Proton-free acceptor solvents

Phosphorus(V) chloride was found to behave as a base in hydrogen chloride as well as in the proton-free acceptor solvents iodine(I) chloride or arsenic(III) chloride ... 

The protons are dissociated away in contact with the water in the internal channels. Center. A covalent bonding of proton donor-acceptor molecules and a sufficiently dense stacking leads to a solvent free proton transport. Bottom. In the soggy sand electrolytes anions are absorbed at the surfaces of the insulating matrix (e.g., SiOJ. The respective cations (e.g., Li+) are free while far away from the matrix essentially associated in form of ions pairs if the solvent is a weak dielectric. 

Once the gas phase Hamiltonian is parametrized as a function of the inner-sphere reaetion coordinate(s), the free energy is calculated as a function of the proton coordinate(s), the scalar solvent coordinates, and the inner-sphere reaction coordinate(s). Note that this approaeh assumes that the optimized geometries of the VB states are not significantly affected by the solvent. For proton transfer reactions, the proton donor-acceptor distance may be treated as an additional solute reaction coordinate that ean be incorporated into the molecular mechanical terms describing the diagonal matrix elements hf- and, in some cases, the off-diagonal matrix elements (/io)y. If the inner-sphere reaction coordinate represents a slow mode, it is treated in the same way as the solvent coordinates. As discussed throughout the literature, however, often the inner-sphere reaction coordinate must be treated quantum mechanically [27, 28]. In this case, the inner-sphere reaction coordinate is treated in the same way as the proton coordinate(s), and the vibrational wave functions depend explicitly on both the proton coordinate(s) and the inner-sphere reaction coordinate(s). 

In the simplest case, the R mode is characterized by a low frequency and is not dynamically coupled to the fluctuations of the solvent. The system is assumed to maintain an equilibrium distribution along the R coordinate. In this case, ve can exclude the R mode from the dynamical description and consider an equilibrium ensemble of PCET systems with fixed proton donor-acceptor distances. The electrons and transferring proton are assumed to be adiabatic with respect to the R coordinate and solvent coordinates within the reactant and product states. Thus, the reaction is described in terms of nonadiabatic transitions between two sets of intersecting free energy surfaces ( R, and ej, Zp, corresponding to... 

In all solvents, the fraction of free water was greater in both dilute solution and in neat water than it was in intermediate concentrations. Through the analysis of ternary mixtures, the amount of nonbonded water molecules was found to be negligibly small in proton-acceptor solvents. 

Since free protons cannot exist, acidic properties can only be shown when the solvent can act as a proton acceptor, i.e. as a base. Thus aqueous solutions of acids contain the hydroxonium ion,... 

If the nucleophilicity of the anion is decreased, then an increase of its stability proceeds the excessive olefine can compete with the anion as a donor for the carbenium ion, and therefore the formation of chain molecules can be induced. The increase of stability named above is made possible by specific interactions with the solvent as well as complex formations with a suitable acceptor 112). Especially suitable acceptors are Lewis acids. These acids have a double function during cationic polymerizations in an environment which is not entirely water-free. They react with the remaining water to build a complex acid, which due to its increased acidity can form the important first monomer cation by protonation of the monomer. The Lewis acids stabilize the strong nucleophilic anion OH by forming the complex anion (MtXn(OH))- so that the chain propagation dominates rather than the chain termination. 

In this account, we will focus on the transient analysis of these systems, which has strongly contributed to a deeper understanding of the diverse reaction modes (Patemo-Buchi, proton abstraction, cycloaddition). In general, aromatic ketones were selected as electron acceptors for reasons of suitable excitation and long wavelength absorption of the radical anion intermediates. Among them, fluorenone 3 is particularly well suited since the concentration, solvent, temperature, and cation radius dependence of the absorption spectra of pairs formed with metal cations are already known [29]. Hogen-Esch and Smid [30, 10] pointed out that a differentiation between CIP and SSIP is possible for fluorenone systems. On the other hand, FRI s and SSIP s cannot be differentiated simply by their UV/Vis absorption spectra, whereas for instance conductance measurements may be successful. However, the portion of free radical ions in fluorenyl salt solutions was shown to be less important [9, 31]... 

One can draw a useful analogy between acid-base and oxidation-reduction reactions. Both involve the transfer of a species from a source, the donor, to a sink, the acceptor. The source and sink nomenclature implies that the tendency of the proton (in the case of acids) or of the electron (for reducing agents) to undergo transfer is proportional to the fall in free energy. From the relation AG° = RTIn Ka. you can see that the acid dissociation constant is a measure of the fall in free energy of the proton when it is transferred from a donor HA to the solvent H2O, which represents the reference (zero) free energy level of the proton in aqueous solution. 

Protophillic H-bond donor solvents solvents such as amides, amines or and other compounds with at least one N—II bond, which may be shared or donated. These solvents also have a highly basic character in the Bronsted sense i.e., they have a likelihood of accepting a free proton or a proton from a proton donor molecule (protophillic). These solvents also show high electron donor and acceptor properties (basic and acidic in the Lewis sense). 

---