Polymer virial coefficient

Theta conditions in dilute polymer solutions are similar to tire state of van der Waals gases near tire Boyle temperature. At this temperature, excluded-volume effects and van der Waals attraction compensate each other, so tliat tire second virial coefficient of tire expansion of tire pressure as a function of tire concentration vanishes. On dealing witli solutions, tire quantity of interest becomes tire osmotic pressure IT ratlier tlian tire pressure. Its virial expansion may be written as... 

In the next section we shall describe the use of Eq. (8.83) to determine the number average molecular weight of a polymer, and in subsequent sections we shall examine models which offer interpretations of the second virial coefficient. 

Our primary interest in the Flory-Krigbaum theory is in the conclusion that the second virial coefficient and the excluded volume depend on solvent-solute interactions and not exclusively on the size of the polymer molecule itself. It is entirely reasonable that this should be the case in light of the discussion in Sec. 1.11 on the expansion or contraction of the coil depending on the solvent. The present discussion incorporates these ideas into a consideration of solution nonideality. 

Many presentations of the second virial coefficient of polymer solutions contain different expressions for the quantities we have discussed. The difference lies in the fact that the factor p( - 0/T) appears in place of 1/2 - x-There are several attitudes we can take toward this difference. For one thing, we can regard the discrepancy as nothing more than different notation ... 

One thing that is apparent at the outset is that polymer molecules in solution are very different species from the rigid spheres upon which the Einstein theory is based. On the other hand, we saw in the last chapter that the random coil contributes an excluded volume to the second virial coefficient that is at least... 

Theta temperature (Flory temperature or ideal temperature) is the temperature at which, for a given polymer-solvent pair, the polymer exists in its unperturbed dimensions. The theta temperature, , can be determined by colligative property measurements, by determining the second virial coefficient. At theta temperature the second virial coefficient becomes zero. More rapid methods use turbidity and cloud point temperature measurements. In this method, the linearity of the reciprocal cloud point temperature (l/Tcp) against the logarithm of the polymer volume fraction (( )) is observed. Extrapolation to log ( ) = 0 gives the reciprocal theta temperature (Guner and Kara 1998). 

Theta temperature is one of the most important thermodynamic parameters of polymer solutions. At theta temperature, the long-range interactions vanish, segmental interactions become more effective and the polymer chains assume their unperturbed dimensions. It can be determined by light scattering and osmotic pressure measurements. These techniques are based on the fact that the second virial coefficient, A2, becomes zero at the theta conditions. 

The analogy with the virial expansion of PF for a real gas in powers of 1/F, where the excluded volume occupies an equivalent role, is obvious. If the gas molecules can be regarded as point particles which exert no forces on one another, u = 0, the second and higher virial coefficients (42, Azy etc.) vanish, and the gas behaves ideally. Similarly in the dilute polymer solutions when w = 0, i.e., at 1 = , Eqs. (70), (71), and (72) reduce to vanT Hoff s law... 

V is the molar volume of the solvent and pp the density of the polymer. For polydisperse polymers A2 is a more complex average, which shall not be discussed here in detail [7]. For good solvents and high concentrations, the influence of the 3rd virial coefficient A3 cannot be ignored, and n/c versus c sometimes does not lead to a linear plot. In these cases, a linearization can frequently be obtained with the approximation A3 = A (M)n/A by plotting [12,13]... 

Special care has to be taken if the polymer is only soluble in a solvent mixture or if a certain property, e.g., a definite value of the second virial coefficient, needs to be adjusted by adding another solvent. In this case the analysis is complicated due to the different refractive indices of the solvent components [32]. In case of a binary solvent mixture we find, that formally Equation (42) is still valid. The refractive index increment needs to be replaced by an increment accounting for a complex formation of the polymer and the solvent mixture, when one of the solvents adsorbs preferentially on the polymer. Instead of measuring the true molar mass Mw the apparent molar mass Mapp is measured. How large the difference is depends on the difference between the refractive index increments ([dn/dc) — (dn/dc)A>0. (dn/dc)fl is the increment determined in the mixed solvents in osmotic equilibrium, while (dn/dc)A0 is determined for infinite dilution of the polymer in solvent A. For clarity we omitted the fixed parameters such as temperature, T, and pressure, p. 

