Process mapping results

The standard defines special processes as processes, the results of which cannot be fullp verified bp subsequent inspection and testing of the product and where, for example, processing deficiencies map become apparent onip after the product is in use. 

Data migration from one platform and environment to another was accomplished using the utilities supplied by the supplier. For most eases the tools were successful, however the inability to migrate the previously fitted baselines is a major flaw that prevents the ready replay of data. If data are auto-processed, equivalent results are obtained. A key for success is the teehnieal imderstanding of both environments so that parameters can be mapped between the two. 

The success of the simulation depends on your ability to describe the process in sufficient enough detail to produce realistic results. You can derive this information from a Process Map or Value Stream Map (Technique 46). Be sure to include key subprocesses, decision points, and queues (waiting lines). 

Heavy-atom method Relative phases calculated for a heavy atom in a location determined from a Patterson map are used to calculate an approximate electron-density map. Further portions of the molecular structure may be identified in this map and used to calculate better relative phases, and therefore a more realistic electron-density map results. Several cycles of this process may be necessary in order to determine the entire crystal structure. 

Coal combustion for heating, as well as steel and power production, has been extensive in the United States, particularly in the north central and northeast portions of the country. Release of sulfur and nitrogen oxides from this process has resulted in a well-characterized impact downwind from the power plants in the northeastern US in the form of acid deposition (Husar etal., 1991 Shaw, 1984). Maps of sulfate (sulfuric acid) deposition show high values in parts of Ohio, West Virginia, and Pennsylvania as well as further to the northeast, into the New England states and Canada (Eilers and Selle, 1991 Shaw, 1984). The impact of acid deposition on lakes and soils is regionally detectible (Driscoll et al, 2001 Herlihy et ai, 1993) and is... 

Mapping Results. After Aspen IPE has mapped and sized the equipment items, it is prudent to check the results, especially for major equipment items such as towers, compressors, and chemical reactors. These items are usually very expensive, and consequently, it is a good practice to estimate equipment sizes independently for comparison with the Aspen IPE results. To view the Aspen IPE results for an equipment item, double click on the item on the IPE Workbook window or on its icon in the Process Flow Diagram. For example, the following component specification form, which contains some of the sizing results, is obtained for the depropanizer tower. 

Figure 5. Example of a landslide hazard map that combines process-model results with an inventory map. Modified from Haneberg (2004).

Some maps were made to assess the development of landslides Map of landslide types (according to the mechanism of displacement), characterizing the distribution of slope processes in the Geyser valley (Fig. 5) Mapping was based on thematic interpretation of remote sensing data with subsequent certification of the field results. Slope processes mapping showed that landslides in study area can be separated (Fig. 5) ... 

Equation (6.3.8) provides the route to determining L t) from L (/) at least as discrete approximations. Thus, the complete growth rate L[/, t] is obtainable by this approach. The property of invariance enables the mapping of the measurement of particle size distribution at each instant into that at the initial time. The consistency with which the different calculations collapse into a single distribution provides a test of the efficacy of the process. The result shown in Fig. 6.3.4 does indicate that the method has considerable potential since the estimated initial distributions collapse to that assumed. 

---