Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Polymer support hydrophobic

When the polymer was prepared by the suspension polymerization technique, the product was crosslinked beads of unusually uniform size (see Fig. 16 for SEM picture of the beads) with hydrophobic surface characteristics. This shows that cardanyl acrylate/methacry-late can be used as comonomers-cum-cross-linking agents in vinyl polymerizations. This further gives rise to more opportunities to prepare polymer supports for synthesis particularly for experiments in solid-state peptide synthesis. Polymer supports based on activated acrylates have recently been reported to be useful in supported organic reactions, metal ion separation, etc. [198,199]. Copolymers are expected to give better performance and, hence, coplymers of CA and CM A with methyl methacrylate (MMA), styrene (St), and acrylonitrile (AN) were prepared and characterized [196,197]. [Pg.431]

Scheme 9.3 Polymer-supported synthesis of oligosaccharides employing a hydrophobic handle attached to the growing chain in the last step of the synthetic sequence. The handle permits separation of the majority of failure sequences accumulated during the synthesis. Scheme 9.3 Polymer-supported synthesis of oligosaccharides employing a hydrophobic handle attached to the growing chain in the last step of the synthetic sequence. The handle permits separation of the majority of failure sequences accumulated during the synthesis.
An interesting point is that our original RTV 118 quenching data is due in part to the presence of hydrophobic silica filler in the polymer. 64 We have examined in considerable detail the effect of silica filler in polymer supports. 33 It is noteworthy that the hydrophobic filled polymers give much less hooked results than the hydrophilic silica. Indeed, the hydrophobic silica gives nearly ideal one-site quenching results. 64 ... [Pg.103]

The same hyperbranched polyglycerol modified with hydrophobic palmitoyl groups was used for a noncovalent encapsulation of hydrophilic platinum Pincer [77]. In a double Michael addition of ethyl cyanoacetate with methyl vinyl ketone, these polymer supports indicated high conversion (81 to 59%) at room temperature in dichloromethane as a solvent. The activity was stiU lower compared with the noncomplexed Pt catalyst. Product catalyst separation was performed by dialysis allowing the recovery of 97% of catalytic material. This is therefore an illustrative example for the possible apphcation of such a polymer/catalyst system in continuous membrane reactors. [Pg.298]

Perhaps, unsurprisingly, the effects of polymer matrix on the reaction rate are probably at least as complex as solvent effects in solution-phase reactions, and broad generalizations about the characteristics of any given support in a series of different reactions are inappropriate. Reaction rates on supports depend on solvent swelling, selective adsorption, hydrogen bonding, hydrophobicity, and polarity. No single polymer support is best for all reactions. [Pg.233]

In a cryptate complex, the cation is enclosed wholly or partially in a hydrophobic sheath, so that not only are salts of this complexed cation soluble in nonpolar organic solvents but also extractable from aqueous solutions into organic solvents immiscible with water (144). Specific cryptands may be used to selectively complex metals from crude materials or wastes, particularly if they are immobilized on a polymer support (101, 114, 145). [Pg.21]

The insolubilized DIOP catalyst (34) was found to be rather ineffective for the asymmetric hydrogenation of oleflnic substrates the hydrogenation of a-ethyl-styrene proceeded readily but gave (-)-R-2-phenylbutane with an optical purity of only 1.5%. Methyl atropate was hydrogenated to (+)-S-methylhydratropate (2.5% ee). The soluble DIOP catalyst gave 15 and 17% ee, respectively, for the same reductions. The optical purity of the products was lower when recovered insolubilized catalyst was used. There was no reduction of a-acetamidocinnamic acid in ethanol-benzene with the insolubilized catalyst, presumably due to the hydrophobic nature of the polymer support causing it to shrink in hydroxylic solvents. [Pg.105]

In this polymerization, the biofunctional component (enzyme) can be concentrated in an interfacial area between the frozen ice crystal and the supercooled monomer phase, and immobilized by molecular entanglement between the enzyme and polymer molecules. This is a different procedure for fixation from the usual entrapping method with a crosslinked structure in a gel. Therefore, we may call this procedure the adhesion-method to distinguish it from the usual entrapping. This term was extended to cover the use of the usual synthetic polymers including hydrophobic polymers as the supports. One of the characteristic properties of products obtained in this way was that there is a maximum activity at a certain monomer concentration. The maximum activity is observed when the increased inner surface area is balanced by the increased leakage of enzyme and these occur with a decrease of monomer concentration. Immobilization by physical entrapping was also studied by Rosiak [26], Carenza [27] and Ha [28]. [Pg.87]

