Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Quantum dots energy levels

Hyun et al. [345] prepared PbS Q-dots in a suspension and tethered them to Ti02 nanoparticles with a bifunctional thiol-carboxyl linker molecule. Strong size dependence due to quantum confinement was inferred from cyclic voltammetry measurements, for the electron affinity and ionization potential of the attached Q-dots. On the basis of the measured energy levels, the authors claimed that pho-toexcited electrons should transfer efficiently from PbS into T1O2 only for dot diameters below 4.3 nm. Continuous-wave fluorescence spectra and fluorescence transients of the PbS/Ti02 assembly were consistent with electron transfer from small Q-dots. The measured charge transfer time was surprisingly slow ( 100 ns). Implications of this fact for future photovoltaics were discussed, while initial results from as-fabricated sensitized solar cells were presented. [Pg.290]

Fig. 5.20 Schematic diagram illustrating the energy levels of different-sized CdSe quantum dots and Ti02 (band positions are not drawn to scale). The injection of electrons from CdSe into Ti02 is influenced by the energy difference between the two conduction bands. [Adapted (in gray scale) from [351]]... Fig. 5.20 Schematic diagram illustrating the energy levels of different-sized CdSe quantum dots and Ti02 (band positions are not drawn to scale). The injection of electrons from CdSe into Ti02 is influenced by the energy difference between the two conduction bands. [Adapted (in gray scale) from [351]]...
Figure 17.3 Energy level diagram (A) and splitting of lSelS3/2 band-edge states (B) in CdSe quantum dots. Reprinted with permission from references [17] (A) and [16] (B) copyright [1999,... Figure 17.3 Energy level diagram (A) and splitting of lSelS3/2 band-edge states (B) in CdSe quantum dots. Reprinted with permission from references [17] (A) and [16] (B) copyright [1999,...
Discrete energy levels are to be observed for position (a) as well as for position (b) at exactly the same values, in case (b) somewhat better expressed than in (a). The level spacing is 135 mV. This spectrum clearly identifies the Au55 cluster as a quantum dot in the classical sense, having discrete electronic energy levels, though broader than in an atom, but nevertheless existent. The description of such quantum dots as artificial, big atoms seems indeed to be justified. [Pg.11]

Bakkers EP, Hens Z, Kouwenhoven LP, Gurevich L, Vanmaekelbergh D (2002) A tunneling spectroscopy study on the single-particle energy levels and electron-electron interactions in CdSe quantum dots. Nanotechnology 13 258-262... [Pg.214]

Figure 10.9. (a) Schematic structure of a silicon quantum dot crystal and (b) its calculated electronic structure as a function of interparticle distance H. The size of the nanoparticles is L = 6.5 nm. At small H, a splitting of the quantized energy levels of single dots results in the formation of three-dimensional minibands. Reproduced from Ref. 64, Copyright 2001, with permission from the American Institute of Physics. [Pg.324]

Abstract Silver clusters, composed of only a few silver atoms, have remarkable optical properties based on electronic transitions between quantized energy levels. They have large absorption coefficients and fluorescence quantum yields, in common with conventional fluorescent markers. But importantly, silver clusters have an attractive set of features, including subnanometer size, nontoxicity and photostability, which makes them competitive as fluorescent markers compared with organic dye molecules and semiconductor quantum dots. In this chapter, we review the synthesis and properties of fluorescent silver clusters, and their application as bio-labels and molecular sensors. Silver clusters may have a bright future as luminescent probes for labeling and sensing applications. [Pg.307]

