Quantitative methods defined

The method limit of quantitation and limit of detection must be determined as well as the limit of linearity. The limit of quantitation is defined as the level at which the measurement is quantitatively meaningful the limit of detection is the level at which the measurement is larger than the uncertainty and the limit of linearity is the upper level of the measurement rehabihty (39). These limits are determined by plotting concentration vs response. 

Remember also to take advantage of the team s individual, anecdotal experience with your company s management systems. Defining your company s management systems approach will be greatly enhanced by drawing on expert judgment as well as quantitative methods. 

The performance of a chemical plant depends upon an enormously high number of design and operating variables. This great number of process variables makes it impossible to find optimal conditions within the region of safe operation if no quantitative relationships (defined in terms of mathematics) between performance indices and process variables are known. In general, optima are complex functions of process variables, and therefore quantification of experimental ressults is needed. The methods for scale-up that were conventionally used at the time of Perkin chemistry resulted in successful commercialization of many laboratory recipes. This evolutionary, step-by-step method of scale-up is illustrated in Fig. 5.3-1 (after Moulijn et al. 2001). 

Methods and analytical results are often classified loosely as quantitative, semi-quantitative or qualitative (screening). These categories do not have well-defined or universally accepted boundaries. Since comparison of residue concentrations with legal limits requires exact quantitative results, the validation of quantitative methods is discussed here. 

Before performing a validation method for a certain application, the scope of the method and its validation criteria should be defined first. The parameters to be investigated include compounds, matrices, types of formation, qualitative or quantitative method, detection or quantitation limit, linear range, precision and accuracy, types of equipment that will be used, and the location of the system. These steps of the validation method are illustrated in Fig. 1, which has been modified from Ref. [11],... 

The most significant advantage of these more quantitative methods is that, in a binary system, only one sample is needed to determine the position of both phase boimdaries in a two-phase field. Further, if the alloy lies in the two-phase field over a wide range of temperatures, it is feasible that only one alloy need be used to fix the phase boundaries over this range of temperature. In a ternary system the analogous position is found with three-phase fields and, as these also define the limiting tie-lines of the three sets of two-phase fields, substantial information can be gained from the accurate determination of only one alloy. More recently transmission electron microscopy (TEM) has been used which is particularly valuable when microstructures are very fine as, for example, found in yTiAl alloys (Chen et al. 1994). 

Limit of quantitation cannot be defined for a semi-quantitative method (precision of double determinations is below 15% down to the non-specific binding and between-day precision of the negative serum controls (about 4 % B/T) is below 10 %... 

The phenolic functions are deprotected under rather drastic conditions, by analogy with methods defined previously for the cleavage of aryl methyl ethers.14 Treatment of dianisylphenanthroline 4 with pyridinium hydrochloride at 210°C affords 2,9-di(p-phenol)-l,10-phenanthroline 5 quantitatively (Scheme 9.4). 

Dr Coward was a mathematician with a knowledge of, and a liking for, statistical methods, and was therefore ideally suited for the work of defining such quantitative methods as were... 

The United States Pharmacopoeia (U.S.P.) [5] in a chapter on validation of compendial methods, defines analytical performance parameters (accuracy, precision, specificity, limit of detection, limit of quantitation, linearity and range, ruggedness, and robustness) that are to be used for validating analytical methods. A proposed United States Pharmacopeia (U.S.P.) general chapter on near-infrared spectrophotometry [6] addresses the suitability of instrumentation for use in a particular method through a discussion of operational qualifications and performance verifications. 

Solvent polarity is very difficult to define, but essentially refers to the solvation power of a solvent. Quantitative determination of solvent polarity is equally difficult, and quantitative methods rely on physical properties such as dielectric constant, dipole moment, and refractive index. It is not possible to determine the solvent polarity by measuring an individual solvent property due to the complexity of solute-solvent interactions and for this reason empirical scales of solvent polarity, based on chemical properties, are most widely used. The principal properties used to estimate solvent polarity are summarized in Table 2 and the most important of these methods are embellished below. 

Validation is the process of measuring the performance of a previously developed quantitative method. The characteristics measured to assess performance are defined and explained in detail later in this chapter. Typically, for a quantitative method the characteristics of specificity, accuracy, precision, and linearity are measured. The range of the method can be defined, or verified, by the region where the aforementioned characteristics are acceptable. Although their determination is more appropriately a development task, the characteristics of robustness, limit of detection, and limit of quantitation can also be verified during validation. 

In the quantitative method a catalyst was chosen, in this case CAT 4, and then the reaction conditions defined in order to predict the conversion with the model using equation [2], The defined reaction conditions for the quantitative testing of CAT 4 were the following gas flow 7cm min, [NO] = 714 ppm, [CsHg] 400 mol/mol NO. The results after 20 minutes in reaction are presented in Table 5. 

Quantitative methods are assays where the response signal has a continuous relationship with the quantity or activity of the analyte. These responses can therefore be described by a mathematical function. Inclusion of reference standards at discrete concentrations allows the quantification of sample responses by interpolation. A well-defined reference standard may or may not be available, or may not be representative of its content or activity, so quantification may not be absolute. To that end, three types of quantitative methods have been defined. 

As previously described, most biomarker assays are relative quantitative methods and not absolute (sometimes called definitive) quantitative methods. These differences are solely related to how well defined the calibration standard material is, and how well it is characterized or represents the endogenous analyte to be measured. 

---