Quantum ansatz

The usual quantum ansatz is applied to this equation to obtain a wave equation ... 

On the quantum level, Eq. (229) becomes an operator equation, and, using the quantum ansatz, we obtain... 

Conventional single particle quantization is based on the quantum ansatz (399) applied to the Einstein equation (415) to produce the Klein-Gordon equation... 

Figure C3.5.6 compares the result of this ansatz to the numerical result from the Wiener-Kliintchine theorem. They agree well and the ansatz exliibits the expected exponential energy-gap law (VER rate decreases exponentially with Q). The ansatz was used to detennine the VER rate with no quantum correction Q= 1), with the Bader-Beme hannonic correction [61] and with a correction based [83, M] on Egelstaff s method [62]. The Egelstaff corrected results were within a factor of five of experiment, whereas other corrections were off by orders of magnitude. This calculation represents the present state of the art in computing VER rates in such difficult systems, inasmuch as the authors used only a model potential and no adjustable parameters. However the ansatz procedure is clearly not extendible to polyatomic molecules or to diatomic molecules in polyatomic solvents.

In the mixed quantum-classical molecular dynamics (QCMD) model (see [11, 9, 2, 3, 5] and references therein), most atoms are described by classical mechanics, but an important small portion of the system by quantum mechanics. The full quantum system is first separated via a tensor product ansatz. The evolution of each part is then modeled either classically or quan-tally. This leads to a coupled system of Newtonian and Schrbdinger equations. 

In many chemical and even biological systems the use of an ab initio quantum dynamics method is either advantageous or mandatory. In particular, photochemical reactions may be most amenable to these methods because the dynamics of interest is often completed on a short (subpicosecond) timescale. The AIMS method has been developed to enable a realistic modeling of photochemical reactions, and in this review we have tried to provide a concise description of the method. We have highlighted (a) the obstacles that should be overcome whenever an ab initio quantum chemistry method is coupled to a quantum propagation method, (b) the wavefunction ansatz and fundamental... 

The goal of this chapter is twofold. First we wish to critically compare—from both a conceptional and a practical point of view—various classical and mixed quantum-classical strategies to describe non-Born-Oppenheimer dynamics. To this end. Section II introduces five multidimensional model problems, each representing a specific challenge for a classical description. Allowing for exact quantum-mechanical reference calculations, aU models have been used as benchmark problems to study approximate descriptions. In what follows, Section III describes in some detail the mean-field trajectory method and also discusses its connection to time-dependent self-consistent-field schemes. The surface-hopping method is considered in Section IV, which discusses various motivations of the ansatz as well as several variants of the implementation. Section V gives a brief account on the quantum-classical Liouville description and considers the possibility of an exact stochastic realization of its equation of motion. 

To summarize, the results presented for five representative examples of nonadiabatic dynamics demonstrate the ability of the MFT method to account for a qualitative description of the dynamics in case of processes involving two electronic states. The origin of the problems to describe the correct long-time relaxation dynamics as well as multi-state processes will be discussed in more detail in Section VI. Despite these problems, it is surprising how this simplest MQC method can describe complex nonadiabatic dynamics. Other related approximate methods such as the quantum-mechanical TDSCF approximation have been found to completely fail to account for the long-time behavior of the electronic dynamics (see Fig. 10). This is because the standard Hartree ansatz in the TDSCF approach neglects all correlations between the dynamical DoF, whereas the ensemble average performed in the MFT treatment accounts for the static correlation of the problem. 

R. J. Bartlett, S. A. Kucharski, J. Noga, J. D. Watts, and G. W. Trucks, Some consideration of alternative ansatze in coupled-cluster theory, in Many-Body Methods in Quantum Chemistry (U. Kaldor, ed.). Springer, Berlin, 1989, p. 125. 

For the description of a solution of alanine in water two models were compared and combined with one another (79), namely the continuum model approach and the cluster ansatz approach (148,149). In the cluster approach snapshots along a trajectory are harvested and subsequent quantum chemical analysis is carried out. In order to learn more about the structure and the effects of the solvent shell, the molecular dipole moments were computed. To harvest a trajectory and for comparison AIMD (here CPMD) simulations were carried out (79). The calculations contained one alanine molecule dissolved in 60 water molecules. The average dipole moments for alanine and water were derived by means of maximally localized Wannier functions (MLWF) (67-72). For the water molecules different solvent shells were selected according to the three radial pair distributions between water and the functional groups. An overview about the findings is given in Tables II and III. 

We start with the basic relationships ( Ansatz ) of collision-induced spectra (Section 5.1). Next we consider spectral moments and their virial expansions (Section 5.2) two- and three-body moments of low order will be discussed in some detail. An analogous virial expansion of the line shape follows (Section 5.3). Quantum and classical computations of binary line shapes are presented in Sections 5.4 and 5.5, which are followed by a discussion of the symmetry of the spectral profiles (Section 5.6). Many-body effects on line shape are discussed in Sections 5.7 and 5.8, particularly the intercollisional dip. We conclude this Chapter with a brief discussion of model line shapes (Section 5.10). 

As already discussed at the end of Section 2.2.3, we derived a universal superposition principle from a complex symmetric ansatz arriving at a Klein-Gordon-like equation relevant for the theory of special relativity. This approach, which posits a secular-like operator equation in terms of energy and momenta, was adjoined with a conjugate formal operator representation in terms of time and position. As it will be seen, this provides a viable extension to the general theory [7, 82]. We will hence recover Einstein s laws of relativity as construed from the overall global superposition, demonstrating in addition the independent choice of a classical and/or a quantum representation. In this way, decoherence to classical reality seems always possible provided that appropriate operator realizations are made. 

---