Figure 2.5. Energy level diagram (top) and spectra (bottom) illustrating the two-state model of relaxation. The energy of the absorbed quantum is Av , and the energies of the emitted quanta are hvfl (unrelaxed) and hvF (relaxed). The fluorescence spectrum of the unrelaxed state (solid curve) is shifted relative to the absorption spectrum (dotted curve) due to the Stokes shift. The emission intensity from the unrelaxed state decreases and that from the relaxed state (dashed curve) increases as a result of relaxation. Figure 2.5. Energy level diagram (top) and spectra (bottom) illustrating the two-state model of relaxation. The energy of the absorbed quantum is Av , and the energies of the emitted quanta are hvfl (unrelaxed) and hvF (relaxed). The fluorescence spectrum of the unrelaxed state (solid curve) is shifted relative to the absorption spectrum (dotted curve) due to the Stokes shift. The emission intensity from the unrelaxed state decreases and that from the relaxed state (dashed curve) increases as a result of relaxation.
Fig. 2.6. Quantum transmission through a thin potential harrier. From the semi-classical point of view, the transmission through a high barrier, tunneling, is qualitatively different from that of a low barrier, ballistic transport. Nevertheless, for a thin barrier, here W = 3 A, the logarithm of the exact quantum mechanical transmission coefficient (solid curve) is nearly linear to the barrier height from 4 eV above the energy level to 2 eV below the energy level. As long as the barrier is thin, there is no qualitative difference between tunneling and ballistic transport. Also shown (dashed and dotted curves) is how both the semiclassical method (WKB) and Bardeen s tunneling theory become inaccurate for low barriers. Fig. 2.6. Quantum transmission through a thin potential harrier. From the semi-classical point of view, the transmission through a high barrier, tunneling, is qualitatively different from that of a low barrier, ballistic transport. Nevertheless, for a thin barrier, here W = 3 A, the logarithm of the exact quantum mechanical transmission coefficient (solid curve) is nearly linear to the barrier height from 4 eV above the energy level to 2 eV below the energy level. As long as the barrier is thin, there is no qualitative difference between tunneling and ballistic transport. Also shown (dashed and dotted curves) is how both the semiclassical method (WKB) and Bardeen s tunneling theory become inaccurate for low barriers.
As a crystal of a semiconductor becomes smaller, fewer atomic orbitals are available to contribute to the bands. The orbitals are removed from each of the band edges (cf. Chapter 4, Figure 4.6) until, at a point when the crystal is very small—a dot —the bands are no longer a continuum of orbitals, but individual quantised orbital energy levels (Figure 11.2(b)), thus the name quantum dots. At the same... [Pg.421]

The fuzzy frontier between the molecular and the nanometric level can be elucidated from an electronic point of view. Molecules and small clusters can be described as systems in which the metal atoms form well-defined bonding and antibonding orbitals. Large clusters or small nanoparticles (quantum dots) with dimensions of a few nanometers are intermediate between the size of molecules and bulk material, presenting discrete energy levels with a small band gap owing to quantum-mechanical rules. Finally, larger particles tend to lose this trend and display a typical band structure similar to that of the bulk material. [Pg.139]

A schematic view of the nanomechanical GMR device to be considered is presented in Fig. 1. Two fully spin-polarized magnets with fully spin-polarized electrons serve as source and drain electrodes in a tunneling device. In this paper we will consider the situation when the electrodes have exactly opposite polarization. A mechanically movable quantum dot (described by a time-dependent displacement x(t)), where a single energy level is available for electrons, performs forced harmonic oscillations with period T = 2-k/uj between the leads. The external magnetic field is perpendicular to the orientation of the magnetization in both leads. [Pg.310]

The Energy Level Structure of Low-dimensional Multi-electron Quantum Dots... [Pg.177]

In the present contribution the interpretation of the energy-level structure of quasi-one-dimensional quantum dots of two and three electrons is reviewed in detail by examining the polyad structure of the energy levels and the symmetry of the spatial part of the Cl wave functions due to the Pauli principle. The interpretation based on the polyad quantum number is applied to the four electron case and is shown to be applicable to general multi-electron cases. The qualitative differences in the energy-level structure between quasi-one-dimensional and quasi-ta>o-dimensional quantum dots are briefly discussed by referring to differences in the structure of their internal space. [Pg.178]


See other pages where Quantum dots energy levels is mentioned: [Pg.646]    [Pg.655]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.1048]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.486]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.425]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.562]    [Pg.947]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.178]   


SEARCH



Energy quantum

Quantum dot

Quantum energy levels

Quantum level

© 2024 chempedia.info