Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Proton-transfer metallation

Mechanistically proton-transfer metallation is thought to proceed via a concerted arene-metallation and C-H bond cleaving process, which depends on the acidity of the C-H bond being cleaved (Scheme 6). The reaction shows complete inversion of reactivity relative to the electrophilic C-H activation pathway with electron deficient arenes reacting preferentially [20, 21]. [Pg.91]

Arsenate, a phosphate analog and enzyme inhibitor, binds between Ser-102 and Zn sites A and B. The guanidinium group of Arg-166 is within a H-bonding distance from the arsenate site. In the absence of any particular acid or base of the protein to facilitate the proton transfer, metals are apparently able to activate... [Pg.316]

Group I metals—sodium is the one usually employed—in liquid ammonia as the solvent convert alkynes to trans alkenes The reaction proceeds by a four step sequence in which electron transfer and proton transfer steps alternate... [Pg.384]

The mechanism by which the Birch reduction of benzene takes place (Figure 118) IS analogous to the mechanism for the metal-ammonia reduction of alkynes It involves a sequence of four steps m which steps 1 and 3 are single electron transfers from the metal and steps 2 and 4 are proton transfers from the alcohol... [Pg.439]

In Section 8, the material on solubility constants has been doubled to 550 entries. Sections on proton transfer reactions, including some at various temperatures, formation constants of metal complexes with organic and inorganic ligands, buffer solutions of all types, reference electrodes, indicators, and electrode potentials are retained with some revisions. The material on conductances has been revised and expanded, particularly in the table on limiting equivalent ionic conductances. [Pg.1284]

Scheme VIII has the form of Scheme II, so the relaxation time is given by Eq. (4-15)—appjirently. However, there is a difference between these two schemes in that L in Scheme VIII is also a participant in an acid-base equilibrium. The proton transfer is much more rapid than is the complex formation, so the acid-base system is considered to be at equilibrium throughout the complex formation. The experiment can be carried out by setting the total ligand concentration comparable to the total metal ion concentration, so that the solution is not buffered. As the base form L of the ligand undergoes coordination, the acid-base equilibrium shifts, thus changing the pH. This pH shift is detected by incorporating an acid-base indicator in the solution. Scheme VIII has the form of Scheme II, so the relaxation time is given by Eq. (4-15)—appjirently. However, there is a difference between these two schemes in that L in Scheme VIII is also a participant in an acid-base equilibrium. The proton transfer is much more rapid than is the complex formation, so the acid-base system is considered to be at equilibrium throughout the complex formation. The experiment can be carried out by setting the total ligand concentration comparable to the total metal ion concentration, so that the solution is not buffered. As the base form L of the ligand undergoes coordination, the acid-base equilibrium shifts, thus changing the pH. This pH shift is detected by incorporating an acid-base indicator in the solution.
Alcohols react with metal hydrides, MH, and with hydrogen halides, HX, but in very different ways. Proton transfer is involved in both reactions, but different molecules act as the proton donor and acceptor. [Pg.123]

The Dissociation of a Molecule into Ions. The Removal of Ions from a Metal Surface. The Removal of Ions from the Surface of an Ionic Crystal. The Solvation Energy of an Ion. Work Done against Electrostatic Forces. Molecules and Molecular Ions Containing One or More Protons. Proton Transfers. The Quantities D, L, Y, and J. Two Spherical Conductors. [Pg.21]

Solution of alkali metals in liquid ammonia, containing the so-called solvating electrons, may be used as an alternative homogeneous system to initiate polymerization by an electron transfer process. This system suffers, however, from complications resulting from proton transfer from ammonia leading to the formation of NH2- ions, which in turn initiate further polymerization.4... [Pg.155]

On the basis of the examples given above, it is reasonable to suggest that the underlying principles for optimization of the overall reaction rate with respect to the choice of metal ion are similar. That is, there are basically three states along the reaction pathway which determine the most suitable choice of metal ion. These are (1) the reactant state with bound metal and substrate before the proton transfer step, (2) the intermediately created free OH nucleophile and, (3) the subsequent transition state associated with... [Pg.205]

