Projected dynamics

From Eq. (70) we see that the time-dependent friction coefficient is given in terms of the force correlation function with projected dynamics. Instead, in MD simulations the time-dependent friction coefficient is computed using ordinary dynamics. 

Below is the brief of our proof. One key difference between dynamic SDR and static SDR is that a member might have the secret information for multiple positions in dynamic SDR. We project dynamic SDR onto static SDR by mapping the member ID space from one dimension into two dimensions, i.e., member m at ith position in the dynamic SDR is mapped to member (m, i) in static SDR. Thus, member m in the dynamic SDR can be viewed as coalition of members (m, i) for all i in static SDR. Furthermore, coalition among member mi,..., mj in the dynamic SDR can be viewed as coalition of members... 

Services offered The CSO offers a sufficiently broad scope of services for conducting the contracted research study in the shortest time possible. The services offered anticipate contract project demands and respond quickly to project dynamics. 

The time evolution of the reactive flux is given by projected dynamics [28] but in simulations we may replace projected dynamics by ordinary dynamics and insert absorbing states in the reactant and product regions to yield well defined plateau values. Such a procedure will be accurate provided there is a sufficient time scale separation between the relaxation time for reactive events and other microscopic relaxation times in the system. 

Dissipation appears through the second term in the right-hand side of (B.9). Since we are inferesfed in the projected dynamics (subdynamics [71,72]), one has to consider the reduced resolvent... 

Nagumey/ PROJECTED DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS [Pg.818]

Shacham, G. (1994). The Hachula Project - Dynamics of human interference with nature. Ecology and Environment, 4(1), 76-89. 

E. L. C05IPERE et ah. Homogeneous Reactor Project Dynamic Slurry Corrosion Studies Quarter Ending Jan. 31, 1957, USAEC Report CF-57-1-146, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1957. (p. 23)... 

A MODERN APPROACH TO LINEAR PROGRAMMING li ffimeyl PROJECTED DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS VARIATIONAL INEQUALITIES WITH APPLICATIONS... 

While the Bayesian relation of (93) is correct in principle, the high dimensionality of phase space makes its application difficult. In practice, its generalization for projected dynamics is more useful, particularly for testing reaction coordinate candidates [27]. For a given reaction coordinate q x), the probability P(TP ) is defined as an average of P(TP x) over the equilibrium ensemble constrained at q x) = q. 

Note that the time evolution of experimental observables zl (t) is governed by real dynamics which is determined according to Eq. 83 by the real propagator exp fit. The situation with the time evolution of the stochastic force Fn t) and the memory matrix Knk t) is much more complicated. According to Eq. 85, their evolution is governed by projected dynamics the propagator of which is given by exp iQLQt. ... 

On this basis the memory matrix can be expressed as an integral over the time-dependent autocorrelation function of matrix density fluctuations for projected dynamics ... 

The matrix density correlation function (0,r )5p (r,r)) for projected dynamics is approximated as a fc-space integral (for a detailed argument see Ref. [98]),... 

The intrachain dynamical structure factor for projected dynamics is defined by... 

Single-chain m (k,t) and collective k,t) dynamical structure factors for projected dynamics in Eq. 113 reflect the fact that local density fluctuations around the tagged chain are relaxed by the projected motions both of the tagged chain and the matrix chains. The projected nature of the dynamics is hidden in Eqs. 114 and 115 in the projected mean squared displacement, which qualitatively describes typical distances over which elementary density fluctuations become dispersed around the tagged chain during the time t. 

The essence of the first and second renormalization ansatzes to be described in the following refers to heuristic replacements of the mean squared segment displacement for projected dynamics, (R (())q. In the (once) renormalized Rouse model this unknown function is replaced by the result of the ordinary Rouse model, given in Eq. 58 [98]. In the... 

---