Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Process geometric factors

When a battery produces current, the sites of current production are not uniformly distributed on the electrodes (45). The nonuniform current distribution lowers the expected performance from a battery system, and causes excessive heat evolution and low utilization of active materials. Two types of current distribution, primary and secondary, can be distinguished. The primary distribution is related to the current production based on the geometric surface area of the battery constmction. Secondary current distribution is related to current production sites inside the porous electrode itself. Most practical battery constmctions have nonuniform current distribution across the surface of the electrodes. This primary current distribution is governed by geometric factors such as height (or length) of the electrodes, the distance between the electrodes, the resistance of the anode and cathode stmctures by the resistance of the electrolyte and by the polarization resistance or hinderance of the electrode reaction processes. [Pg.514]

Tenet (iv). The influence of a barrier layer in opposition to the progress of reaction may be expected to rise as the quantity of product, and therefore the thickness of the interposed layer, is increased [35,37,38]. Thus, the characteristic kinetic behaviour of the overall process may be expected to include contributions from both geometric factors and the barrier effect, though in specific instances one or other of these may be dominant. [Pg.7]

Sections 2.1—2.3 give accounts of kinetic and mechanistic features of the three rate-limiting processes (i) diffusion at a surface or in a gas (including the nucleation step), (ii) reaction at an interface, and (iii) diffusion across a barrier phase, [(ii) and (iii) are growth processes.] In any particular reaction, the slowest of these processes will, at any particular instant, control the rate of product formation. (A kinetic analysis of rate measurements must also incorporate an allowance for the geometric factors.)... [Pg.253]

The terms (j) and (g) represent factors that account for the geometry of the diffusion process. In general, the equation for the diffusion coefficient can be written with a geometrical factor, y, included, so that it becomes... [Pg.235]

For moderately doped substrates, when the surface is free of oxide the change of potential is mostly dropped in the space charge layer and in the Helmholtz double layer. The reactions are very sensitive to geometric factors. The reaction that is kinetically limited by the processes in the space charge layer is sensitive to radius of curvature, while that limited by the processes in the Helmholtz layer is sensitive to the orientation of the surface. Depending on the relative effect of each layer the curvature effect versus anisotropic effect can vary. [Pg.197]

Here the role of the geometrical factors in chemisorption is especially vividly expressed. These factors have been analyzed in detail by A. A. Balandin and co-workers in their papers (see, for example, ref. 18) on the multiplet theory of catalysis, in which they show their prime importance in a number of cases of the catalytic process. The electronic mechanism of chemisorption does not at all exclude these factors, but just stresses their role it retains the geometrical schemes of the multiplet theory but gives them physical content. [Pg.207]

In principle pentadienyls can bond to transition elements in at least three basic ways, tj3, and tjs (Fig. 1). These can be further subdivided when geometrical factors are considered. If r 5 coordination could be converted to rj3 orr/1, one or two coordination sites could become available at the metal center, and perhaps coordinate substrate molecules in catalytic processes. Little is known about the ability of pentadienyl complexes to act as catalysts. Bis(pentadienyl)iron derivatives apparently show naked iron activity in the oligomerization of olefins (144), resembling that exhibited by naked nickel (13). The pentadienyl groups are displaced from acyclic ferrocenes by PF3 to give Fe(PF3)5 in a way reminiscent of the formation of Ni(PF3)4 from bis(allyl)nickel (144). [Pg.141]

The selectivity and deactivation processes in pore fractals such as the Sier-pinski gasket were simulated by Gavrilov and Sheintuch (1997) and Sheintuch (1999). Their studies investigated, e.g., the effect of the fractal pore structure on the selectivity of a system that incorporates two parallel reactions. Geometrical factors, which influence dynamic processes in a porous fractal solid media, were also investigated by Garza-Lopez and Kozak (1999). [Pg.174]

Compute the process-side heat-transfer coefficient. The correlations for inside (process-side) heat-transfer coefficient in an agitated tank are similar to those for heat transfer in pipe flow, except that the impeller Reynolds number and geometric factors associated with the tank and impeller are used and the coefficients and exponents are different. A typical correlation for the agitated heat-transfer Nusselt number (ANu = htT/k) of a jacketed tank is expressed as... [Pg.447]

Geometric factors play a role in the catalytic processes on clays. Smectites, for example, consist of regular, parallel sheets. The size and swelling properties of the interlayer space determine the size and shape of the molecules intercalating between the layers, which will have an effect on the selectivity of the reaction. [Pg.65]

The preceding paragraphs have not considered the possible influences of geometric factors like impeller height, liquid depth, etc. As a starting point it seems reasonable to use the widely adopted square batch, with liquid height equal to vessel diameter, and to set the impeller one impeller-diameter above the vessel bottom. Later, one should check experimentally to see if any of these factors is influencing the process performance. [Pg.195]

The above description of the excited states in terms of excitation amplitudes is frame and basis set dependent. A more convenient description is in terms of state multipoles. It can be generalised to excited states of different orbital angular momentum and provides more physical insight into the dynamics of the excitation process and the subsequent nature of the excited ensemble. The angular distribution and polarisation of the emitted photons are closely related to the multipole parameters (Blum, 1981). The representation in terms of state multipoles exploits the inherent symmetry of the excited state, leads to simple transformations under coordinate rotations, and allows for easy separation of the dynamical and geometric factors associated with the radiation decay. [Pg.207]

S(Av v) is the phototube sensitivity at the wavelength of the (v v) band, is the frequency of the same band and is a proportionality constant that includes parameters such as geometrical factors and the electronic transition moment (assumed to be constant). The term in brackets in eqn (2) represents the absorption process, while the summation represents the subsequent fluorescence pathways (assumed to occur only to the ground state) terminating in the various vibrational levels v. [Pg.134]

The importance of the geometrical factor in rigid systems was confirmed by Dauben and coworkers who also pointed out that in such systems the process is not controlled by thermodynamic considerations. It is not necessarily the most stable (= least substituted) carbanion which is formed ( electronic factor ). [Pg.752]


See other pages where Process geometric factors is mentioned: [Pg.383]    [Pg.529]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.439]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.682]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.578]    [Pg.814]    [Pg.529]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.816]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.557]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.434]    [Pg.435]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.610 ]




SEARCH



Factors process

Geometric factor

Geometrical factor

Processivity factor

© 2024 chempedia.info