Polynomial criterion

Table 7.6 Parameters of the material functions Ki(N ) in the polynomial criterion [1]...

Other strength criteria are described by Sendeckyj [2-28]. Tennyson, MacDonald, and Nanyaro addressed the next logical step in a curve-fitting procedure, namely a third-order polynomial fit to failure data [2-29], However, the added complexity of their criterion has limited its use even though they identified some loading conditions under which their criterion is necessary to properly describe the actual failure behavior. 

R. C. Tennyson, D. MacDonald, arrd A. P. Nanyaro, Evaluation of the Tensor Polynomial Failure Criterion for Composite Materials, Journal of Composite Materials, January 1978, pp. 63-75. 

A selected subset of the reported densities is fit to functions of temperature using the least squares criterion. Up to a boundary temperature Tb (approximately 0.87 c), the calculated density px is represented by a polynomial in temperature with coefficients ak of order p,... 

Stability analysis methods Routh-Hurwitz criterion Apply the Routh test on the closed-loop characteristic polynomial to find if there are closed-loop poles on the right-hand-plane. 

For a more complex problem, the characteristic polynomial will not be as simple, and we need tools to help us. The two techniques that we will learn are the Routh-Hurwitz criterion and root locus. Root locus is, by far, the more important and useful method, especially when we can use a computer. Where circumstances allow (/.< ., the algebra is not too ferocious), we can also find the roots on the imaginary axis—the case of marginal stability. In the simple example above, this is where Kc = a/K. Of course, we have to be smart enough to pick Kc > a/K, and not Kc < a/K. 

The complete Routh array analysis allows us to find, for example, the number of poles on the imaginary axis. Since BIBO stability requires that all poles lie in the left-hand plane, we will not bother with these details (which are still in many control texts). Consider the fact that we can calculate easily the exact roots of a polynomial with MATLAB, we use the Routh criterion to the extent that it serves its purpose.1 That would be to derive inequality criteria for proper selection of controller gains of relatively simple systems. The technique loses its attractiveness when the algebra becomes too messy. Now the simplified Routh-Hurwitz recipe without proof follows. 

In this case, we have added one column of zeros they are needed to show how b2 is computed. Since b2 = 0 and c, = a0, the Routh criterion adds one additional constraint in the case of a third order polynomial ... 

With the Routh-Hurwitz criterion, we need immediately xr > 0 and Kc > 0. (The, v term requires Kc > -1, which is overridden by the last constant coefficient.) The Routh array for this third order polynomial is... 

Similarly, many different types of functions can be used. Arden discusses, for example, the use of Chebyshev polynomials, which are based on trigonometric functions (sines and cosines). But these polynomials have a major limitation they require the data to be collected at uniform -intervals throughout the range of X, and real data will seldom meet that criterion. Therefore, since they are also by far the simplest to deal with, the most widely used approximating functions are simple polynomials they are also convenient in that they are the direct result of applying Taylor s theorem, since Taylor s theorem produces a description of a polynomial that estimates the function being reproduced. Also, as we shall see, they lead to a procedure that can be applied to data having any distribution of the X-values. 

The Routh stability criterion is quite useful, but it has definite limitations. It cannot handle systems with deadtime. It tells if the system is stable or unstable but it gives no information about how stable or unstable the system is. That is, if the test tells us that the system is stable, we do not know how close to instability it is. Another limitation of the Routh method is the need to express the character istic equation explicitly as a polynomial in s. This can become complex in high-order systems. 

A typical application is given by Debets et al. A quality criterion for the characterization of separation in a chromatogram is modified by using Hermite polynomial coefficients in order to enhance the performance. The quality criterion can be used in... 

Fig. 2. Response surfaces of a separation quality criterion from chromatograms of sulfanilamide, sulfacetamide, sulfadiazine, sulfisomidine and sulfathiazole, with eluents consisting of water, methanol and acetonitrile, (a) with, and (b) without Hennite polynomial coefficients.

As shown in the above works, an optimal feedback/feedforward controller can be derived as an analytical function of the numerator and denominator polynomials of Gp(B) and Gn(B). No iteration or integration is required to generate the feedback law, as a consequence of the one step ahead criterion. Shinnar and Palmor (52) have also clearly demonstrated how dead time compensation (discrete time Smith predictor) arises naturally out of the minimum variance controller. These minimum variance techniques can also be extended to multi-variable systems, as shown by MacGregor (51). 

Separable algebras, besides describing connected components, are related to a familiar kind of matrix and can lead us to another class of group schemes. One calls an n x n matrix g separable if the subalgebra k[p] of End(/c") is separable. We have of course k[g] k[X]/p(X) where p(X) is the minimal polynomial of g. Separability then holds iff k[g] k = /qg] a fc(Y]/p(.Y) is separable over k. This means that p has no repeated roots over k, which is the familiar criterion for g to be diagonalizable over (We will extend this result in the next section.) Then p is separable in the usual Galois theory sense, its roots are in k, and g is diagonalizable over k,. 

A measure of the fidelity of the best set polynomial for the approxi-mation of In —f can be made through the criterion of least squares. We... 

For stability at a rest point one wishes to show that the eigenvalues of the linearization lie in the left half of the complex plane. There is a totally general result, the Routh-Hurwitz criterion, that can determine this. It is an algorithm for determining the signs of the real parts of the zeros of a polynomial. Since the eigenvalues of a matrix A are the roots of a polynomial... 

Finally, a similar algorithm A is defined that does not have 1 as an input A tries the values N 1, 2, Qn k) one by one, i.e., it calls A ( l 1 , "V, prek). If an output mk, proof) fulfils verify simple(prek, proof) = TRUE, A outputs proof and stops. Obviously, A runs in polynomial time. Moreover, its success probability is at least the maximum of the success probabilities of the individual iterations, because no unsuccessful stop is possible in an earlier iteration. This is the desired contradiction to Criterion 2 of Theorem 7.34. 

Proof sketch. The implicit and explicit requirements from Definitions 7.1 and 7.31 and the property to be polynomial-time in the interface inputs alone are easy to see. Among the criteria from Theorem 7.34, effectiveness of authentication is easily derived from that in the one-time scheme, and the security for the risk bearer is completely identical to that in the underlying one-time scheme. (Recall that the fact that the signer s entity bases many one-time key pairs on the same prekey makes no formal difference at all in Criterion 2 of Theorem 7.34.)... 

Routh-Hurwitz criterion The number of roots with positive real parts of a real polynomial equation is the number of sign changes in the following sequence ... 

---