Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Potential magnesium

P.P. George, J.J. Newport, J.L. Nichols, A high-potential magnesium anode. Corrosion 12 (1956) 627t-633t. [Pg.633]

Practice has shown that in systems with high potential (magnesium) sacrificial anodes, the flow of polarizing current is mainly controlled by the number and dimensions of the anodes, while in the case of the application of low potential sacrificial anodes (zinc and aluminum), the type and state of the cathode (structure) is the controlling factor. This means that doubling of... [Pg.428]

In view of the ionisation energies the electrode potentials for lithium and beryllium might be expected to be higher than for sodium and magnesium. In fact... [Pg.134]

Figure 7-15 shows the time evolution of the temperature, total energy, and potential energy for a 300 ps simulation of the tetracycline repressor dimer in its induced (i.e., hgand-bound) form. Starting from the X-ray structure of the monomer in a complex with one molecule of tetracycline and a magnesium ion (protein database... [Pg.369]

Calculations of the interaction energy in very fine pores are based on one or other of the standard expressions for the pair-wise interaction between atoms, already dealt with in Chapter 1. Anderson and Horlock, for example, used the Kirkwood-Miiller formulation in their calculations for argon adsorbed in slit-shaped pores of active magnesium oxide. They found that maximum enhancement of potential occurred in a pore of width 4-4 A, where its numerical value was 3-2kcalmol , as compared with 1-12, 1-0 and 1-07 kcal mol for positions over a cation, an anion and the centre of a lattice ceil, respectively, on a freely exposed (100) surface of magnesium oxide. [Pg.207]

The pyrometaHurgical processes, ie, furnace-kettle refining, are based on (/) the higher oxidation potentials of the impurities such as antimony, arsenic, and tin, ia comparison to that of lead and (2) the formation of iasoluble iatermetaUic compounds by reaction of metallic reagents such as 2iac with the impurities, gold, silver and copper, and calcium and magnesium with bismuth (Fig. 12). [Pg.43]

Dissolved Minerals. The most significant source of minerals for sustainable recovery may be ocean waters which contain nearly all the known elements in some degree of solution. Production of dissolved minerals from seawater is limited to fresh water, magnesium, magnesium compounds (qv), salt, bromine, and heavy water, ie, deuterium oxide. Considerable development of techniques for recovery of copper, gold, and uranium by solution or bacterial methods has been carried out in several countries for appHcation onshore. These methods are expected to be fully transferable to the marine environment (5). The potential for extraction of dissolved materials from naturally enriched sources, such as hydrothermal vents, may be high. [Pg.288]

Further dechlorination may occur with the formation of substituted diphenyhnethanes. If enough aluminum metal is present, the Friedel-Crafts reactions involved may generate considerable heat and smoke and substantial amounts of hydrogen chloride, which reacts with more aluminum metal, rapidly forming AlCl. The addition of an epoxide inhibits the initiation of this reaction by consuming HCl. Alkali, alkaline-earth, magnesium, and zinc metals also present a potential reactivity hazard with chlorinated solvents such as methylene chloride. [Pg.519]

Potassium-sparing by diuretic agents, particularly spironolactone, enhances the effectiveness of other diuretics because the secondary hyperaldosteronism is blocked. This class of diuretics decreases magnesium excretion, eg, amiloride can decrease renal excretion of potassium up to 80%. The most important and dangerous adverse effect of all potassium-sparing diuretics is hyperkalemia, which can be potentially fatal the incidence is about 0.5% (50). Therefore, blood potassium concentrations should be monitored carehiUy. [Pg.208]

The cathodic protection of plain carbon and low-alloy steels can be achieved with galvanic anodes of zinc, aluminum or magnesium. For materials with relatively more positive protection potentials (e.g., stainless steels, copper, nickel or tin alloys), galvanic anodes of iron or of activated lead can be used. [Pg.180]

Figure 6-7 shows the effect of water conductivity on the rest potential of type AZ63, and M2 as well as of zinc and aluminum [23]. In cold waters with chlorides or sulfates, the polarization of magnesium anodes is low — even in the case of high current densities. This is demonstrated for 70°C with current-density vs. [Pg.192]

The quality control of galvanic anodes is reduced mainly to the analytical control of the chemical composition of the alloy, to the quality and coating of the support, to an adequate joint between support and anode material, as well as to restricting the weight and size of the anode. The standards in Refs. 6, 7, 22, 27, 31 refer to magnesium and zinc anodes. Corresponding specifications for aluminum anodes do not exist. In addition, the lowest values of the rest potentials are also given [16]. The analytical data represent the minimum requirements, which are usually exceeded. [Pg.203]

Anodes for boilers can be tested by such methods. Good-quality magnesium anodes have a mass loss rate per unit area < 30 g m d", corresponding to a current yield of >18% under galvanostatic anode loading of 50 /xA cm" in 10 M NaCl at 60°C. In 10 M NaCl at 60°C, the potential should not be more positive than t/jj = -0.9 V for the same polarization conditions [27],... [Pg.204]

Cathodic protection with magnesium anodes can be just as economical as impressed current anode assemblies for pipelines only a few kilometers in length and with protection current densities below 10 xA m" e.g., in isolated stretches of new pipeline in old networks and steel distribution or service pipes. In this case, several anodes would be connected to the pipeline in a group at test points. The distance from the pipeline is about 1 to 3 m. The measurement of the off potential... [Pg.278]


See other pages where Potential magnesium is mentioned: [Pg.32]    [Pg.873]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.873]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.810]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.443]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.394]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.422]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.2387]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.279]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.275 ]




SEARCH



Electrode potential magnesium

Magnesium corrosion potentials

Magnesium pair potential

Magnesium potential functions

Magnesium standard electrode potential

Magnesium, reduction potentials

Magnesium, standard reduction potentials

© 2024 chempedia.info