Polyolefin testing evaluation

Chlorinated polyether is formulated particularly for products requiring, good chemical resistance. Other materials exhibiting good chemical resistance include all of the fluorocarbon plastics, ethylpentenes, polyolefins, certain phenolics, and diallyl phtha-late compounds. Additives such as fillers, plasticizers, stabilizers, colorants, and type catalysts can decrease the chemical resistance of unfilled plastics. Certain chemicals in cosmetics will affect plastics, and tests are necessary in most cases with new formulations. Temperature condition is also very important to include in the evaluation. Careful tests must be made under actual use conditions in final selection studies. 

Becanse there are many factors involved in the dynamic mechanical compression of polyolefin foams, the Taguchi method was employed in a Perkin Elmer DM A7 dynamic mechanical analyser to establish a method to improve the measurement process. The signal-to-noise ratio was measured to determine how the variability could be improved. Control and noise factors were evaluated and levels chosen, with details being tabulated. Appendix A describes some of the factors. Tests were conducted on two closed cell foams. NA2006 foam is 48 kg/cu m LDPE and NEE3306 foam is 32 kg/cu m EVA. Different factors were shown to influence results for E and tan delta but an optimum combination is proposed for the simultaneous measurement of both properties. The results were less variable as frequency was increased. Small differences in the dynamic response of different materials should be measurable because of the low variability in the experimental results. 18 refs. 

In addition to the above-mentioned polymers, other addition polymers such as polyolefin, polystyrene, polyvinylethers, polychloral, polyisocyanides, polyacetylene, and polyethers were synthesized and evaluated as the precursors for the preparation of CSPs. Some of them were coated or chemically bonded to silica gel and tested for the chiral resolution of different racemic compounds. 

Evaluation of Experimental Organophosphorus Esters in Polyolefins. The compounds were tested in the following polyolefins as listed below, the results being shown in the Tables in parenthesis ... 

ASTM D 5397-99 Standard Test Method for Evaluation of Stress Crack Resistance of Polyolefin Geomembranes Using Notched Constant Tensile Load Test... 

Gray RL (1990) Accelerated Testing Method for Evaluating Polyolefin Stability. In Koemer RM (ed) (leosynthetic Testing for Waste Ckmtainment Applications ASTM special technical Publication 1081. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), West Conshohocken, pp 57-74... 

Asymmetric double cantilever beam and peel test experiments were completed by Eastwood et al. (Eastwood and Dadmun, 2002) to evaluate the ability of multiblock or blocky distributed chlorinated polyethylenes (bCPEs) to strengthen the PVC/POE interface compared to that of randomly distributed chlorinated polyethylene (rCPE). Additionally, the dependence of molecular weight and chlorine content of the bCPE (composition) will be evaluated to ascertain the influence of these parameters on the compatibilization process. Chlorinated polyethylenes to compatibil-ize poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) and polyolefin elastomer (POE) blends. A series of chlorinated polyethylenes that are blocky in nature (bCPEs) with varying composition (% chlorine), and molecular weight (melt index) were used for this experiment. 

DSC is specified in USP for the physical testing of PE containers the quality of packaging material is of decisive importance for the protection of raw materials and end products, such as primary packaging material. As shown in Fig. 2.4, unprotected PE samples decompose almost immediately at the test temperature. However, a PE sample containing 0.04% stabiliser remains protected for approximately 16 min at the test temperature, whereas the PE sample containing 0.055% stabiliser is protected for 25 min [151]. The DSC test thus provides a rapid method of screening for the proper AO levels in a polymer. Bharel et al [152] have reported DSC-OIT for performance evaluation of two diamide antioxidants in HDPE and Hakani et al. [153] for the evaluation of oxidative stability of flexible polyolefins (FPO) with the biological y-oryzanol and a-tocopherol antioxidants for food and medical applications. 

The testing and evaluation methods refer to the building materials groups PVC (rigid, soft), polyolefins (PE, PP), PMMA, GF-UP, elastomers (CR, EPDM, butyl rubber), and PUR (foamed) as the plastics generally regarded as typical in building construction [154]. 

The evaluations indicated in the side-branches of Fig. 5 have a different purpose. They are intended to show from a scientific standpoint that the oxidation products formed from degradable polyolefins in the natural environment are bioassimilated by soil microorganisms. It would be ideal to take samples of plastics from compost at intervals to carry out biometric (carbon dioxide formation) tests and to measure mass-loss due to bioerosion of the plastic. However, this is a difficult procedure since CO2 formation is concomitant with mass loss during composting and it is difficult to achieve even an approximate mass balance. 

---