Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Probability density quantum mechanical

To extract infomiation from the wavefimction about properties other than the probability density, additional postulates are needed. All of these rely upon the mathematical concepts of operators, eigenvalues and eigenfiinctions. An extensive discussion of these important elements of the fomialism of quantum mechanics is precluded by space limitations. For fiirther details, the reader is referred to the reading list supplied at the end of this chapter. In quantum mechanics, the classical notions of position, momentum, energy etc are replaced by mathematical operators that act upon the wavefunction to provide infomiation about the system. The third postulate relates to certain properties of these operators ... [Pg.7]

I i i(q,01 in configuration space, e.g. as defined by the possible values of the position coordinates q. This motion is given by the time evolution of the wave fiinction i(q,t), defined as die projection ( q r(t)) of the time-dependent quantum state i i(t)) on configuration space. Since the quantum state is a complete description of the system, the wave packet defining the probability density can be viewed as the quantum mechanical counterpart of the classical distribution F(q- i t), p - P t)). The time dependence is obtained by solution of the time-dependent Schrodinger equation... [Pg.1057]

This formulation is not just a mathematical trick to form an antisymmetric vravefunction. Quantum mechanics specifies that an electron s location is not deterministic but rather consists of a probability density in this sense, it can he anywhere. This determinant mixes all of the possible orbitals of all of the electrons in the molecular system to form the wavefunction. [Pg.260]

At a physical level. Equation 35 represents a mixing of all of the possible electronic states of the molecule, all of which have some probability of being attained according to the laws of quantum mechanics. Full Cl is the most complete non-relativistic treatment of the molecular system possible, within the limitations imposed by the chosen basis set. It represents the possible quantum states of the system while modelling the electron density in accordance with the definition (and constraints) of the basis set in use. For this reason, it appears in the rightmost column of the following methods chart ... [Pg.266]

Suppose we wish to measure the position of a particle whose wave function is W(jc, i). The Bom interpretation of F(x, as the probability density for finding the associated particle at position x at time t implies that such a measurement will not yield a unique result. If we have a large number of particles, each of which is in state /) and we measure the position of each of these particles in separate experiments all at some time t, then we will obtain a multitude of different results. We may then calculate the average or mean value x) of these measurements. In quantum mechanics, average values of dynamical quantities are called expectation values. This name is somewhat misleading, because in an experimental measurement one does not expect to obtain the expectation value. [Pg.41]

Redress can be obtained by the electron localization function (ELF). It decomposes the electron density spatially into regions that correspond to the notion of electron pairs, and its results are compatible with the valence shell electron-pair repulsion theory. An electron has a certain electron density p, (x, y, z) at a site x, y, z this can be calculated with quantum mechanics. Take a small, spherical volume element AV around this site. The product nY(x, y, z) = p, (x, y, z)AV corresponds to the number of electrons in this volume element. For a given number of electrons the size of the sphere AV adapts itself to the electron density. For this given number of electrons one can calculate the probability w(x, y, z) of finding a second electron with the same spin within this very volume element. According to the Pauli principle this electron must belong to another electron pair. The electron localization function is defined with the aid of this probability ... [Pg.89]

Quantum mechanics allows the determination of the probability of finding an electron in an infinitesimal volume surrounding any particular point in space (x,j,z) that is, the probability density at this point. Since we can assign a probability density to any point in space, the probability density defines a scalar field, which is known as the probability density distribution. When the probability density distribution is multiplied by the total number of electrons in the molecule,... [Pg.269]

Potential fluid dynamics, molecular systems, modulus-phase formalism, quantum mechanics and, 265—266 Pragmatic models, Renner-Teller effect, triatomic molecules, 618-621 Probability densities, permutational symmetry, dynamic Jahn-Teller and geometric phase effects, 705-711 Projection operators, geometric phase theory, eigenvector evolution, 16-17 Projective Hilbert space, Berry s phase, 209-210... [Pg.94]

In quantum mechanics, the state of an atom or nucleus is described by a complex wave function i/r(ri, r2,..., t) such that xfnfr = ij/ 2 is the probability density of finding particles in volume elements d3rj centred on r, at time t. satisfies the Schrodinger equation... [Pg.408]

I function which carries maximum information about that system. Definition of the -function itself, depends on a probability aggregate or quantum-mechanical ensemble. The mechanical state of the systems of this ensemble cannot be defined more precisely than by stating the -function. It follows that the same -function and hence the same mechanical state must be assumed for all systems of the quantum-mechanical ensemble. A second major difference between classical and quantum states is that the -function that describes the quantum-mechanical ensemble is not a probability density, but a probability amplitude. By comparison the probability density for coordinates q is... [Pg.452]

Since the early days of quantum mechanics, the wave function theory has proven to be very successful in describing many different quantum processes and phenomena. However, in many problems of quantum chemistry and solid-state physics, where the dimensionality of the systems studied is relatively high, ab initio calculations of the structure of atoms, molecules, clusters, and crystals, and their interactions are very often prohibitive. Hence, alternative formulations based on the direct use of the probability density, gathered under what is generally known as the density matrix theory [1], were also developed since the very beginning of the new mechanics. The independent electron approximation or Thomas-Fermi model, and the Hartree and Hartree-Fock approaches are former statistical models developed in that direction [2]. These models can be considered direct predecessors of the more recent density functional theory (DFT) [3], whose principles were established by Hohenberg,... [Pg.105]

In the case of Model II, neither the state-specihc nor the total quantum-mechanical level densities are available. To determine the optimal value of the ZPE correction, therefore criterion (98) was applied, which yielded y = 0.6. The mapping results thus obtained (panels D and G) are seen to reproduce the quantum result almost quantitatively. It should be noted that this ZPE adjustment ensures that the adiabatic population probabilities remain within [0, 1] and at the same time also yields the best agreement with the quantum diabatic populations. [Pg.318]

To obtain a first impression of the nonadiabatic wave-packet dynamics of the three-mode two-state model. Fig. 34 shows the quantum-mechanical probability density P (cp, f) = ( (f) / ) (p)(cp ( / (f)) of the system, plotted as a function of time t and the isomerization coordinate cp. To clearly show the... [Pg.334]

Figure 34. Quantum-mechanical (left) and quasi-classical (right) probability densities of the... Figure 34. Quantum-mechanical (left) and quasi-classical (right) probability densities of the...
To study to what extent the mapping approach is able to reproduce the quantum results of Model 111, Eigs. 34 and 35 show the quasi-classical probability densities P (cp,f) for the two cases. The classical calculation for E = 0 is seen to accurately match the initial decay of the quantum-mechanical... [Pg.336]


See other pages where Probability density quantum mechanical is mentioned: [Pg.15]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.1717]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.1058]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.392]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.394]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.35 , Pg.36 , Pg.64 ]




SEARCH



Probability densities and quantum-mechanical analogy

Probability densities quantum-mechanical tunneling

Probability density

Probability quantum-mechanical

Quantum mechanics probabilities

Quantum probability

© 2024 chempedia.info