Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Pyrite freshwater sediments

Iron sulphides are ubiquitous in marine and freshwater sediments. They are usually present either as pyrite or as monosulphides, which can be liberated by hydrochloric acid. These acid volatile sulphides give rise to an intense black colour that is characteristic of anoxic sediments. They play an important role in recent diagenetic processes in sediments and the ratio of pyrite to acid volatile sulphides has been used as an historical indicator to determine whether sediments were formed in marine or freshwater conditions. They can be present over a wide range of... [Pg.346]

Pyrite is formed by two mechanisms in freshwater sediments. Fram-boidal pyrite results from reaction of iron monosulfides with S° (15), a slow reaction leading to gradual conversion of iron monosulfides to pyrite. In contrast, single crystals of pyrite are formed rapidly through reaction of Fe2+ and poly sulfides (161). Framboidal pyrite has been reported in lake sediments (37, 189), where it appears to form in microenvironments of plant or animal skeletons (cf. 35, 36). Rapid formation of pyrite has been observed in short-term measurements of sulfate reduction with SO/-. Up to 90% of reduced has been observed in pyrite after incubations of 1-24 h (72, 79, 98). A large fraction of inorganic S in the form of pyrite in surface sediments also has been interpreted to indicate rapid formation (112, 190). As discussed later, there is little evidence for extensive conversion of monosulfides to pyrite. [Pg.343]

Fig. 4.14 Plot of weight percent organic carbon vs. weight percent pyrite sulfur for normal-marine modern sediments. Each plotted point represents the average value of samples in a given core, taken at a sediment depth where contents of organic carbon and pyrite have attained quasi-steady-state values, i.e. where early diagenesis of carbon and sulfur is (essentially) complete. The dashed lines enclose data from a variety of other studies (after Berner and Raiswell 1983). Sediments deposited under anoxic (euxinic) conditions would plot above the trend line, freshwater sediments significantly below. Fig. 4.14 Plot of weight percent organic carbon vs. weight percent pyrite sulfur for normal-marine modern sediments. Each plotted point represents the average value of samples in a given core, taken at a sediment depth where contents of organic carbon and pyrite have attained quasi-steady-state values, i.e. where early diagenesis of carbon and sulfur is (essentially) complete. The dashed lines enclose data from a variety of other studies (after Berner and Raiswell 1983). Sediments deposited under anoxic (euxinic) conditions would plot above the trend line, freshwater sediments significantly below.
Respiratory sulphate reduction ideally takes place when all other electron acceptors are exhausted, but significant overlap may occur between the zones of microbial Fe(III) reduction and sulphate reduction due to kinetic constraints, as discussed before. Sulphate concentrations typically decrease to zero within the upper sediment layer (Fig. 1). In freshwater sediments, reduced S formed mainly by reduction of pore-water sulphate, is predominantly present as inorganic S in the form of AVS. Although pyrite is the most stable sulphide mineral, its formation in permanently submerged freshwater sediments is subject to controversy (Rickard et al., 1995). Because, contrary to marine sediments (S-dominated), there is an excess of Fe liberation over HS production in freshwater sediments (Fe-dominated), FeC03 as well as FeS may control pore-water Fe concentrations in the anoxic sediment layer. [Pg.522]

Huerta-Diaz, M.A., Carignan, R., Tessier, A., 1993. Measurement of trace metals associated with acid volatile sulfides and pyrite in organic freshwater sediments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 27, 2367-2372. [Pg.531]

Freshwater sediments in Murray Brook, New Brunswick, Canada received gold between 1989-92 from a vat leach cyanida-tion process used to separate gold from ores. The gossan (oxidized pyrites) tailings pile in... [Pg.331]

Postma D (1982) Pyrite and siderite formation in brackish and freshwater swamp sediments. Amer J Sci 282 1151-1183... [Pg.407]

Diagenesis of Microbially Reduced Sulfur. Postdepositional transformations play an important role in controlling the extent of recycling of microbially reduced S. Pore water profiles from many freshwater systems clearly show that H2S is a short-lived intermediate in sulfate reduction which does not accumulate in sediments (14.16 41-431. However, the conventional paradigm for sulfur diagenesis, in which H2S is initially immobilized by iron monosulfides that later are diagenetically altered to pyrite and elemental S (e.g., 2Q)> does not apply to all freshwater systems. Instead, organic S and CRS (chromium reducible S, which is believed to represent pyrite + S° after preliminary acid distillation to remove AVS), are important initial endproducts of dissimilatoiy reduction. [Pg.88]

Total sulfur concentrations in freshwater lacustrine sediments described in these studies may reach about 1 % (8), but are generally less than 0.4%. Marine sediments in California generally have average total sulfur concentrations of less than 1%, but are usually greater than 0.6% (6). Values for pyritic sulfur of 0.31 to 1.98% are given for coastal and marine sediments of Long Island Sound (7). [Pg.192]


See other pages where Pyrite freshwater sediments is mentioned: [Pg.188]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.3810]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.3592]    [Pg.3592]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.114]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.342 ]




SEARCH



Freshwater

Freshwater sediments

Pyrit

Pyrite

Pyritization

© 2024 chempedia.info