent, the a values are represented in a summed up manner as Za. Keeping in view the enormous quantum of synthetic newer target drug molecules, it has now become almost necessary and possible either to modify/refine or fine tune-up the QSAR equation. In fact, a substituent s resonance effect (R) and inductive effect (F) may be quantified as far as possible with the help of available tables of constants . In certain instances one may evidently observe that ... 

As previously mentioned, the acronym QSAR stands for the quantitative structure-activity relationship. However, there may be some ambiguity associated with the attribute quantitative. It does not necessarily follows that results expressed or having numerical representation are necessarily quantitative. Qualitative results can equally be numerically represented. Strictly speaking, we define and view QSAR models as quantitative only when the numerically expressed models allow meaningful interpretation of the numerical results obtained for the structure-activity relationship within the basic concepts of the particular model. This means that the physicochemical models should allow quantitative interpretation of the numerical physicochemical descriptors used and that the structure-mathematical models should allow quantitative interpretation of the numerical structure-mathematical descriptors used. We will use the symbol qsar and QSAR as the abbreviation for qualitative structure-activity relationship. Such are the relationships that are non-numerical and the relationships that may be numerical but the variables used are interrelated and thus do not allow unique interpretation of the MRA equations. Because all molecular descriptors hitherto used in QSAR, whether they are based on physicochemical properties, quantum mechanical calculations, or molecular graphs, are all interrelated, it follows that all such hitherto reported results, without further elaboration, remain essentially qualitative, being qsar rather than QSAR. 

---