Promoters chemisorption effects

There is a very rich literature and a comprehensive book6 on the role of promoters in heterogeneous catalysis. The vast majority of studies refers to the adsorption of promoters and to the effect of promoters on the chemisorptive state of coadsorbed species on well characterized single crystal surfaces. A... 

Can one further enhance the performance of this classically promoted Rh catalyst by using electrochemical promotion The promoted Rh catalyst, is, after all, already deposited on YSZ and one can directly examine what additional effect may have the application of an external voltage UWR ( 1 V) and the concomitant supply (+1 V) or removal (-1 V) of O2 to or from the promoted Rh surface. The result is shown in Fig. 2.3 with the curves labeled electrochemical promotion of a promoted catalyst . It is clear that positive potentials, i.e. supply of O2 to the catalyst surface, further enhances its performance. The light-off temperature is further decreased and the selectivity is further enhanced. Why This we will see in subsequent chapters when we examine the effect of catalyst potential UWR on the chemisorptive bond strength of various adsorbates, such as NO, N, CO and O. But the fact is that positive potentials (+1V) can further significantly enhance the performance of an already promoted catalyst. So one can electrochemically promote an already classically promoted catalyst. 

The key of the promotional action is the effect of electropositive and electronegative promoters on the chemisorptive bond of the reactants, intermediates and, sometimes, products of catalytic reactions. Despite the polymorphic and frequently complex nature of this effect, there are two simple rules always obeyed which can guide us in the phenomenological survey which follows in this chapter. 

For alkali modified noble and sp-metals (e.g. Cu, Al, Ag and Au), where the CO adsorption bond is rather weak, due to negligible backdonation of electronic density from the metal, the presence of an alkali metal has a weaker effect on CO adsorption. A promotional effect in CO adsorption (increase in the initial sticking coefficient and strengthening of the chemisorptive CO bond) has been observed for K- or Cs-modified Cu surfaces as well as for the CO-K(or Na)/Al(100) system.6,43 In the latter system dissociative adsorption of CO is induced in the presence of alkali species.43... 

The effect of alkali additives on N2 chemisorption has important implications for ammonia synthesis on iron, where alkali promoters (in the form of K or K20) are used in order to increase the activity of the iron catalyst. 

In section 2.5 we have examined the effect of promoters and poisons on the chemisorption of some key reactants on catalyst surfaces.We saw that despite the individual geometric and electronic complexities of each system there are some simple rules, presented at the beginning of section 2.5 which are always obeyed. These rules enable us to make some predictions on the effect of electropositive or electronegative promoters on the coverage of catalytic reactants during a catalytic reaction. 

It is obvious that one can use the basic ideas concerning the effect of alkali promoters on hydrogen and CO chemisorption (section 2.5.1) to explain their effect on the catalytic activity and selectivity of the CO hydrogenation reaction. For typical methanation catalysts, such as Ni, where the selectivity to CH4 can be as high as 95% or higher (at 500 to 550 K), the modification of the catalyst by alkali metals increases the rate of heavier hydrocarbon production and decreases the rate of methane formation.128 Promotion in this way makes the alkali promoted nickel surface to behave like an unpromoted iron surface for this catalytic action. The same behavior has been observed in model studies of the methanation reaction on Ni single crystals.129... 

As already noted the strength of chemisorptive bonds can be varied in situ via electrochemical promotion. This is the essence of the NEMCA effect. Following initial studies of oxygen chemisorption on Ag at atmospheric pressure, using isothermal titration, which showed that negative potentials causes up to a six-fold decrease in the rate of 02 desorption,11 temperature programmed desorption (TPD) was first used to investigate NEMCA.29... 

The effects of precious metals on ln/H-ZSM-5 was found not only to simply catalyze NO oxidation but also to enhance NOx chemisorption. It is noted that NO conversion on the lr/ln/H-ZSM-5 exceeded NO2 conversion in NO2-CH4-O2 reaction on in/H-ZSM-5, when the concentration of NOx was decreased [14]. This study shows the catalytic activities of ln/H-ZSM-5 promoted by precious metals for the removal of low concentration NOx and the promotive effects of the precious metal will be discussed. 

The last explanation for methanol formation, which was proposed by Ponec et al., 26), seems to be well supported by experimental and theoretical results. They established a correlation between the gfiethanol activity and the concentration of Pd , most probably Pd. Furthermore, Anikin et al. (27) performed ab initio calculations and found that a positive charge on the palladium effectively stabilizes formyl species. Metals in a non-zero valent state were also proposed by Klier et al. (28) on Cu/ZnO/Al O, by Apai (29) on Cu/Cr O and by Somorjai for rhodium catalyts (30). Recently results were obtained with different rhodium based catalysts which showed the metal was oxidized by an interaction with the support (Rh-0) (on Rh/Al 0 ) by EXAFS ( -32) and by FT-IR ( ) and on Rh/MgO by EXAFS ( ). The oxidation of the rhodium was promoted by the chemisorption of carbon monoxide (, ). ... 

Early in the nineties Ruiz et al. reported enhanced catalyst activities and increased selectivities to alkenes and higher hydrocarbons upon addition of V, Mg, and Ce oxides to Co-based F-T catalysts.These variations were attributed to electronic effects induced by the transition metal oxide. Similar results were obtained by Bessel et al. using a Cr promoter in Co/ZSM-5 catalysts.This group observed that the addition of Cr improved the catalyst activity, and shifted the selectivity from methane to higher, generally more olefinic, hydrocarbons. Based on H2 and CO chemisorption, as well as TPR and TPD results, they suggested that the promotion was caused by an interaction between the transition metal oxide and the cobalt oxide, which inhibits... 

The SMSI effect in Mn-promoted Ru/Ti02 catalysts was studied in more detail making use of the SSIMS technique, as well as with TEM, and selective chemisorption experiments. The SSIMS technique revealed the presence of TiO c forming two new surface sites, TiO -Ru and TiO-Mn. These species were found to be located at the immediate vicinity of the Ru nanoparticles. These new surface sites were considered to alter the electronic properties of the Ru metal surface and, as a consequence, the product selectivity. 

There is evidence of a promoting action of chromium on nickel catalysts for the reaction of hydrogenation of valeronitrile in our conditions. Introduction of chromium increased the initial specific activity and the selectivity. The promoting effect of chromium on activity could be correlated to the increase of the metallic surface. Another explanation could be that the Cr+ segregated at the surface of the catalyst may play the role of a Lewis acid center and may be responsible for a better chemisorption of valeronitrile on the catalysts, through nitrogen lone pair electrons or the n orbital of the CN bond. However, further examination of the results obtained (see Fig. 3)... 

---