It may be instructive to again consider the energetics of a proton transfer reaction of the type involved in the first step of the examples above, in solution. Under the influence of a possible general base as the proton acceptor and a possible metal ion assisting as a catalyst we can write... [Pg.206]

This proton transfer reaction is not fast, and it is suggested that this may be a more complicated reaction than was anticipated, perhaps occurring by initial addition of OH or OR to the metal followed by H2O or ROH expulsion. In support of this is the isolation of a complex Os(CO)-(CNC6H4CH3)(PPh3)2(H)OR from an analogous reaction sequence. (This is the only reference yet to any osmium carbonyl-isocyanide chemistry.)... [Pg.62]

Hydrogen evolution at metal electrodes is one of the most important electrochemical processes. The mechanisms of the overall reaction depend on the nature of the electrode and solution. However, all of them involve the transfer of proton from a donor molecule in the solution to the adsorbed state on the electrode surface as the first step. The mechanism of the elementary act of proton transfer from the hydroxonium ion to the adsorbed state on the metal surface is discussed in this section. [Pg.658]

At least three components of the system change their state in the case of proton transfer reaction (1) electrons of the water molecule and the electrode providing the chemical bonding of the proton with a water molecule and the metal surface, (2) the proton itself, and (3) medium polarization. The characteristic times x, Xp, and x for... [Pg.658]

Paradoxically, all these significant recent contributions to the theory of the ORR, together with most recent experimental efforts to characterize the ORR at a fuel cell cathode catalyst, have not led at aU to a consensus on either the mechanism of the ORR at Pt catalysts in acid electrolytes or even on how to properly determine this mechanism with available experimental tools. To elucidate the present mismatch of central pieces in the ORR puzzle, one can start from the identification of the slow step in the ORR sequence. With the 02-to-HOOads-to-HOads route appearing from recent DFT calculations to be the likely mechanism for the ORR at a Pt metal catalyst surface in acid electrolyte, the first electron and proton transfer to dioxygen, according to the reaction... [Pg.11]

As might be expected, the results from both theory and experiment suggest that the solution is more than a simple spectator, and can participate in the surface physicochemical processes in a number of important ways [Cao et al., 2005]. It is well established from physical organic chemistry that the presence of a protic or polar solvent can act to stabilize charged intermediates and transition states. Most C—H, O—H, C—O, and C—C bond breaking processes that occur at the vapor/metal interface are carried out homolytically, whereas, in the presence of aqueous media, the hetero-lytic pathways tend to become more prevalent. Aqueous systems also present the opportunity for rapid proton transfer through the solution phase, which opens up other options in terms of reaction and diffusion. [Pg.95]

In addition to enhancing surface reactions, water can also facilitate surface transport processes. First-principles ab initio molecular dynamics simulations of the aqueous/ metal interface for Rh(l 11) [Vassilev et al., 2002] and PtRu(OOOl) alloy [Desai et al., 2003b] surfaces showed that the aqueous interface enhanced the apparent transport or diffusion of OH intermediates across the metal surface. Adsorbed OH and H2O molecules engage in fast proton transfer, such that OH appears to diffuse across the surface. The oxygen atoms, however, remained fixed at the same positions, and it is only the proton that transfers. Transport occurs via the symmetric reaction... [Pg.107]


See other pages where Proton-transfer metallation is mentioned: [Pg.91]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.413]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.963]    [Pg.791]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.107]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.91 ]




SEARCH



Metal proton transfer reactions

Metal transfer

Metal-peptides proton transfer reactions

Peptide-metal complexes proton-transfer reactions

Proton transfer rates between metal

Proton transfers, transition metal-complexes

Proton-coupled electron transfer metal complexes

Theory of Proton Transfer to Transition Metal Hydrides

© 2024 chempedia.info