A3 AIBN c Cp DLS DLVO DSC EO GMA HS-DSC KPS LCST Osmotic third virial coefficient 2,2 -Azobis(isobutyronitrile) Polymer concentration Partial heat capacity Dynamic light scattering Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek Differential scanning calorimetry Ethylene oxide Glycidylmethacrylate High-sensitivity differential scanning calorimetry Potassium persulphate Lower critical solution temperature... 

Fig. 37 The phase diagram of a polymer globule in terms of the virial coefficients A2 and A3. (Schematically reproduced from Ref. [363])... 

Since Flory s works [6] the following assumption became traditional in polymer physics. The sign change in the second virial coefficient occurs at such a temperature (or such a state of the solvent) that all the other... 

The crucial question is at what value of <)> is the attraction high enough to induce phase separation De Hek and Vrij (6) assume that the critical flocculation concentration is equivalent to the phase separation condition defined by the spinodal point. From the pair potential between two hard spheres in a polymer solution they calculate the second virial coefficient B2 for the particles, and derive from the spinodal condition that if B2 = 1/2 (where is the volume fraction of particles in the dispersion) phase separation occurs. For a system in thermodynamic equilibrium, two phases coexist if the chemical potential of the hard spheres is the same in the dispersion and in the floe phase (i.e., the binodal condition). 

The virial coefficient A2, A3, etc. is a measure of the resultant interaction between the Polymer chains,... 

For accuracy in light-scattering measurement the proper choice of solvent is necessary. The difference in refractive index between polymer and solvent should be as large as possible. Moreover, the solvent should itself have relatively low scattering and the polymer-solvent system must not have too high a second virial coefficient as the extrapolation to zero polymer concentration becomes less certain for high A2. Mixed solvent should be avoided unless both components have the same refractive index. 

Of the preponderance of small ions, the colligative properties of polyelectrolytes in ionising solvents measure counterion activities rather than Molecular weight. In the presence of added salt, however, correct Molecular weights of polyelectrolytes can be measured by membrane osmometry, since the small ions can move across the membrane. The second virial coefficient differs from that previously defined, since it is determined by both ionic and non-ionic polymer-solvent interactions. 

Further development of the Flory-Huggins method in direction of taking into account the effects of far interaction, swelling of polymeric ball in good solvents [4, 5], difference of free volumes of polymer and solvent [6, 7] leaded to complication of expression for virial coefficient A and to growth of number of parameters needed for its numerical estimation, but weakly reflected on the possibility of equation (1) to describe the osmotic pressure of polymeric solutions in a wide range of concentrations. 

Other dilute solution properties depend also on LCB. For example, the second virial coefficient (A2) is reduced due to LCB. However, near the Flory 0 temperature, where A2 = 0 for linear polymers, branched polymers are observed to have apparent positive values of A2 [35]. This is now understood to be due to a more important contribution of the third virial coefficient near the 0 point in branched than in linear polymers. As a consequence, the experimental 0 temperature, defined as the temperature where A2 = 0 is lower in branched than in linear polymers [36, 37]. Branched polymers have also been found to have a wider miscibility range than linear polymers [38], As a consequence, high MW highly branched polymers will tend to coprecipitate with lower MW more lightly branched or linear polymers in solvent/non-solvent fractionation experiments. This makes fractionation according to the extent of branching less effective. 

Essentially, separate experiments on each polymer in the same solvent yield vA, Ma and the second virial coefficient (A2)a as well as the corresponding quantities for polymer B. When a mixture of the two polymers in which the composition of the polymers are WA and WB is dissolved in the same solvent, there are two approaches. 

---