Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Quantitative structure-activity relationships experimental results

More recently (2006) we performed and reported quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling of the same compounds based on their atomic linear indices, for finding fimctions that discriminate between the tyrosinase inhibitor compounds and inactive ones [50]. Discriminant models have been applied and globally good classifications of 93.51 and 92.46% were observed for nonstochastic and stochastic hnear indices best models, respectively, in the training set. The external prediction sets had accuracies of 91.67 and 89.44% [50]. In addition to this, these fitted models have also been employed in the screening of new cycloartane compounds isolated from herbal plants. Good behavior was observed between the theoretical and experimental results. These results provide a tool that can be used in the identification of new tyrosinase inhibitor compounds [50]. [Pg.85]

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship studies search for a relationship between the activity/toxicity of chemicals and the numerical representation of their structure and/or features. The overall task is not easy. For instance, several environmental properties are relatively easy to model, but some toxicity endpoints are quite difficult, because the toxicity is the result of many processes, involving different mechanisms. Toxicity data are also affected by experimental errors and their availability is limited because experiments are expensive. A 3D-QSAR model reflects the characteristics of... [Pg.191]

Recently, hologram quantitative structure-activity relationship (HQSAR) was conducted by Moda et al. [63] on a series of structurally diverse molecules with known PPB. The best statistical model (n — 250, r2 = 0.91, and q2 — 0.72) was used to predict the PPB of 62 test set compounds, and the predicted values were in good agreement with the experimental results (ntest —62, q2 — 0.86, RMSEtest = 12%). It is indicated that this model used a much smaller data set than the VolSurf and Wang7s models. [Pg.116]

Although little structural information is available for the CYP enzymes, the amount of experimental data on the substrates and inhibitors is growing rapidly. As a result, ligand-based analyses, quantitative structure-activity relationship... [Pg.463]

Figure 3. Plot of the logarithm of experimentally determined rate constants (iccat, min ) against energy barriers calculated with a QM/MM method for hydroxylation of severalparahydroxybenzoate derivatives by the enzymepara-hydroxybenzoate hydroxylase (PHBH), showing a linear correlation (r=0.96) between the calculated and experimental results [49,50]. This correlation supports the proposed mechanistic scheme, and the identification of the hydroxylation step as rate-limiting within it. It also validates the QM/MM method for this application, and shows that QM/MM results can be predictive and will be useful in the development of quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR). (Adapted from ref. 49, with thanks to Dr. L. Ridder). Figure 3. Plot of the logarithm of experimentally determined rate constants (iccat, min ) against energy barriers calculated with a QM/MM method for hydroxylation of severalparahydroxybenzoate derivatives by the enzymepara-hydroxybenzoate hydroxylase (PHBH), showing a linear correlation (r=0.96) between the calculated and experimental results [49,50]. This correlation supports the proposed mechanistic scheme, and the identification of the hydroxylation step as rate-limiting within it. It also validates the QM/MM method for this application, and shows that QM/MM results can be predictive and will be useful in the development of quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR). (Adapted from ref. 49, with thanks to Dr. L. Ridder).
According to RIP 1, the studied compounds II-IV with short R = Me, Et more selectively inhibit AChE they are not hazardous as delayed neurotoxicants. For all series of compounds, anti-NTE (log for NTE) and selectivity for NTE (log [ i(NTE)/ i(AChE)] = log RIP) increased with increasing hydrophobicity. This result agrees with experimental data [3,9,26,58,59,67] and a recent quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) study [68] on other OP molecules. [Pg.283]

The conclusion of Schumacher and Hpiland was not accepted by Richard et al. (305a) for reasons not mentioned in their paper. Using a method of quantitative structure-activity relationship determination, the above authors tried to evaluate the contribution of hydroxyl substituents to the toxicity of orellanine. The results appeared to be in total contradiction to the experimental data [e.g., calculated LD50 5 g/kg versus an experimentally determined LD50 of -4.9-12.5 mg/kg (276)] and led the authors to the conclusion that the proposal of the exact structure of orellanine may be questioned. It must be mentioned, however, that neither paraquat nor diquat were taken into account in the calculations. Three years later, more substantial arguments were made by Richard et al. 305b) as the result of their studies of the electrochemical behavior of orellanine which was shown to be different from diquat and paraquat. [Pg.265]

Abstract A thorough antimicrobial review of an increasing number of reports reveals a broad spectrum of research activity in the development practices that are used to treat a variety of diseases. The quantitative relationship between chemical structure and biological activity has received considerable attention in recent years because it allows one to predict theoretically bioactivity without an inordinate amount of experimental time and effort. In this chapter we collect and discuss critically published results concerning the QSAR research on antimicrobial compounds. Finally, we present an updated perspective about the future trends in this area. [Pg.1344]


See other pages where Quantitative structure-activity relationships experimental results is mentioned: [Pg.446]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.434]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.419]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.1515]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.931]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.1330]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.202]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.204 ]




SEARCH



QUANTITATIVE RELATIONSHIPS

Quantitation Results

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships

Quantitative result

Quantitative structur-activity relationships

Quantitative structure-activity

© 2024 chempedia.info