Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Proust s law of definite

Dalton s Law of Multiple Proportions meant that two elements combine in simple whole number ratios. Dalton believed that compounds found in nature would be simple combinations. Hence, knowing that hydrogen combines with oxygen to give water, Dalton s formula for water would consist of 1 H and 1 O. Its formula would be HO using modern nomenclature. Both Proust s Law of Definite Proportions and Dalton s Law of Multiple Proportions are outcomes of an atomic view of nature. In 1808 Dalton published his table of relative atomic weights along with his ideas on atomism in A New System of Chemical Philosophy. [Pg.34]

Each element is characterized by the mass of its atoms. Atoms of the same element have the same mass, but atoms of different elements have different masses. Dalton realized that there must be some feature that distinguishes the atoms of one element from those of another. Because Proust s law of definite proportions showed that elements always combine in specific mass ratios, Dalton reasoned that the distinguishing feature between atoms of different elements must be mass. [Pg.40]

The second hypothesis suggests that, in order to form a certain compound, we need not only atoms of the right kinds of elements, but specific numbers of these atoms as well. This idea is an extension of a law published in 1799 by Joseph Proust, a French chemist. Proust s law of definite proportions states that different samples of the same compound always contain its constituent elements in the same proportion by mass. Thus, if we were to analyze samples of carbon dioxide gas obtained from different sources, we would find in each sample the same ratio by mass of carbon to oxygen. It stands to reason, then, that if the ratio of the masses of different elements in a given compound is fixed, the ratio of the atoms of these elements in the compound also must be constant. [Pg.38]

Lucretius poem suggests that the Law of Conservation of Matter has been assumed for at least two millennia. It was certainly a fundamental scientific assumption during the scientific revolution. However, it was Lavoisier who propounded the view that, unless all material mass could be accounted for in a chemical reaction, one could not even try to understand it. Critical, too, were Richter s establishment of tables of equivalents and his concept of stoichiometry and Proust s law of definite composition, that successfully survived his debate with Berthollet. Dalton s notebook entry on September 6, 1803 (his thirty-seventh birthday) includes the first symbolic drawings and relative weights of his atoms. ... [Pg.369]

When the elements combine in a chemical reaction, they do so in small, whole-number ratios. This final point is simply a restatement of Proust s law of definite proportions. [Pg.48]

The existence of isotopes (atoms of the same element that differ in atomic mass) implies that Proust s law of definite proportions, which states that different saintle of the same compound always contain elements in the same proportion by mass, is in reality only an approximation. Two samples of carbon dioxide (CO2) would not have exactly the same mass ratio of carbon to oxygen if one of the samples were richer in carbon-13. [Pg.16]

Dalton s and Avogadro s theories became cornerstones of modem science. They also gave simple explanations of the constant compositions of chemical compounds and to Proust s law of definite proportions. [Pg.39]

Proks Ivo (1926-) Czecho-Slovak chem.., expert in historical thermodynamics, inventor of periodic thermal analysis Proust Louis Joseph (1754-1826) Fr. chem., established experimentally (Proust s) Law of definite portions, discovered sugar to exist in some vegetables... [Pg.466]

The laws of definite and multiple proportions are also associated with Dalton, for they can be explained by his atomic hypothesis. The law of definite proportions or of constant composition had previously been proposed in the work of Jeremias Richter and Joseph-Louis Proust. The law of multiple proportions came to be regarded as an empirical law quite independent of its relation to the atomic hypothesis or perhaps as an empirical law that inspired the atomic hypothesis however, Roscoe and Harden have shown that in Dalton s mind it was a testable prediction which followed from the atomic hypothesis 4). [Pg.8]

In 1808, the French chemist Joseph Gay-Lussac (1778—1850) reported thai when gaseous elements react, their volumes are in a ratio of small whole numbers. This is similar to what Proust described in his law of definite proportions except that Gay-Lussac was focusing on volume, not mass. Gay-Lussac s experiments showed that 2 liters of hydrogen completely reacts with 1 liter of oxygen (no more and no less) to form 2 liters of water vapor ... [Pg.83]

In 1799 Joseph Proust (1754-1826), a French chemist, observed that specific compounds always contained the same elements in the same ratio by mass. This came to be known as the law of definite proportions. The law of definite proportions provided a means for determining relative weights for numerous atoms and verified John Dalton s theory that elements are made up of atoms. Dalton (1766-1844) was an English teacher, chemist, and physicist. He used modern scientific methodology to develop long-lasting atomic theories. [Pg.2]

