Quantum mechanics matrix formulation

Matrix algebra is a key mathematical tool in doing modern-day quantum-mechanical calculations on molecules. Matrices also furnish a convenient way to formulate much of the theory of quantum mechanics. Matrix methods will be used in some later chapters, but this book is written so that the material on matrices can be omitted if time does not allow this material to be covered. 

Systems of reversible first-order reactions lead to sets of simultaneous linear differential equations with constant coefficients. A solution may be obtained by means of a matrix formulation that is widely used in quantum mechanics and vibrational... 

In die matrix formulation of quantum mechanics Eq. <121) is transformed. If P and Q are matrices, the Hamiltonian becomes by analogy... 

Since the early days of quantum mechanics, the wave function theory has proven to be very successful in describing many different quantum processes and phenomena. However, in many problems of quantum chemistry and solid-state physics, where the dimensionality of the systems studied is relatively high, ab initio calculations of the structure of atoms, molecules, clusters, and crystals, and their interactions are very often prohibitive. Hence, alternative formulations based on the direct use of the probability density, gathered under what is generally known as the density matrix theory [1], were also developed since the very beginning of the new mechanics. The independent electron approximation or Thomas-Fermi model, and the Hartree and Hartree-Fock approaches are former statistical models developed in that direction [2]. These models can be considered direct predecessors of the more recent density functional theory (DFT) [3], whose principles were established by Hohenberg,... 

In Chapter 1 we have discussed the familiar realization of quantum mechanics in terms of differential operators acting on the space of functions (the Schrodinger wave function formulation, also called wave mechanics ). A different realization can be obtained by means of creation and annihilation operators, leading to an algebraic formulation of quantum mechanics, sometimes called matrix mechanics. For problems with no spin, the formulation is done in terms of boson creation, b (, and annihilation, ba, operators, satisfying the commutation relations... 

Indeed, there are otlier formulations of quantum mechanics, all of which have been shown to be entirely equivalent in a formal sense to the matrix-algebraic-molecular-orbital version, that do not in any way require an invocation of orbitals. However, the matrix-algebraic method lends itself most readily to implementation on the architecture of a digital computer, and thus it has come to overwhehningly dominate modem computational chemistry. As a result, the orbitals that are part of the computational machinery for approximately solving the matrix algebraic equations have taken on the character of unassailable parts of the quantum mechanical formalism, but that status is undeserved. 

We formulated quantum mechanics in Chapter 1 in terms of operators and their eigenfunctions. There exists an alternative formulation (Section 2.3) in terms of matrices and their eigenvectors, which is sometimes more convenient than the operator formulation. Matrix algebra was developed by Cayley in the mid-nineteenth century. Scientists remained unaware of matrices until 1925, when quantum mechanics was born. Today there is hardly a branch of science from physics to psychology that does not use matrices. 

We now show how the fundamental problem of quantum mechanics, the finding of the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of F, G,... is formulated using matrix algebra. 

Matrices are also a great convenience in the theoretical development of quantum chemistry. They make possible an economy of notation, and use of matrix-algebra theorems simplifies derivations considerably. Much of the quantum chemistry literature is formulated in matrix language. The vector-space formulation of quantum mechanics (which we have just touched on) is very fruitful for advanced applications see Merzbacher, Chapter 14 and later chapters. 

Integrals of the general type 5.2-4 occur frequently in quantum mechanical problems. They are often termed matrix elements, since they occur as such in the secular equations which commonly provide the best way of formulating the problem (see Chapters 7, 8, and 10 for examples of secular equations). In order to give the results just presented in Section 5.2 some concrete meaning, we shall discuss here the two commonest examples of the type of matrix element represented in 5.2-4. 

The theoretical tools of quantum chemistry briefly described in the previous chapter are numerously implemented, sometimes explicitly and sometimes implicitly, in ab initio, density functional (DFT), and semi-empirical theories of quantum chemistry and in the computer program suits based upon them. It is usually believed that the difference between the methods stems from different approximations used for the one- and two-electron matrix elements of the molecular Hamiltonian eq. (1.177) employed throughout the calculation. However, this type of classification is not particularly suitable in the context of hybrid methods where attention must be drawn to the way of separating the entire molecular system (eventually - the universe itself) into parts, of which some are treated explicitly on a quantum mechanical/chemical level, while others are considered classically and the rest is not addressed at all. That general formulation allows us to cover both the traditional quantum chemistry methods based on the wave functions and the DFT-based methods, which generally claim... 

Despite his skepticism, Pauli learned the intricacies of matrix mathematics and applied the Heisenberg version of the new quantum mechanics to the hydrogen atom. In less than three weeks, Pauli obtained the same formula that Bohr had obtained in 1913, only this time the route to the formula was a coherent theory—the new theory of quantum mechanics. Herewith, wrote Pauli, it has been demonstrated that the Balmer terms come out directly from the new quantum mechanics. So momentous was this demonstration that the skeptic Pauli became a believer in the matrix mathematical formulation of Born, Heisenberg, and Jordan. 

These results were obtained by using the time-dependent quantum mechanical evolution of a state vector. We have generalized these to non-equilibrium situations [16] with the given initial state in a thermodynamic equilibrium state. This theory employs the density matrix which obeys the von Neumann equation. To incorporate the thermodynamic initial condition along with the von Neumann equation, it is advantageous to go to Liouville (L) space instead of the Hilbert (H) space in which DFT is formulated. This L-space quantum theory was developed by Umezawa over the last 25 years. We have adopted this theory to set up a new action principle which leads to the von Neumann equation. Appropriate variants of the theorems above are deduced in this framework. 

Here, the potential energy and the wavefunction depend on the three space coordinates x, y, z, which we write for brevity as r. We have thus arrived at the time-dependent Schriidinger equation for the amplitude I (r, t) of the matter waves associated with the particle. Its formulation in 1926 represents the starting point of modem quantum mechanics. (Heisenberg in 1925 proposed another version known as matrix mechanics.)... 

Schrodinger discovered the equation that bears his name in 1926, and it has provided the foundation for the wave-mechanical formulation of quantum mechanics. Heisenberg had independently, and somewhat earlier, proposed a matrix formulation of the problem, which Schrodinger later showed was an equivalent alternative to his approach. We choose to present Schrodinger s version because its physical interpretation is much easier to understand. 

The second reason to introduce the derivation (6 -9) is to note that all that is required to evaluate the absorption and emission probability F A (t, r) of (9) are matrix elements of the evolution operator exp(-i//r/h). (These matrix elements are the conventional probability amplitudes When considering a situation in which many different kinds of decay processes are involved, e.g. radiative and nonradiative decay, it is not always convenient to deal directly with the matrix elements of exp(-itfr/h), the af(t). Rather, it is simpler to introduce (imaginary) Laplace transforms 16) in the same manner that electrical engineers use them to solve ac circuit equations 33L Thus, if E is the transform variable conjugate to t, the transforms of af(t) are gf(E). The quantities gf (E) can also be labeled by the initial state k and are denoded by Gjk(E). It is customary in quantum mechanics to collect all these Gjk(E) into a matrix G(E). Since matrix methods in quantum mechanics imply some choice of basis set and all physical observables are independent of the chosen basis set, it is convenient to employ operator formulations. If G (E) is the operator whose matrix elements are Gjk(E), then it is well known that G(E) is the Green s function i6.3o.34) or resolvent operator... 

In the calculations of the matrix elements concerned, three points are to be taken into account (i) the operator (projector) A is idempotent (ii) the Hamiltonian H is formulated according to the principles of quantum mechanics and as such it commutes with A as well as with the individual spin-space permutations (iii) the spin-dependent... 

---