Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Quadratic relaxation function

Other choices are possible for the relaxation function r. For these choices, expressions similar to Eq. (19) may be derived. Although it is awkward to deal with the absolute value in Eq. (14), a parabolic form meeting the principal requirements is more readily expressed in Fourier space. A simple quadratic (Willson, 1973) and its generalization to other powers have been used by Blass and Halsey (1981) ... [Pg.107]

A method called PARSE (Probability Assessment via Relaxation rates of a Structural Ensemble) is described for determination of ensembles of structures from NMR data. The problem is approached in two separate steps (1) generation of a pool of potential conformers, and (2) determination of the conformers probabilities which best account for the experimental data. The probabilities are calculated by a global constrained optimization of a quadratic objective function measuring the agreement between observed NMR parameters and those calculated for the ensemble. The performance of the method is tested on synthetic data sets simulated for various structural ensembles of the complementary dinucleotide d(CA) d(TG). [Pg.181]

The subscripts have the same meaning as in (12.29), (12.30). Indeed, (12.29), (12.30) show that in the parabolic free energy function, the static free energy is the linear term with respect to Aq, while the relaxation free energy is the quadratic term. Thus,. A/l[A) and /L4[fxc are, respectively, the static and the relaxation free energies to insert a unit charge into the reactant state. [Pg.435]

Sikorsky and Romiszowski [172,173] have recently presented a dynamic MC study of a three-arm star chain on a simple cubic lattice. The quadratic displacement of single beads was analyzed in this investigation. It essentially agrees with the predictions of the Rouse theory [21], with an initial t scale, followed by a broad crossover and a subsequent t dependence. The center of masses displacement yields the self-diffusion coefficient, compatible with the Rouse behavior, Eqs. (27) and (36). The time-correlation function of the end-to-end vector follows the expected dependence with chain length in the EV regime without HI consistent with the simulation model, i.e., the relaxation time is proportional to l i+2v The same scaling law is obtained for the correlation of the angle formed by two arms. Therefore, the model seems to reproduce adequately the main features for the dynamics of star chains, as expected from the Rouse theory. A sim-... [Pg.94]

A consistent study of the linear and lowest nonlinear (quadratic) susceptibilities of a superparamagnetic system subjected to a constant (bias) field is presented. The particles forming the assembly are assumed to be uniaxial and identical. The method of study is mainly the numerical solution (which may be carried out with any given accuracy) of the Fokker-Planck equation for the orientational distribution function of the particle magnetic moment. Besides that, a simple heuristic expression for the quadratic response based on the effective relaxation... [Pg.533]

This Rouse stress relaxation time is half of the end-to-end vector correlation time because stress relaxation is determined from a quadratic function of the amplitudes of normal modes (see Problem 8.36). [Pg.312]

Figure 4. Static hypermagnetizability anisotropy. Atj(O), computed with the d-aug-cc-pV5Z basis set (Neon) and d-aug-cc-pVQZ basis set (Argon). Orbital-relaxed results obtained with a finite field approach from analytically evaluated magnetizabilities are compared to those obtained from orbital-unrelaxed quadratic and cubic response functions... Figure 4. Static hypermagnetizability anisotropy. Atj(O), computed with the d-aug-cc-pV5Z basis set (Neon) and d-aug-cc-pVQZ basis set (Argon). Orbital-relaxed results obtained with a finite field approach from analytically evaluated magnetizabilities are compared to those obtained from orbital-unrelaxed quadratic and cubic response functions...
Given the apparent arbitrariness of the assumptions in a purely continuum-mechanics-based theory and the desire to obtain results that apply to at least some real fluids, there has been a historical tendency to either relax the Newtonian fluid assumptions one at a time (for example, to seek a constitutive equation that allows quadratic as well as linear dependence on strain rate, but to retain the other assumptions) or to make assumptions of such generality that they must apply to some real materials (for example, we might suppose that stress is a functional over past times of the strain rate, but without specifying any particular form). The former approach tends to produce very specific and reasonable-appearing constitutive models that, unfortunately, do not appear to correspond to any real fluids. The best-known example is the so-called Stokesian fluid. If it is assumed that the stress is a nonlinear function of the strain rate E, but otherwise satisfies the Newtonian fluid assumptions of isotropy and dependence on E only at the same point and at the same moment in time, it can be shown (see, e.g., Leigh29) that the most general form allowed for the constitutive model is... [Pg.60]

As we have mentioned earlier, we are also presenting the results of the size-extensive, size-consistent and invariant under restricted orbital rotations SS-MRCEPA methods developed from manifestly spin-free full-blown SS-MRCC method. We will display the values for both relaxed and frozen versions. In our prehminary applications of the SS-MRCEPA(l) method in this article as applied to model spaces with open-shell functions, we have not included the quadratic terms of the cluster operators. For the test case involving the closed-shell model functions only, we have included the quadratic operators. A comprehensive account considering the quadratic terms with the open-shell model functions also will be communicated in due course. [Pg.612]

It is often assumed that the correlation corrections to the SCF atomic and molecular energies, which are an order of magnitude lower than the relaxation energies, approximately cancel out in Eqn (2). However, as we shall see, this is not true for the relaxation corrections. If one uses, for the terms in brackets, quadratic functions of the charge increment on the bonded atom similar to the fits shown in Fig. 4, one obtains, for the relaxed and Koopmans ionization-energy shifts ... [Pg.60]

From these measurements, the ratio K/r) can also be determined independently. Fig. 4.7 shows an example of measured relaxation time as a function of sample thickness in the case of strong anchoring of 5CB on Nylon. The circles are the measured data, the solid line is the best fit to (4.22) and the dashed line is the best, purely quadratic, fit without the linear correction due to finite anchoring. As can be seen from Fig. 4.7, the method is sensitive enough to... [Pg.211]


See other pages where Quadratic relaxation function is mentioned: [Pg.364]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.618]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.630]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.1086]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.1028]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.101]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.107 ]




SEARCH



Quadratic

Quadratic functions

© 2024 chempedia.info