After 1800 chemistry was dominated by scientists who, following Lavoisier s lead, performed careful weighing experiments to study the course of chemical reactions and to determine the composition of various chemical compounds. One of these chemists, a Frenchman, Joseph Proust (1754-1826), showed that a given compound always contains exactly the same proportion of elements by mass. For example, Proust found that the substance copper carbonate is always 5.3 parts copper to 4 parts oxygen to 1 part carbon (by mass). The principle of the constant composition of compounds, originally called Proust s law, is now known as the law of definite proportion. [Pg.16]

The law of definite proportions was a crucial step in the development of modern chemistry, and by 1808, Proust s conclusions had become widely accepted. We now recognize that this law is not strictly true in all cases. Although all gaseous compounds obey Proust s law, certain solids exist with a small range of compositions and are called nonstoichiometric compounds. An example is wiistite, which has the nominal chemical formula FeO (with 77.73% iron by mass), but the composition of which, in fact, ranges continuously from Feo.950 (with 76.8% iron) down to Fco.siO (74.8% iron), depending on the method of preparation. Such compounds are called berthollides, in honor of Berthollet. We now know, on the atomic level, why they are nonstoichiometric (see the discussion in Section 21.6). [Pg.10]

John Dalton (1766-1844), an English schoolteacher and chemist, studied the results of experiments by Lavoisier, Proust, and many other scientists. He realized that an atomic theory of matter must explain the experimental evidence. For example, if matter were composed of indivisible atoms, then a chemical reaction would only rearrange those atoms, and no atoms would form or disappear. This idea would explain the law of conservation of mass. Also, if each element consisted of atoms of a specific type and mass, then a compoimd would always consist of a certain combination of atoms that never varied for that compound. Thus, Dalton s theory explained the law of definite proportions, as well. Dalton proposed his atomic theory of matter in 1803. Although his theory has been modified slightly to accommodate new discoveries, Dalton s theory was so insightful that it has remained essentially intact up to the present time. [Pg.54]

The law of definite proportions says that a substance always contains the same proportions of each element of which it s composed. For example, a molecule of water (H2O) always contains two hydrogen atoms for every oxygen atom. This is commonly understood among modern chemists, but it was an important step in working toward a microscopic understanding of the composition of matter. The first to make such claims, in the early 1800s, was the French chemist Joseph Proust. It was a controversial idea at that time, and other chemists believed that elements could be combined in any proportion. [Pg.10]

After many experiments in which he perfected his analytical techniques, Proust became convinced that each chemical compound has a fixed and invariable composition by weight that is, each compound has a formula. Whereas Berthollet had seen a blurred average (similar to the infamous statistic that the average family has 2.6 children), Proust found that his chemical children could not be divided into tenths. The observation, eventually known as the law of definite proportions, is best stated in Proust s own words ... [Pg.176]

Dalton s atomic theory and Wollaston s experiments (see p. 701) were criticised by Berthollet and he maintained his theory of indefinite proportions in certain cases. Ladenburg pointed out that the work of Richter, Dalton s atomic theory, Gay-Lussac s law of gaseous volumes, andthe work of Berzelius on combining proportions, had by then reinforced Proust s arguments, and nearly all chemists had returned to the view (held, for example, by Bergman) that chemical compounds were of definite composition. Most chemists decided in favour of Proust about 1808. Unfortunately, in rejecting Berthol-let s law of indefinite proportions, they also put aside the correct law of mass action, which was not really incompatible with the law of constant proportions and the atomic theory. Chemists then were interested in other matters, Probably the adoption of Dalton s atomic theory was at least as important as Proust s researches in the neglect of Berthollet s theory of variable proportions. ... [Pg.763]

Institution in London. The aim of the institution is to publicize ways in which science can be used to improve the quality of life. French chemist Joseph-Louis Proust articulates Proust s law the elements in a compound always combine in definite proportions by mass. [Pg.193]


See other pages where Proust s law of definite is mentioned: [Pg.175]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.1196]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.612]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.764]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.653]   


SEARCH



Law of definite

Proust

S , definition

© 2024 chempedia.info