Process control general checks

Written in-process control procedures should be followed. These procedures should describe the point of sampling, frequency of sampling, number of samples to be taken, specification to be checked and the limits of acceptability for each specification. 6.l0.6.2in addition, in-process control should include, but not limited to, the following general procedures —the produce fill or count should be checked at the... 

In general, the strategy for reducing risk could involve reducing the frequency of either the risk or the consequence of the potential accidents. The frequency of the risk could be reduced by having several layers of safety checks or controls (see Fig. 8.1). A process could have a slave and a master controller, followed by a set of alarms, and, finally, manual supervision. In such a design, an uncontrolled event would arise only if all the controls and checks failed. If the probability of such failure of each of the event is about 0.02 (i.e., 2%), then the probability of a hazard to occur would be equal to O.oi = 0.00000016. 

In instrumentation and control, triple modular redundancy is very important for fail safe operation. Fig. 1/6.1.2-1 shows the same. Here, each of the three elements are voted thrice in each stage to get the output. In network communications, especially for remote communication, there are a few other problems known as Two Army problem, Byzantine general problem, etc. The issues discussed so far basically belong to fault masking to get away with hardware fault. There is another term called dynamic recovery, in which case there shall be a special mechanism to detect hardware fault and isolate the faulty hardware and replace the same with a good one. This wiU be clear from an example. Say in a process control, there are two processors one working and the other standby. If there is another processor whose main function is to act a diagnostic processor to check health of other processors, when it finds fault with... 

Here we review some of the correlations of convective mass transfer. We will find that many reactors are controlled by mass transfer processes so this topic is essential in describing many chemical reactors. This discussion will necessarily be very brief and qualitative, and we win summarize material that most students have encountered in previous courses in mass transfer. Our goal is to write down some of the simple correlations so we can work examples. The assumptions in and validity of particular expressions should of course be checked if one is interested in serious estimations for particular reactor problems. We will only consider here the mass transfer correlations for gases because for liquids the correlations are more comphcated and cannot be easily generalized. 

In this section we analyze processes involving the second-order A + B —> 2P reaction. Such processes have been studied, among others, by Luyben andTyreus [10]. It has been noticed [11] that certain control structures lead to state multiplicity and instability. Here, we use dimensionless models to derive general feasibility and stability conditions. The reader is encouraged to check carefully the balance equations, writing them first in the dimensional form, and then deriving the dimensionless versions. To solve these equations, software such as Maple or the symbolic toolbox of Matlab can be used. 

Corrosion and its control mean the corrosion process and the measures taken to control or keep in check the corrosion process. Sometimes it is also referred to as corrosion, prevention and protection. Although the terms prevention and protection appear to be synonymous, prevention means measures taken to control corrosion to a limited extent while protection means extensive or more comprehensive measures taken to control the corrosion process. In more general terms preventive measures are knowledge-based while protection involves both known and unknown factors, such as natural disasters. 

The principles and concepts of TQM have been formalized into a quality management process, as illustrated in Figure 19-3. The traditional framework for managing quality in a healthcare laboratory has emphasized the establishment of quality laboratory processes (QLPs), QC, and quality assessment (QA). A QLP includes analytical processes and the general poHcies, practices, and procedures that define how all aspects of the work get done. QC emphasizes statistical control procedures but also includes nonstatistical check procedures, such as linearity checks, reagent and standard checks, and temperature monitors. QA, as currently applied, is primarily concerned with broader measures and monitors of laboratory performance, such as turnaround time, specimen identification, patient identification, and test utility. Quality assessment is the proper name for diese activities rather than quality assurance. Measuring performance does not by itself improve performance and often does not detect problems in time to prevent harmful effects. Quality... 

---