Quantum numbers, 92 element

We have described here one particular type of molecular synnnetry, rotational symmetry. On one hand, this example is complicated because the appropriate symmetry group, K (spatial), has infinitely many elements. On the other hand, it is simple because each irreducible representation of K (spatial) corresponds to a particular value of the quantum number F which is associated with a physically observable quantity, the angular momentum. Below we describe other types of molecular synnnetry, some of which give rise to finite synnnetry groups. 

The diagonal elements of the matrix [Eqs. (31) and (32)], actually being an effective operator that acts onto the basis functions Ro,i, are diagonal in the quantum number I as well. The factors exp( 2iAct)) [Eqs. (27)] determine the selection rule for the off-diagonal elements of this matrix in the vibrational basis—they couple the basis functions with different I values with one another (i.e., with I — l A). 

It follows that the only possible values for la + Ip are S A and the computation of vibronic levels can be carried out for each K block separately. Matrix elements of the electronic operator diagonal with respect to the electronic basis [first of Eqs. (60)], and the matrix elements of T are diagonal with respect to the quantum number I = la + Ip. The off-diagonal elements of [second and third of Eqs. (60)] connect the basis functions with I — la + Ip and I — l + l — l 2A. 

The trends in chemical and physical properties of the elements described beautifully in the periodic table and the ability of early spectroscopists to fit atomic line spectra by simple mathematical formulas and to interpret atomic electronic states in terms of empirical quantum numbers provide compelling evidence that some relatively simple framework must exist for understanding the electronic structures of all atoms. The great predictive power of the concept of atomic valence further suggests that molecular electronic structure should be understandable in terms of those of the constituent atoms. 

Symmetry provides additional quantum numbers or labels to use in describing the mos. Each such quantum number further sub-divides the collection of all mos into sets that have vanishing Hamiltonian matrix elements among members belonging to different sets. 

The period (or row) of the periodic table m which an element appears corresponds to the principal quantum number of the highest numbered occupied orbital (n = 1 m the case of hydrogen and helium) Hydrogen and helium are first row elements lithium in = 2) IS a second row element... 

We often say that an electron is a spin-1/2 particle. Many nuclei also have a corresponding internal angular momentum which we refer to as nuclear spin, and we use the symbol I to represent the vector. The nuclear spin quantum number I is not restricted to the value of 1/2 it can have both integral and halfintegral values depending on the particular isotope of a particular element. All nuclei for which 7 1 also posses a nuclear quadrupole moment. It is usually given the symbol Qn and it is related to the nuclear charge density Pn(t) in much the same way as the electric quadrupole discussed earlier ... 

The bra n denotes a complex conjugate wave function with quantum number n standing to the of the operator, while the ket m), denotes a wave function with quantum number m standing to the right of the operator, and the combined bracket denotes that the whole expression should be integrated over all coordinates. Such a bracket is often referred to as a matrix element. The orthonormality condition eq. (3.5) can then be written as. 

We now know that electrons in atoms can hold only particular energies and that their probable whereabouts are described by Schrodiiiger s wave function. The energies and probable locations depend on integer numbers, or quantum numbers. Quantum numbers describe the energy and geometry of the possible electronic states of an atom. These states, in turn, deteriiiilie the chemical behavior of the elements—that is, how chemical bonds can form. 

The two sets of 14 elements listed separately at the bottom of the table are filling f sublevels with a principal quantum number two less than the period number. That is—... 

If we proceed to the next element, sodium atom, we are again forced to use an orbital with the next higher quantum number ... 

We see that the rows of the periodic table arise from filling orbitals of approximately the same energy. When all orbitals of similar energy are full (two electrons per orbital), the next electron must be placed in an s orbital that has a higher principal quantum number, and a new period of the table starts. We can summarize the relation between the number of elements in each row of the periodic table and the available orbitals of approximately equal energy in Table 15-V. 

According to the Stoner scheme the electronic configuration for the element sulphur, for example, is 2, 2, 2t 4, 2, 2, 2. This configuration could account successfully for the various valency states shown by the element, that is 2, 4, 6 as mentioned before. However, this new scheme did nothing to resolve the problem of the violation of quantum numbers as seen in the splitting of spectral lines in a magnetic field. 

But does the fact that the third shell can contain 18 electrons, for example, which emerges from the relationships among the quantum numbers, also explain why some of the periods in the periodic system contain eighteen places Actually not exactly. If electron shells were filled in a strictly sequential manner there would be no problem and the explanation would in fact be complete. But as everyone is aware, the electron shells do not fill in the expected sequential manner. The configuration of element number 18, or argon is,... 

But I want to return to my claim that quantum mechanics does not really explain the fact that the third row contains 18 elements to take one example. The development of the first of the period from potassium to krypton is not due to the successive filling of 3s, 3p and 3d electrons but due to the filling of 4s, 3d and 4p. It just so happens that both of these sets of orbitals are filled by a total of 18 electrons. This coincidence is what gives the common explanation its apparent credence in this and later periods of the periodic table. As a consequence the explanation for the form of the periodic system in terms of how the quantum numbers are related is semi-empirical, since the order of orbital filling is obtained form experimental data. This is really the essence of Lowdin s quoted remark about the (n + , n) rule. 

---