Aluminum chloride and its derivatives are the most familiar Lewis acids and are routinely employed in many Lewis acid-promoted synthetic transformations. The first polymer-supported metal Lewis acids to be studied were polymers attached by weak chemical or physical interactions to a Lewis acid. In the 1970s Neckers and coworkers reported the use of styrene-divinylbenzene copolymer-supported AlCl,- or BF3 as catalyst in condensations, esterifications, and acetalization of alcohols [11,12]. This type of polymer-supported AICI3 (1) is readily prepared by impregnation of a polystyrene resin with AICI3 in a suitable solvent. Subsequent removal of the solvent leaves a tightly bound complex of the resin and AICI3. The hydrophobic nature of polystyrene protects the moisture-sensitive Lewis acid from hydrolysis, and in this form the Lewis acid is considerably less sensitive to deactivation by hydrolysis. This polymer complex could be used as a mild Lewis acid catalyst for condensation of relatively acid-sensitive dicyclopropylcarbinol to an ether (Eq. 1) [13],... [Pg.946]

The methodology of solid phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) [65, 66] has been credited with the award of 1984 Nobel Prize in chemistry [67] to its inventor, Bruce R. Merrifield of the Rockefeller University. At the heart of the SPPS lies an insoluble polymer support or gel , which renders the synthetic peptide intermediates insoluble, and hence readily separable from excess reagents and by-products. In addition to peptide synthesis, beaded polymer gels are also being studied for a number of other synthetic and catalytic reactions [2]. Ideally, the polymer support should be chemically inert and not interfere with the chemistry under investigation. The provision of chemical inertiKss presents no difficulty, but the backbone structure of the polymer may profoundly influence the course of the reaction on the polymer support. This topic has attracted considerable interest, particularly in relation to the properties of polystyrene (nonpolar, hydrophobic), polydimethylacrylamide (polar, hydrophilic), and copoIy(styrene-dimethylaciylamide) (polar-nonpolar, amphiphilic) (see later). [Pg.19]

Current practice of the conventional solid phase peptide synthesis (the Merrifield method) is based largely on the use of polystyrene and poly-dimethylacrylamide supports (see Fig. 17). The latter polymer was introduced in the 1970s [12,133 to provide a relatively more polar support, as compared with polystyrene. However, accumulation of experimental evidoice since then (ct Rrf. 70), indicates that an ideal polyn r support for SPPS should be comi tible with both polar (H-bonding) and nonpolar (hydrophobic) residues on the peptic grafts (Fig. 17). When the polymer support is not compatible with the growing peptide grafts, phase separation occurs, and the synthesis becomes inefficient or impracticable. [Pg.28]

Fig. 17. Chemical structures of polymer supports based on styrene (nonpolar, hydrophobic), polydimethylacryiamide (polar, hydrophilic) and styiene dimethylacrylamide (amphiphilic Structures of nonpdar (18-19) and polar (20-21) pq)tide residues are also shown to illustrate the basis of polymer-pepAide incompatiUIity during peptide synthesis on polystyrene and polydimethylacryl-amifte. Am philk polymer supports are expected to be compatible with both nonpolar and polar peptUe resMlnes... Fig. 17. Chemical structures of polymer supports based on styrene (nonpolar, hydrophobic), polydimethylacryiamide (polar, hydrophilic) and styiene dimethylacrylamide (amphiphilic Structures of nonpdar (18-19) and polar (20-21) pq)tide residues are also shown to illustrate the basis of polymer-pepAide incompatiUIity during peptide synthesis on polystyrene and polydimethylacryl-amifte. Am philk polymer supports are expected to be compatible with both nonpolar and polar peptUe resMlnes...
Sequential complexation was confirmed in reference 97, where it was reported that P-CD addition decreases the R value and increases the intensity of the two vibronic bands. Solutions of P-CD containing 13 always exhibited a biexponential decay the shortest, t, = 130 ns, has the same lifetime of 13 in water, the largest, Tj = 300 ns, indicates that 13 experiences a hydrophobic environment. The ratio of the preexponentials /42Mi grew monotonically with [/ -CD]. The data are consistent with a sequential complexation, as in the complexation of 13 with a-CD. In the 1 1 complex, the included pyrene has the same lifetime as 13 in water because a substantial portion of the molecule is still exposed to the solvent when 13 is encapsulated by two cyclodextrins, it experiences a low-polarity microenvironment and its lifetime consequently increases. In the same paper, the complexing ability of a polymer-supported P-CD of the general formula... [Pg.18]

RPC-5 and other mixed mode chromatographic techniques are based on ionic as well as on hydrophobic interactions. RPC-5 is the earliest of these techniques having been introduced more than 20 years ago [26]. The resin applied originally consists of a charged reversed-phase matrix with a quaternary ammonium derivative (such as methyltrialkyl (Cg-Cjo) ammonium chloride) being adsorbed on a non-porous polymer support such as Plaskon or Teflon. In contrast to other HPLC-resins, the surface-forming groups of RPC-5 are physically adsorbed to the polymeric support and are not covalently bound therefore RPC-5, in principle, can be called a... [Pg.94]


See other pages where Polymer support hydrophobic is mentioned: [Pg.56]    [Pg.431]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.589]    [Pg.501]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.645]    [Pg.607]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.1210]    [Pg.1377]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.565]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.511]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.31 ]




SEARCH



Hydrophobic support

Hydrophobized polymers

Polymers hydrophobic

© 2024 chempedia.info