Polarization, static energy

In the presence of a static, spatially uniform electric field Ea, the electronic cloud of atomic and molecular systems gets polarized. The energy, W, can be written as a Taylor series [1-3]... 

The two papers cited above also give explicit expressions for the polarization (induction) energies between polar molecules. They are expressed in terms of permanent moments and static polarizabilities of the interacting molecules. Both are observable quantities that can be measured by experiment. 

The main difference between a molecule-molecule (M-M) collision and an ion-molecule (M+-M) collision is the presence of a polarization force in the latter system owing to the attraction between the static charge on M+ and the dipole moment induced on M. For a large inter molecular separation, the polarization energy is known as... 

The electrostatic energy is calculated using the distributed multipolar expansion introduced by Stone [39,40], with the expansion carried out through octopoles. The expansion centers are taken to be the atom centers and the bond midpoints. So, for water, there are five expansion points (three at the atom centers and two at the O-H bond midpoints), while in benzene there are 24 expansion points. The induction or polarization term is represented by the interaction of the induced dipole on one fragment with the static multipolar field on another fragment, expressed in terms of the distributed localized molecular orbital (LMO) dipole polarizabilities. That is, the number of polarizability points is equal to the number of bonds and lone pairs in the molecule. One can opt to include inner shells as well, but this is usually not useful. The induced dipoles are iterated to self-consistency, so some many body effects are included. 

The inducing field responsible for the energy of the induced dipoles, Umd, has contributions from three terms the permanent or static field, Ustat, the induced dipole-induced dipole interaction, Udip, and the polarization energy, Upou... 

The second problem of interest is to find normal vibrational frequencies and integral intensities for spectral lines that are active in infrared absorption spectra. In this instance, we can consider the molecular orientations, to be already specified. Further, it is of no significance whether the orientational structure eRj results from energy minimization for static dipole-dipole interactions or from the competition of any other interactions (e.g. adsorption potentials). For non-polar molecules (iij = 0), the vectors eRy describe dipole moment orientations for dipole transitions. 

While the enthalpy of formation is the property of interest in chemical thermodynamics of materials, many books focus on the lattice enthalpy when considering trends in stability. The static non-vibrational part of the lattice enthalpy can be deconvoluted into contributions of electrostatic nature, due to electron-electron repulsion, dispersion or van der Waals attraction, polarization and crystal field effects. The lattice enthalpy is in the 0 K approximation given as a sum of the potential energies of the different contributions ... 

Finally - and equally important - Jens contribution to the formal treatment of GOS based on the polarization propagator method and Bethe sum rules has been shown to provide a correct quantum description of the excitation spectra and momentum transfer in the study of the stopping cross section within the Bethe-Bloch theory. Of particular interest is the correct description of the mean excitation energy within the polarization propagator for atomic and molecular compounds. This motivated the study of the GOS in the RPA approximation and in the presence of a static electromagnetic field to ensure the validity of the sum rules. 

---